Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Reproductive Health and Health Service Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 17;22(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05171-3.
Antenatal health care utilization has the potential to influence maternal and new-born health. In this study, we assessed compliance of antenatal care utilization with national and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. We also examined association of antenatal care utilization with adverse pregnancy outcomes as secondary outcome.
This was a community-based cross sectional study conducted from July 2016 to November 2017 in rural south-central Ethiopia. We described antenatal care received by pregnant women, whom we followed at three prescheduled visits during pregnancy and collected birth data at time of delivery. Extent of antenatal care content received, timing of antenatal care, place of antenatal care and place and mode of delivery were obtained and computed in accordance with national and WHO guidelines. For adverse pregnancy outcomes, computed as sum of low birth weight, preterm birth, intrauterine foetal death, and stillbirth, the exposure variable used was antenatal care utilization.
Seven hundred and four (704) women participated in the study, and 536 (76.1%) had attended at least one antenatal care visit. Among women who attended antenatal care visit, majority, 421 (79.3%), had done so at health centres and hospitals, while 110 (20.7%) attended at health post. Average number of antenatal care visits was 2.5, which is less than that recommended in national and WHO guidelines. Only 18 (2.6%) women had attended antenatal care in their first trimester, which is low in contrast to the expected 100% specified in the guidelines. Less than half (47%) of the women delivered in a health facility. This is in contrast to the 100% expected health institution deliveries. Low birth weight was 7.9% (n = 48), and preterm birth was 4.9% (n = 31). There were 12 twin pregnancies, three stillbirths, 11 spontaneous abortions, and two intrauterine foetal deaths. We did not find significant association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and antenatal care utilization (COR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.62, 1.86).
This study showed that antenatal care service utilization in the study area was markedly low compared to that recommended in national and WHO guidelines. The obtained antenatal health care utilization was not associated with the registered adverse pregnancy outcomes.
产前保健的利用有可能影响母婴健康。在这项研究中,我们评估了产前保健的利用情况是否符合国家和世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南。我们还将产前保健的利用情况与不良妊娠结局(次要结局)进行了关联分析。
这是一项 2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 11 月在埃塞俄比亚中南部农村进行的基于社区的横断面研究。我们描述了孕妇接受的产前保健情况,我们在怀孕期间对这些孕妇进行了三次预定访视,并在分娩时收集了分娩数据。根据国家和世界卫生组织的指南,获得并计算了接受的产前保健内容、产前保健的时间、产前保健的地点以及分娩的地点和方式。对于不良妊娠结局,计算为低出生体重、早产、宫内胎儿死亡和死产的总和,暴露变量是产前保健的利用情况。
704 名妇女参加了这项研究,其中 536 名(76.1%)至少接受了一次产前保健就诊。在接受产前保健就诊的妇女中,大多数(421 名,79.3%)在卫生中心和医院就诊,而 110 名(20.7%)在卫生所就诊。平均产前保健就诊次数为 2.5 次,低于国家和世界卫生组织指南推荐的次数。只有 18 名(2.6%)妇女在孕早期接受了产前保健,这与指南中预期的 100%相差甚远。不到一半(47%)的妇女在医疗机构分娩。这与指南中预期的 100%的医疗机构分娩比例形成了鲜明对比。低出生体重的发生率为 7.9%(n=48),早产的发生率为 4.9%(n=31)。有 12 例双胞胎妊娠,3 例死产,11 例自然流产和 2 例宫内胎儿死亡。我们没有发现不良妊娠结局与产前保健的利用之间存在显著关联(COR=1.07,95%CI 0.62,1.86)。
本研究表明,与国家和世界卫生组织指南推荐的相比,研究地区的产前保健服务利用率明显较低。获得的产前保健利用情况与登记的不良妊娠结局无关。