Bättig Linda, Dünner Corinne, Cserpan Dorottya, Rüegger Andrea, Hagmann Cornelia, Schmitt Bernhard, Pisani Francesco, Ramantani Georgia
Department of Neuropediatrics, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Jan;138:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
Although phenobarbital (PB) is commonly used as a first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for neonatal seizures, in 2015 we chose to replace it with levetiracetam (LEV), a third-generation ASM. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of LEV and PB as first-line ASM, considering the years before and after modifying our treatment protocol.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 108 neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed seizures treated with first-line LEV or PB in 2012 to 2020.
First-line ASM was LEV in 33 (31%) and PB in 75 (69%) neonates. The etiology included acute symptomatic seizures in 69% of cases (30% hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, 32% structural vascular, 6% infectious, otherwise metabolic) and neonatal epilepsy in 22% (5% structural due to brain malformation, 17% genetic). Forty-two of 108 (39%) neonates reached seizure freedom following first-line therapy. Treatment response did not vary by first-line ASM among all neonates, those with acute symptomatic seizures, or those with neonatal-onset epilepsy. Treatment response was lowest for neonates with a higher seizure frequency, particularly for those with status epilepticus versus rare seizures (P < 0.001), irrespective of gestational age, etiology, or EEG findings. Adverse events were noted in 22 neonates treated with PB and in only one treated with LEV (P < 0.001).
Our study suggests a potential noninferiority and a more acceptable safety profile for LEV, which may thus be a reasonable option as first-line ASM for neonatal seizures in place of PB. Treatment should be initiated as early as possible since higher seizure frequencies predispose to less favorable responses.
尽管苯巴比妥(PB)通常被用作新生儿惊厥的一线抗癫痫药物(ASM),但在2015年我们选择用第三代ASM左乙拉西坦(LEV)来取代它。在此,我们比较了LEV和PB作为一线ASM的安全性和有效性,并考虑了修改治疗方案前后的年份。
我们对2012年至2020年期间108例经脑电图(EEG)确诊惊厥并接受一线LEV或PB治疗的新生儿进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
33例(31%)新生儿的一线ASM为LEV,75例(69%)为PB。病因包括69%的病例为急性症状性惊厥(30%为缺氧缺血性脑病,32%为结构性血管病变,6%为感染性,其他为代谢性),22%为新生儿癫痫(5%为脑畸形导致的结构性病变,17%为遗传性)。108例新生儿中有42例(39%)在一线治疗后实现惊厥缓解。在所有新生儿、急性症状性惊厥患儿或新生儿期起病的癫痫患儿中,治疗反应并不因一线ASM的不同而有所差异。惊厥发作频率较高尤其是癫痫持续状态的新生儿与发作稀少的新生儿相比,治疗反应最差(P < 0.001),与胎龄、病因或EEG结果无关。接受PB治疗的22例新生儿和仅1例接受LEV治疗的新生儿出现了不良事件(P < 0.001)。
我们的研究表明LEV可能具有非劣效性且安全性更易接受,因此作为新生儿惊厥的一线ASM替代PB可能是一个合理的选择。由于较高的惊厥发作频率预示着反应较差,应尽早开始治疗。