Oxford Vaccine Group, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine (CCVTM) University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
Oxford Vaccine Group, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine (CCVTM) University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 5;40(51):7488-7499. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.031. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Protests starting in the summer of 2020, notedly in the US and UK, have brought together two constituencies: pre-existing anti-vaccine groups and newly formed oppositional COVID-19 groups. The oppositional COVID-19 groups vary in composition and nature, but the central focus is a disagreement about the seriousness and threat of COVID-19 and with the public health measures to control COVID-19. What unites many disparate interests is an aversion to mandates. The compulsion to undertake particular public health activities such as mask-wearing and vaccination is a complex topic of public attitudes and beliefs alongside public health goals and messaging. We aim to analyse social media discussions about facemask wearing and the adoption of potential vaccines for COVID-19. Using media monitoring software Meltwater, we analyse English-language tweets for one year from 1st June 2020 until 1st June 2021. We pay particular attention to connections in conversations between key topics of concern regarding masks and vaccines across social media networks. We track where ideas and activist behaviours towards both health interventions have originated, have similarities, and how they have changed over time. Our aim is to provide an overview of the key trends and themes of discussion concerning attitudes to and adoption of health measures in the control of COVID-19 and how publics react when confronted with mandatory policies. We draw on an already extensive literature about mandatory vaccination policies to inform our assessment, from psychology and behavioural science to ethics, political theory, sociology, and public policy.
始于 2020 年夏天的抗议活动,尤其是在美国和英国,将两个群体聚集在一起:先前存在的反疫苗群体和新形成的反对 COVID-19 的群体。反对 COVID-19 的群体在组成和性质上有所不同,但核心焦点是对 COVID-19 的严重性和威胁以及控制 COVID-19 的公共卫生措施存在分歧。将许多不同利益联系在一起的是对强制要求的反感。对某些公共卫生活动(如戴口罩和接种疫苗)的强制要求是公众态度和信念以及公共卫生目标和信息传递的一个复杂话题。我们旨在分析有关戴口罩和采用 COVID-19 潜在疫苗的社交媒体讨论。我们使用媒体监测软件 Meltwater,从 2020 年 6 月 1 日到 2021 年 6 月 1 日,对一年的英语推文进行分析。我们特别关注社交媒体网络中有关口罩和疫苗的关键话题之间的对话中的联系。我们追踪这两种健康干预措施的想法和激进行为的起源、相似之处以及它们随时间的变化。我们的目的是提供有关控制 COVID-19 的健康措施的态度和采用的关键趋势和主题的概述,以及公众在面对强制性政策时的反应。我们借鉴了关于强制性疫苗接种政策的已有的广泛文献,从心理学和行为科学到伦理学、政治理论、社会学和公共政策,为我们的评估提供信息。