Suppr超能文献

监管工具是否会促使采取措施预防与工作相关的心理社会和人体工效学风险因素?挪威家庭护理服务中劳工监察局试验的过程评价。

Do regulatory tools instigate measures to prevent work-related psychosocial and ergonomic risk factors? A process evaluation of a Labour inspection authority trial in the Norwegian home-care services.

机构信息

Department of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Majorstuen, 5330, N-0034, Oslo, Norway.

National Institute of Occupational Health, Majorstuen, 5330, N-0034, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2022 Nov 18;15(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06244-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is a research gap regarding the way managers and employee representatives respond to Labour Authority interventions targeting work-related psychosocial and ergonomic risk factors. The present study aimed to determine if (I) labour inspections and (II) guidance-through-workshops led by inspectors were perceived by the target audience as equally useful and educational; and to determine if utility and enhanced knowledge were associated with the implementation of measures to prevent work-related risk factors. Finally, it aimed to determine if the managers in the intervention groups to a greater extent than the controls reported implementing such measures.

RESULTS

Managers and employee representatives in both intervention groups reported a high level of perceived utility as well as a high level of enhanced knowledge. Both utility (p < 0.05) and enhanced knowledge (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with the implementation of, or plans to soon implement, measures to improve working conditions. When compared to controls, implemented measures, or plans to implement measures, were reported significantly more frequently by managers in the inspection group (p < 0.05). Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03855163 Registered on February 26, 2019.

摘要

目的

对于管理者和员工代表应对针对与工作相关的心理社会和人体工效学风险因素的劳动监察干预的方式,目前尚存在研究空白。本研究旨在确定(I)劳动监察和(II)由监察员主导的以工作为导向的研讨会,是否被目标人群视为同样有用和具有教育意义;并确定效用和知识增强是否与预防与工作相关的风险因素的措施的实施相关。最后,它旨在确定干预组的管理者是否比对照组更有可能报告实施这些措施。

结果

两个干预组的管理者和员工代表都报告了高度的感知效用以及高度的知识增强。效用(p<0.05)和增强的知识(p<0.05)均与实施或计划尽快实施改善工作条件的措施显著相关。与对照组相比,监管组的管理者报告实施的措施或计划实施的措施明显更多(p<0.05)。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03855163,于 2019 年 2 月 26 日注册。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Common mental disorders and cause-specific disability retirement.常见精神障碍与特定病因的病退
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Mar;72(3):181-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102432. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验