Ito Toshikazu, Kameda Issei, Fujimoto Naoki, Momosaki Ryo
Department of Rehabilitation, Mie University Hospital, Japan.
Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
J Rural Med. 2022 Oct;17(4):221-227. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2022-015. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
This study assessed the regional disparities and the associated factors in the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in Japan. Regional disparities were investigated by comparing the number of cardiac rehabilitation units in each of 47 prefectures in Japan based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims Open Data published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The relationships between the numbers of inpatient and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units and the numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation, board-certified physiatrists, and board-certified cardiologists were examined. The region with the highest and lowest numbers of inpatient units showed 11,620.5 and 1,650.2 population-adjusted cardiac rehabilitation units adjusted per 100,000 population, respectively, corresponding to a 7.0-fold difference. Meanwhile, 4,865.3 and 238.6 units were present in the regions with the highest and lowest numbers of outpatient units, respectively, corresponding to a 20.4-fold regional disparity. Our analysis showed that the population-adjusted number of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.647, <0.001) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.445, =0.002) but only marginally associated with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.329, =0.024). Moreover, the population-adjusted number of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.406, =0.005) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.450, =0.002) but not with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.078, =0.603). Large regional disparities were observed during the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation. Increased numbers of cardiac rehabilitation instructors and cardiac rehabilitation practices are expected to eliminate these regional differences in cardiac rehabilitation practices.
本研究评估了日本心脏康复实施过程中的地区差异及相关因素。基于厚生劳动省发布的全国健康保险理赔公开数据,通过比较日本47个都道府县各自的心脏康复机构数量来调查地区差异。研究了住院和门诊心脏康复机构数量与心脏康复注册指导员、认证物理治疗师和认证心脏病专家数量之间的关系。住院机构数量最多和最少的地区,每10万人口中经人口调整后的心脏康复机构分别为11,620.5个和1,650.2个,相差7.0倍。同时,门诊机构数量最多和最少的地区分别有4,865.3个和238.6个机构,地区差异达20.4倍。我们的分析表明,经人口调整后的住院心脏康复机构数量与经人口调整后的心脏康复注册指导员数量(r = 0.647,<0.001)和认证心脏病专家数量(r = 0.445,=0.002)显著相关,但与经人口调整后的认证物理治疗师数量仅存在微弱关联(r = 0.329,=0.024)。此外,经人口调整后的门诊心脏康复机构数量与经人口调整后的心脏康复注册指导员数量(r = 0.406,=0.005)和认证心脏病专家数量(r = 0.450,=0.002)显著相关,但与经人口调整后的认证物理治疗师数量无关(r = 0.078,=0.603)。在心脏康复实施过程中观察到了较大的地区差异。预计增加心脏康复指导员数量和心脏康复实践将消除这些心脏康复实践中的地区差异。