• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响土耳其长期护理偏好的因素。

Factors Affecting Long-Term Care Preferences in Turkey.

作者信息

Guduk Ozden, Ankara Hasan Giray

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Yuksek Ihtisas University, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022 Dec;26(4):330-339. doi: 10.4235/agmr.22.0088. Epub 2022 Nov 18.

DOI:10.4235/agmr.22.0088
PMID:36397295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9830061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the long-term care preferences and the factors affecting theses preferences in Turkish society, where long-term care may soon become an important issue.

METHODS

We applied data from the Family Structure Survey of Turkey conducted in 2016. Using data from 35,475 individuals, we performed descriptive analysis and logistic regressions to determine the preferences and determinants of individuals based on the Andersen Behavior Model.

RESULTS

Informal care was the main preference of individuals living in Turkey (37%). Men, individuals living in an extended family, and the young mostly favored informal care, while women, well-educated individuals, and urban individuals preferred institutional or formal care at home.

CONCLUSION

Efforts should be made to raise individuals' awareness regarding existing long-term care services. These services should be strengthened in line with society's preferences, considering regional differences.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定在长期护理可能很快成为一个重要问题的土耳其社会中,长期护理偏好以及影响这些偏好的因素。

方法

我们应用了2016年进行的土耳其家庭结构调查的数据。利用来自35475人的数据,我们进行了描述性分析和逻辑回归,以根据安德森行为模型确定个人的偏好和决定因素。

结果

非正式护理是居住在土耳其的个人的主要偏好(37%)。男性、生活在大家庭中的个人以及年轻人大多倾向于非正式护理,而女性、受过良好教育的个人以及城市居民则更喜欢机构护理或居家正式护理。

结论

应努力提高个人对现有长期护理服务的认识。应根据社会偏好并考虑地区差异来加强这些服务。

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting Long-Term Care Preferences in Turkey.影响土耳其长期护理偏好的因素。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022 Dec;26(4):330-339. doi: 10.4235/agmr.22.0088. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
2
[Long-Term Care Preferences Among Individuals of Advanced Age in Germany: Results of a Population-Based Study].[德国高龄人群的长期护理偏好:一项基于人群的研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Aug;80(8-09):685-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124663. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
3
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
4
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Substitution of Formal and Informal Home Care Service Use and Nursing Home Service Use: Health Outcomes, Decision-Making Preferences, and Implications for a Public Health Policy.正式和非正式家庭护理服务使用以及养老院服务使用的替代:健康结果、决策偏好及对公共卫生政策的影响
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 24;5:297. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00297. eCollection 2017.
7
Consistency between preference and use of long-term care among caregivers of stroke survivors.
Public Health Nurs. 1998 Oct;15(5):379-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1998.tb00363.x.
8
Long-term care preferences among older adults: a moving target?老年人的长期护理偏好:一个不断变化的目标?
J Aging Soc Policy. 2008;20(2):182-200. doi: 10.1080/08959420801977574.
9
Analysis of the Influencing Factors on the Preferences of the Elderly for the Combination of Medical Care and Pension in Long-Term Care Facilities Based on the Andersen Model.基于安德森模型的长期护理机构中老年人对医养结合偏好的影响因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):5436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155436.
10
Quantifying long-term care preferences.量化长期护理偏好。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):106-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551641. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for long-termcare among elderly patients who had a stroke with disabilities in Eastern China: protocol for a ditscrete choice experiment study.中国东部地区中风后残疾老年患者对长期护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e097257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097257.
2
Are Filipinos Ready for Long-term Care? A Qualitative Study on Awareness, Perspectives, and Challenges of Relevant Organizations, Community Leaders, Carers, and Older Persons in Select Sites in the Philippines.菲律宾人是否为长期护理做好准备?关于菲律宾部分地区相关组织、社区领袖、护理人员和老年人的认知、观点及挑战的定性研究。
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Feb 28;59(3):21-38. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9778. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Guidelines for Publishing in the Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research.《老年医学与研究年鉴》发表的伦理准则。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022 Mar;26(1):1-3. doi: 10.4235/agmr.22.0021. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
Preferences in long-term care models and related factors among older adults: a cross-sectional study from Shandong Province, China.中国山东省老年人长期护理模式偏好及相关因素:一项横断面研究
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Jan 2;19(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00595-2. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Impact of day care services on physical and cognitive functions in old people with dementia in a medical center in central Taiwan.
Family care and predictors of the disabled elderly in China: A cross-sectional study based on the Anderson model.
家庭护理与中国失能老人的预测因素:基于安德森模型的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 4;19(11):e0312002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312002. eCollection 2024.
4
Willingness to purchase institutionalised elderly services and influencing factors among Chinese older adults: a nationwide cross-sectional study.中国老年人购买机构养老服务的意愿及影响因素:一项全国性横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e082548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082548.
探讨位于台湾中部某医学中心之失智老人日间照顾服务对其身体与认知功能之影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jun 24;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01806-9.
4
Informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic perceive additional burden: findings from an ad-hoc survey in Germany.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非正式护理人员感受到了额外的负担:来自德国一项特别调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06359-7.
5
Policies and Transformation of Long-Term Care System in Taiwan.台湾长期照护体系的政策与变革
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Sep;24(3):187-194. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0038. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
Making the Decision to Move to a Nursing Home: Longitudinal Evidence From the Health and Retirement Study.做出入住养老院的决定:来自健康与退休研究的纵向证据。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Oct;40(10):1197-1205. doi: 10.1177/0733464820949042. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
7
Analysis of the Influencing Factors on the Preferences of the Elderly for the Combination of Medical Care and Pension in Long-Term Care Facilities Based on the Andersen Model.基于安德森模型的长期护理机构中老年人对医养结合偏好的影响因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):5436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155436.
8
A Logic Model for Evaluation and Planning in an Adult Day Care for Disabled Japanese Old People.日本失能老人日间照料中心评估与规划的逻辑模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;17(6):2061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062061.
9
Impact of urine and mixed incontinence on long-term care preference: a vignette-survey study of community-dwelling older adults.尿失禁和混合性尿失禁对长期护理偏好的影响:一项对社区居住的老年成年人的情景调查研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1439-x.
10
Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan.长期护理融资:来自日本的经验教训。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Aug 1;8(8):462-466. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.35.