• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放疗技术(调强放疗与三维适形放疗)对肛门癌急性毒性和生存预后因素的影响。

Influence of radiation treatment technique (IMRT vs. 3D-RT) on acute toxicity and prognostic factors for survival for anal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany.

Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19914. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24362-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-24362-8
PMID:36402828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9675840/
Abstract

We compared our institutional experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-RT) for definitive treatment of primary anal cancer. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of all patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive (chemo) radiotherapy with curative intent from 2004 through 2018. We assessed several prognostic factors in respect to relevant survival endpoints. In addition, acute toxicities were determined and compared between IMRT and 3D-RT patients. This study included 94 patients (58 IMRT, 36 3D-RT). Mean follow up for all patients, for IMRT and 3D-RT patients was 61 months (range 6-176), 46 months (range 6-118), and 85 months (range 6-176), respectively. 5-year overall survival (OS) was 86%, disease-free survival (DFS) was 72%, and colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 75% in the IMRT cohort. In the 3D-RT cohort, OS was 87%, DFS was 71%, and CFS was 81% (all p > 0.05). Male gender and Karnofsky Index (KI) were revealed as independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS (p = 0.017; p = 0.023). UICC stage was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and CFS (p = 0.023; p = 0.042). In addition, the pre-treatment leukocyte count was an independent prognostic factor for CFS (p = 0.042). Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity was not significantly different between IMRT and 3D-RT patients, but the IMRT cohort had favorable outcomes. This study confirmed IMRT as the primary definitive treatment of anal cancer. With similar survival rates, IMRT had the potential to reduce acute toxicity by sparing organs at risk. Promising prognostic factors such as BMI, KI, and leucocyte and hemoglobin levels should be further investigated.

