Gjertsen Finn, Lund Johan, Wergeland Ebba
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Retired from the Norwegian Directorate of Health, Norway.
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 2;4:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100072. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Globally, work-related deaths (injuries and diseases) are a major social and public health problem. Register data on fatal occupational injuries in high-income countries may be considered to have high quality, especially when reporting is mandatory and regulated by law. We aimed to assess the accuracy of work-related injury death statistics in Norway, with reference to the Labour Inspection Authority and three other on-going registration systems (the cause-specific mortality register, the register for governmental compensations, and the register for insurance companies).
In this register-based study, we used the capture-recapture technique to adjust for undercounting. We investigated whether the capture-recapture method using two or three sources gave a valid estimate of fatal occupational injuries as compared with the number of cases identified in four registers administrated by the Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority, Statistics Norway, the Labour and Welfare Administration, and Finance Norway. The inclusion criteria were fatal unintentional injuries among residents of Norway between 2000 and 2003 that occurred while working for income in private and public land-based industries. We obtained ethical and legal approvals.
In a period of four years (2000-2003), the Labour Inspection Authority registered 171 occupational injury deaths among residents employed in land-based industries. Two combinations of data sources gave capture-recapture estimates of 246 [95% CI 216; 279] and 265 [95% CI 234; 299] deaths. In total, 246 cases were identified in the four registration systems, which was 44% higher than the number of deaths registered by the Labour Inspection Authority. The Labour Inspection Authority had the most complete register out of the four registration systems.
The capture-recapture method used on two overlapping data sources gave highly valid estimates of the total deaths. We demonstrated the existence of significant weaknesses in the registration systems in a country considered to have high-quality register data.
在全球范围内,与工作相关的死亡(包括受伤和疾病)是一个重大的社会和公共卫生问题。高收入国家关于致命职业伤害的登记数据可能被认为质量较高,尤其是当报告是强制性的且受法律规范时。我们旨在参照劳动监察局以及其他三个正在运行的登记系统(死因特异性死亡登记册、政府赔偿登记册和保险公司登记册)评估挪威与工作相关的伤害死亡统计数据的准确性。
在这项基于登记册的研究中,我们使用捕获再捕获技术来校正计数不足的情况。我们调查了与挪威劳动监察局、挪威统计局、劳动和福利管理局以及挪威财政部管理的四个登记册中确定的病例数相比,使用两个或三个数据源的捕获再捕获方法对致命职业伤害的估计是否有效。纳入标准为2000年至2003年期间挪威居民在为私营和公共陆地产业赚取收入工作时发生的非故意致命伤害。我们获得了伦理和法律批准。
在四年期间(2000 - 2003年),劳动监察局登记了171例陆地产业就业居民的职业伤害死亡病例。两种数据源组合得出的捕获再捕获估计死亡数分别为246例[95%置信区间216;279]和265例[95%置信区间234;299]。在四个登记系统中总共确定了246例病例,比劳动监察局登记的死亡数高44%。在四个登记系统中,劳动监察局的登记册最完整。
对两个重叠数据源使用捕获再捕获方法对总死亡数给出了高度有效的估计值。我们证明了在一个被认为拥有高质量登记数据的国家,登记系统存在重大缺陷。