• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。

Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0
PMID:29626266
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most people prefer to "age in place" and to remain in their homes for as long as possible even in case they require long-term care. While informal care is projected to decrease in Germany, the use of home- and community-based services (HCBS) can be expected to increase in the future. Preference-based data on aspects of HCBS is needed to optimize person-centered care.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services packages.

DESIGN

Discrete choice experiment conducted in mailed survey.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Randomly selected sample of the general population aged 45-64 years in Germany (n = 1.209).

MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED

Preferences and marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for HCBS were assessed with respect to five HCBS attributes (with 2-4 levels): care time per day, service level of the HCBS provider, quality of care, number of different caregivers per month, co-payment.

RESULTS

Quality of care was the most important attribute to respondents and small teams of regular caregivers (1-2) were preferred over larger teams. Yet, an extended range of services of the HCBS provider was not preferred over a more narrow range. WTP per hour of HCBS was €8.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings on preferences for HCBS in the general population in Germany add to the growing international evidence of preferences for LTC. In light of the great importance of high care quality to respondents, reimbursement for services by HCBS providers could be more strongly linked to the quality of services.

摘要

背景

大多数人希望“原地老化”,并尽可能长时间地留在自己的家中,即使他们需要长期护理。尽管德国的非正式护理预计会减少,但未来对家庭和社区为基础的服务(HCBS)的使用预计会增加。需要基于偏好的 HCBS 方面的数据,以优化以患者为中心的护理。

目的

调查对家庭和社区长期护理服务包的偏好。

设计

在邮寄调查中进行离散选择实验。

设置和参与者

德国随机选择的 45-64 岁普通人群样本(n=1209)。

主要研究变量

使用五个 HCBS 属性(2-4 个水平)评估 HCBS 的偏好和边际支付意愿(WTP):每天的护理时间、HCBS 提供者的服务水平、护理质量、每月不同护理人员的数量、共同支付。

结果

护理质量是受访者最重要的属性,小团队的常规护理人员(1-2 人)比大团队更受欢迎。然而,HCBS 提供者提供的广泛服务范围并不比更窄的范围更受欢迎。HCBS 每小时的 WTP 为 8.98 欧元。

结论

我们在德国普通人群中对 HCBS 的偏好研究结果补充了国际上关于长期护理偏好的不断增加的证据。鉴于受访者对高护理质量的高度重视,HCBS 提供者的服务报销可以更紧密地与服务质量挂钩。

相似文献

1
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Older adults preferences for long-term caregivers in China: a discrete choice experiment.中国老年人对长期照护者的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
Physical Therapy Services for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: The Role of Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Service Waivers.《为智力和发育障碍者提供的物理治疗服务:医疗补助居家和社区服务豁免的作用》。
Phys Ther. 2018 Oct 1;98(10):844-854. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy082.
5
LTC 2.0: The 2017 reform of home- and community-based long-term care in Taiwan.长期照护2.0:2017年台湾居家与社区长期照护改革
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):912-916. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Comparison of resource utilization for Medicaid dementia patients using nursing homes versus home and community based waivers for long-term care.使用养老院与基于家庭和社区的豁免计划为医疗补助痴呆症患者提供长期护理的资源利用情况比较。
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):449-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181621eae.
7
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.社区长期服务与支持:迈向研究议程。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
8
Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.调查消费者和非正式护理人员对消费者导向型护理的看法和偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment.长期护理服务偏好:来自离散选择实验的意愿支付估计。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1317-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.027. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
10
[Long-Term Care Preferences Among Individuals of Advanced Age in Germany: Results of a Population-Based Study].[德国高龄人群的长期护理偏好:一项基于人群的研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Aug;80(8-09):685-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124663. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Attribute Development and Level Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Care Preferences of Older Adults and Informal Caregivers Aging in Place in The Netherlands.荷兰针对老年人和就地养老的非正式照料者开展离散选择实验以引出护理偏好的属性开发与水平选择
Patient. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00774-2.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Compensation preferences of home-based disabled beneficiaries in the long-term care insurance system in Guangzhou, China.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with preferences for long-term care settings in old age: evidence from a population-based survey in Germany.老年长期护理机构偏好的相关因素:来自德国一项基于人群调查的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2101-y.
2
Capacity and readiness for quality improvement among home and community-based service providers.居家和社区服务提供者进行质量改进的能力与准备情况。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2016 Jul-Dec;35(3-4):182-196. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2016.1264343.
3
Care Consistency With Documented Care Preferences: Methodologic Considerations for Implementing the "Measuring What Matters" Quality Indicator.
中国广州长期护理保险制度中居家残疾受益人的补偿偏好
Health Policy Plan. 2025 May 9;40(5):556-565. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf015.
4
Influence of prior knowledge and experience on willingness to pay for home hospice services: a contingent valuation study.先验知识和经验对家庭临终关怀服务支付意愿的影响:一项条件价值评估研究。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s10754-025-09393-8.
5
The prevalence and risk factors of sleep disturbances in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社区居住老年人睡眠障碍的患病率及危险因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sleep Breath. 2025 Feb 21;29(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11325-025-03267-6.
6
Patients' and Relatives' Preferences for Outpatient and Day Care Services Within End-of-Life Care in Germany - A Discrete Choice Experiment.德国临终关怀中患者及亲属对门诊和日间护理服务的偏好——一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Feb 29;18:519-529. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S442047. eCollection 2024.
7
Preferences for Living Arrangements in Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.痴呆症患者生活安排的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Jan;8(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00452-9. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
8
Association between home and community-based services and depressive symptoms in Chinese older adults: a multilevel analysis.家庭和社区服务与中国老年人抑郁症状的关系:多层次分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):1406. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16008-9.
9
Research on layout model and construction planning of aged care institutions for disabled elders in China: based on Nanjing city data.中国失能老人养老机构布局模型与建设规划研究:基于南京市数据。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03924-z.
10
Preferences for public long-term care insurance among middle-aged and elderly residents: A discrete choice experiment in Hubei Province, China.中国湖北省中老年人对公共长期护理保险的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1050407. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1050407. eCollection 2023.
与记录的护理偏好的护理一致性:实施“衡量重要事项”质量指标的方法学考量
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
4
[Effects of quality-oriented remuneration].
Unfallchirurg. 2016 May;119(5):454-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-016-0172-6.
5
Trade-off Between Quality, Price, and Profit Orientation in Germany's Nursing Homes.德国养老院在质量、价格和利润导向之间的权衡。
Ageing Int. 2016;41:89-98. doi: 10.1007/s12126-015-9227-1. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
6
[The Role of Preferences in the German Long-Term Care Insurance - Results from Expert Interviews].[偏好因素在德国长期护理保险中的作用——专家访谈结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Dec;79(12):1052-1057. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
The importance of older patients' experiences with care delivery for their quality of life after hospitalization.老年患者的护理体验对其住院后生活质量的重要性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 8;15:311. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0982-1.
8
Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.调查消费者和非正式护理人员对消费者导向型护理的看法和偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Re-imagining long-term services and supports: towards livable environments, service capacity, and enhanced community integration, choice, and quality of life for seniors.重新构想长期服务与支持:迈向适居环境、服务能力以及提升老年人的社区融合度、选择权和生活质量。
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):286-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv016. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
10
Measuring patient-centered care: An updated systematic review of how studies define and report concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments.衡量以患者为中心的医疗服务:关于研究如何界定和报告患者偏好与医疗治疗之间一致性的最新系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):811-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 21.