• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intuity TM心脏瓣膜的要点、陷阱及手术指征:一种快速植入生物假体。文献系统综述

Pearls, pitfalls, and surgical indications of the Intuity TM heart valve: A rapid deployment bioprosthesis. A systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Dokollari Aleksander, Torregrossa Gianluca, Sicouri Serge, Veshti Altin, Margaryan Rafik, Cameli Matteo, Mandoli Giulia Elena, Maccherini Massimo, Montesi Gianfranco, Cabrucci Francesco, Coku Lindita, Arora Rakesh, Li Qiao Ri, Bonacchi Massimo, Gelsomino Sandro

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Lankenau Heart Institute, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):5411-5417. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17231. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.17231
PMID:36403259
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To highlight short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the Intuity TM rapid deployment prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

We reviewed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SciELO, LILACS, CCTR/CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for clinical trials, retrospective clinical studies, meta-analysis, and gray literature.

RESULTS

Fourty-five clinical studies with 12.714 patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 3.8% for Intuity and 3.9% for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL) (Intuity 0% and TAVR 2.17%), permanent pacemaker implantation (Intuity 11.11% and TAVR 12.5%), stroke (Intuity 2.2% and TAVR 2.6%), myocardial infarction (MI) (Intuity 0% and TAVR 1%), were all higher in the TAVR group. Compared to other sutured bioprosthesis (SB), mortality ranged from 0% to 3.9% for Intuity and 0%-6.9% for SB. Long-term cardiac mortality ranged from 0.9% to 1.55% for Intuity and 1.4%-3.3% for the Perceval valve. The incidence of PVL (Intuity 0.24%-0.7% and Perceval 0%-1%), endocarditis (Intuity 0.2%-0.7% and Perceval 1.6%-6.6%), stroke (Intuity 0.36%-1.4% and Perceval 0%-0.8%), MI (Intuity 0.07%-0.26%), and SVD (Intuity 0.12%-0.7% and Perceval 0%) were comparable. Compared to standard full sternotomy (SFS), minimally invasive surgery (MINV) mortality ranged from 0% to 4.3% for MINV and 0%-2.1% for SFS. Hospital costs outcomes ranged from $37,187-$44,368 for the Intuity, $69,389 for TAVR, and $13,543 for SB. Intuity short-term mortality ranged between 0.9% and 12.4% while long-term mortality ranged between 2.6% and 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript provides a 360° overview of the current rapid deployments, sutureless, and TAVR prosthesis.

摘要

目的

强调用于外科主动脉瓣置换的Intuity TM快速部署人工瓣膜的短期和长期临床结果。

方法

我们在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、SciELO、LILACS、CCTR/CENTRAL和谷歌学术上检索了临床试验、回顾性临床研究、荟萃分析和灰色文献。

结果

分析纳入了45项临床研究,共12714例患者。Intuity组30天死亡率为3.8%,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)组为3.9%。瓣周漏(PVL)发生率(Intuity组为0%,TAVR组为2.17%)、永久起搏器植入率(Intuity组为11.11%,TAVR组为12.5%)、中风发生率(Intuity组为2.2%,TAVR组为2.6%)、心肌梗死(MI)发生率(Intuity组为0%,TAVR组为1%),均是TAVR组更高。与其他缝合生物瓣膜(SB)相比,Intuity的死亡率为0%至3.9%,SB为0%至6.9%。Intuity的长期心脏死亡率为0.9%至1.55%,Perceval瓣膜为1.4%至3.3%。PVL发生率(Intuity为0.24%至0.7%,Perceval为0%至1%)、心内膜炎发生率(Intuity为0.2%至0.7%,Perceval为1.6%至6.6%)、中风发生率(Intuity为0.36%至1.4%,Perceval为0%至0.8%)、MI发生率(Intuity为0.07%至0.26%)和结构性瓣膜衰败(SVD)发生率(Intuity为0.12%至0.7%,Perceval为0%)相当。与标准全胸骨切开术(SFS)相比,微创手术(MINV)死亡率MINV为0%至4.3%,SFS为0%至2.1%。Intuity的住院费用为37187美元至44368美元,TAVR为69389美元,SB为13543美元。Intuity的短期死亡率在0.9%至12.4%之间,长期死亡率在2.6%至20%之间。

结论

本手稿全面概述了当前的快速部署、无缝合和TAVR人工瓣膜。

相似文献

1
Pearls, pitfalls, and surgical indications of the Intuity TM heart valve: A rapid deployment bioprosthesis. A systematic review of the literature.Intuity TM心脏瓣膜的要点、陷阱及手术指征:一种快速植入生物假体。文献系统综述
J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):5411-5417. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17231. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
2
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
3
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing 3 Aortic Valve Interventions: The THIRD Multicenter Registry.接受3种主动脉瓣干预治疗患者的临床特征与结局:THIRD多中心注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.037.
4
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术与再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jul;36(7):2486-2495. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15546. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
Surgical Bailout in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Incidence, Trends, and Clinical Outcomes.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的外科补救措施:发生率、趋势及临床结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.050.
6
Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中经瓣植入 versus 再次外科主动脉瓣置换术的肾脏结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3743-3753. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16890. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
7
Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗失败的外科生物瓣的再次手术主动脉瓣置换术与再次手术主动脉瓣置换术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e7965. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024848. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.新一代生物假体主动脉瓣置换术:无缝合与快速部署。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):432-442.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.135. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Diabetes is associated with a higher incidence of short-term mortality risk and readmission in patients who undergo surgical but not transcatheter aortic valve replacement.糖尿病与接受外科手术而非经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者短期死亡风险和再入院发生率较高相关。
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 11;12(1):e003019. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003019.
10
Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis.Perceval无缝合生物假体的益处与缺陷
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 5;8:789392. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.789392. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Not All SAVR Are Created Equal: All the Approaches Available for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.并非所有的外科主动脉瓣置换术都一样:外科主动脉瓣置换术的所有可用方法。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 24;12(3):84. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030084.
2
Bioprosthetic Valves for Lifetime Management of Aortic Stenosis: Pearls and Pitfalls.用于主动脉瓣狭窄终身管理的生物人工瓣膜:要点与陷阱
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 13;12(22):7063. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227063.
3
Early and Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Sutureless vs. Sutured Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement.
无缝合生物瓣膜与缝合生物瓣膜用于主动脉瓣置换的早期及长期临床和超声心动图结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 May 22;10(5):224. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10050224.