摘要

我们比较了我们机构在使用调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3D-RT)治疗原发性肛门癌的经验。我们对 2004 年至 2018 年期间接受根治性(化疗)放疗的所有肛门鳞癌患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。我们评估了几个与相关生存终点相关的预后因素。此外,我们还比较了 IMRT 和 3D-RT 患者之间的急性毒性。这项研究共纳入 94 例患者(58 例 IMRT,36 例 3D-RT)。所有患者、IMRT 患者和 3D-RT 患者的中位随访时间分别为 61 个月(范围 6-176)、46 个月(范围 6-118)和 85 个月(范围 6-176)。IMRT 组的 5 年总生存率(OS)为 86%,无病生存率(DFS)为 72%,无造口生存率(CFS)为 75%。3D-RT 组的 OS 为 87%,DFS 为 71%,CFS 为 81%(均 P>0.05)。男性和 Karnofsky 指数(KI)是 5 年 OS 的独立预后因素(P=0.017;P=0.023)。UICC 分期是 DFS 和 CFS 的独立预后因素(P=0.023;P=0.042)。此外,治疗前白细胞计数是 CFS 的独立预后因素(P=0.042)。IMRT 和 3D-RT 患者的急性 3 级及以上毒性无显著差异,但 IMRT 组的结局较好。这项研究证实了 IMRT 是肛门癌的主要根治性治疗方法。IMRT 通过保护危及器官,具有降低急性毒性的潜力,同时也能获得相似的生存率。BMI、KI、白细胞和血红蛋白水平等有前途的预后因素应进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/68f7dcdfe053/41598_2022_24362_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/6158da1026c6/41598_2022_24362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/22fc20e3154c/41598_2022_24362_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/68f7dcdfe053/41598_2022_24362_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/6158da1026c6/41598_2022_24362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/22fc20e3154c/41598_2022_24362_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afa/9675840/68f7dcdfe053/41598_2022_24362_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of radiation treatment technique (IMRT vs. 3D-RT) on acute toxicity and prognostic factors for survival for anal cancer.放疗技术(调强放疗与三维适形放疗)对肛门癌急性毒性和生存预后因素的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19914. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24362-8.
2
Improved treatment outcome and lower skin toxicity with intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. 3D conventional radiotherapy in anal cancer.调强放疗与三维常规放疗治疗肛门癌的疗效和皮肤毒性比较。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Apr;196(4):356-367. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01534-6. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer--a retrospective analysis.肛管癌患者放化疗的疗效与毒性——一项回顾性分析
Radiat Oncol. 2014 May 13;9:113. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-113.
4
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves survival and reduces treatment time in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: A National Cancer Data Base study.调强放疗可改善肛门鳞癌患者的生存并缩短治疗时间:一项国家癌症数据库研究。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4383-4392. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31721. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
5
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Toxicities.调强放疗与三维适形放疗在颈段食管鳞癌根治性放化疗中的应用:生存结局和毒性比较。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):31-40. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.624. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Outcomes after intensity-modulated compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal.调强放疗与化疗联合 3 维适形放疗治疗肛管鳞癌的疗效比较。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):e515-e521. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4311. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Does gap-free intensity modulated chemoradiation therapy provide a greater clinical benefit than 3D conformal chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer?无间隙调强适形放化疗是否比三维适形放化疗为肛门癌患者带来更大的临床获益?
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 29;7:201. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-201.
8
Clinical analysis of conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.复发性卵巢癌患者适形调强放疗的临床分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 14;10(1):17172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74356-7.
9
Prospective evaluation of acute toxicity and quality of life after IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy for anal canal and perianal cancer.肛管和肛周癌调强放疗与同步化疗后急性毒性和生活质量的前瞻性评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.061. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
10
Involved-site image-guided intensity modulated versus 3D conformal radiation therapy in early stage supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma.累及野影像引导调强放疗与三维适形放疗在膈上早期霍奇金淋巴瘤中的应用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 1;89(2):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity and inclusivity in oncology: A narrative review and orientation for institutional measures in Germany.肿瘤学中的多样性与包容性:德国机构措施的叙述性综述与指南
Transl Oncol. 2025 Oct;60:102493. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102493. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
2
Anal carcinoma - exploring the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.肛管癌——探索其流行病学、危险因素、病理生理学、诊断及治疗。
World J Exp Med. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):98525. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i3.98525.
3
Recent Advances in the Management of Anal Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life in patients treated with radiochemotherapy for primary diagnosis of anal cancer.原发肛门癌调强放化疗患者的生活质量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08525-1.
2
The Impact of Pelvic Nodal Radiotherapy on Hematologic Toxicity: A Systematic Review with Focus on Leukopenia, Lymphopenia and Future Perspectives in Prostate Cancer Treatment.盆腔淋巴结放疗对血液学毒性的影响:一项系统性综述,重点关注前列腺癌治疗中的白细胞减少症、淋巴细胞减少症及未来展望。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Dec;168:103497. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103497. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
3
Results of Tri-Modality Therapy for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients.
肛管癌治疗的最新进展
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;11(23):3010. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11233010.
老年直肠癌患者的三联疗法治疗结果。
Anticancer Res. 2019 Nov;39(11):6217-6222. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13830.
4
Human Papillomavirus and Anal Cancer: Prevalence, Genotype Distribution, and Prognosis Aspects from Midwestern Region of Brazil.人乳头瘤病毒与肛门癌:巴西中西部地区的患病率、基因型分布及预后情况
J Oncol. 2019 Sep 18;2019:6018269. doi: 10.1155/2019/6018269. eCollection 2019.
5
Have we achieved adequate recommendations for target volume definitions in anal cancer? A PET imaging based patterns of failure analysis in the context of established contouring guidelines.我们是否已经为肛门癌的靶区定义提出了足够的建议?在既定勾画指南的背景下,基于 PET 成像的失败模式分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5970-0.
6
Quality of life in patients treated for anal carcinoma-a systematic literature review.肛门癌患者治疗后的生活质量:系统文献回顾。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Sep;34(9):1517-1528. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03342-x. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Immune inflammation indicators in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: training and validation cohort with online calculator (ARC: Anal Cancer Response Classifier).同步放化疗治疗的肛管癌患者的免疫炎症指标:使用在线计算器的训练和验证队列(ARC:肛管癌反应分类器)
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Apr 26;11:3631-3642. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S197349. eCollection 2019.
8
Management of acute radiation dermatitis: A review of the literature and proposal for treatment algorithm.急性放射性皮炎的管理:文献回顾与治疗算法的建议。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Aug;81(2):558-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.047. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review.放疗后肛门癌的迟发性胃肠道毒性:系统文献回顾。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Nov;57(11):1427-1437. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1503713. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
The prognostic role of hemoglobin levels in patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation for anal cancer.血红蛋白水平对接受同期放化疗的肛门癌患者的预后作用。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 May 2;13(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1035-9.