School of Social Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 5;40(51):7353-7359. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
A workshop on mandatory vaccination was pitched to the World Public Health Congress in 2019 and the resultant special issue was pitched to Vaccine in 2020. During this project, the COVID-19 pandemic pushed vaccine policy to the forefront of global public health policy, and the imposition of vaccine mandates prompted a new wave of scholarship in the field. This introductory article employs the heuristic of Lasswell's (1956) policy cycle to synthesise the findings of the articles in the special issue. It considers the temporal lifetime of mandates and highlights findings regarding: the emergence of mandates as a policy option, public support and policy instrument design, what matters in the implementation of mandates, and what we can learn from evaluating them. The second half of the paper categorizes the included papers in terms of what aspects of mandates they study and the methods they employ to do so, in order to formulate a guide for future researchers of vaccine mandates. Scholars study either speculative or existing mandates - research can address several stages of the policy cycle or just one of them, ranging from attitudinal research to implementation studies and impact studies. Historical and contextual studies that take deep dives into a particular mandate are a much needed resource for studying emerging mandates, too, and scoping and framework- building work will undoubtedly be valuable in understanding and appreciating the wealth of knowledge production in this growing field. This special issue can serve as a roadmap for a consolidation of this interdisciplinary research agenda, and provide a helpful resource for decisionmakers at this historical juncture.
2019 年,世界公共卫生大会举办了一场关于强制接种疫苗的研讨会,随后在 2020 年向《疫苗》杂志提出了这一特别专题。在这个项目过程中,COVID-19 大流行将疫苗政策推向了全球公共卫生政策的前沿,而疫苗强制接种的实施则在该领域引发了新一轮的学术研究。这篇介绍性文章运用了拉斯韦尔(Lasswell)(1956)的政策周期启发式方法,对特刊中的文章的研究结果进行了综合分析。它考虑了疫苗接种授权的时间寿命,并强调了以下发现:作为政策选择的出现、公众支持和政策工具设计、在实施疫苗接种授权方面的重要因素,以及我们从评估中可以学到什么。本文的后半部分根据所研究的疫苗接种授权的方面以及他们采用的方法,对收录的文章进行了分类,以便为未来的疫苗接种授权研究人员制定一个指南。学者们研究的是推测性的或现有的疫苗接种授权——研究可以涉及政策周期的几个阶段,也可以只涉及其中一个阶段,从态度研究到实施研究和影响研究。对特定授权进行深入研究的历史和背景研究,对于研究新兴授权也是非常必要的资源,范围划定和框架构建工作无疑将有助于理解和欣赏这一不断发展的领域丰富的知识成果。本特刊可以作为整合这一跨学科研究议程的路线图,并为决策者在这一历史关头提供有益的资源。