Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Japan.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 20;13(6):e071670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071670.
There are few reports on regional differences in the supply/utilisation balance and provision of rehabilitation services. This study analysed those regional differences in Japan to help policymakers provide more uniform and efficient rehabilitation services and optimally allocate related resources.
An ecological study.
47 prefectures and 9 regions in Japan in 2017.
Primary measures were 'supply/utilisation (S/U) ratio', calculated by dividing rehabilitation supply converted to service units, by rehabilitation utilisation and 'utilisation/expected utilisation (U/EU) ratio', calculated by dividing utilisation by EU. The EU was defined as utilisation expected from the demography in each area. Data required to calculate these indicators were collected from open sources such as the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan Open Data Japan.
The S/U ratios were higher in Shikoku, Kyusyu, Tohoku and Hokuriku regions, and lower in Kanto and Tokai regions. The number of rehabilitation providers per population was higher mostly in the western part of Japan and lower mostly in the eastern part. The U/EU ratios were also higher mostly in the western part, and lower mostly in the eastern part such as Tohoku and Hokuriku regions. The same trend was seen for cerebrovascular disease and musculoskeletal disorder rehabilitation, which accounted for approximately 84% of rehabilitation services. For disuse syndrome rehabilitation, such a trend did not exist, and the U/EU ratio differed by prefectures.
The large surplus in rehabilitation supply in the western part was attributed to the greater number of providers, while the smaller surplus in Kanto and Tokai regions was due to the smaller amount of supply. The number of rehabilitation services used was lesser in the eastern part such as Tohoku and Hokuriku regions, indicating regional differences in the provision of rehabilitation services.
有关康复服务供给/利用平衡和提供情况的区域差异的报告较少。本研究分析了日本的这些区域差异,以帮助政策制定者提供更统一和有效的康复服务,并优化相关资源的配置。
生态研究。
2017 年日本的 47 个县和 9 个地区。
主要指标是“供给/利用(S/U)比”,通过将康复供给转换为服务单位除以康复利用来计算,以及“利用/预期利用(U/EU)比”,通过将利用除以每个区域的人口统计学预期利用来计算。这些指标所需的数据从日本医疗保险索赔国家数据库和日本开放数据特定健康检查等公开来源中收集。
S/U 比在四国、九州、东北地区和北陆地区较高,在关东和东海地区较低。每人口的康复提供者数量在日本西部较高,在东部较低。U/EU 比也在西部较高,在东部如东北地区和北陆地区较低。这一趋势在脑血管病和肌肉骨骼疾病康复中也很明显,它们约占康复服务的 84%。对于废用综合征康复,没有这种趋势,U/EU 比因县而异。
西部康复供给的大量过剩归因于提供者数量较多,而关东和东海地区的过剩较小则归因于供给量较小。东北地区和北陆地区等东部地区的康复服务利用率较低,表明康复服务的提供存在区域差异。