Cairoli Elisa, Grassi Giorgia, Gaudio Agostino, Palermo Andrea, Vescini Fabio, Falchetti Alberto, Merlotti Daniela, Eller-Vainicher Cristina, Carnevale Vincenzo, Scillitani Alfredo, Rendina Domenico, Salcuni Antonio S, Cenci Simone, Chiodini Iacopo, Gennari Luigi
Unit for Bone Metabolism Diseases and Diabetes, Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy; Laboratory of Endocrine and Metabolic Research, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Unit of Endocrinology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Jan;33(1):158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
Bone fragility is recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the fracture risk in T2D is underestimated using the classical assessment tools. An expert panel suggested the diagnostic approaches for the detection of T2D patients worthy of bone-active treatment. The aim of the study was to apply these algorithms to a cohort of T2D women to validate them in clinical practice.
The presence of T2D-specific fracture risk factors (T2D ≥ 10 years, ≥1 T2D complications, insulin or thiazolidinedione use, poor glycaemic control) was assessed at baseline in 107 postmenopausal T2D women. In all patients at baseline and in 34 patients after a median follow-up of 60.2 months we retrospectively evaluated bone mineral density and clinical and morphometric vertebral fractures. No patient was treated with bone-active drug. Following the protocols, 34 (31.8%) and 73 (68.2%) patients would have been pharmacologically and conservatively treated, respectively. Among 49 patients without both clinical fractures and major T2D-related risk factors, who would have been, therefore, conservatively followed-up without vertebral fracture assessment, only one showed a prevalent vertebral fracture (sensitivity 90%, negative predictive value 98%). The two patients who experienced an incident fracture would have been pharmacologically treated at baseline.
The clinical consensus recommendations showed a very good sensitivity in identifying T2D postmenopausal women at high fracture risk. Among those with treatment indication as many as 13% of patients experienced an incident fracture, and, conversely, among those without treatment indication no incident fractures were observed.
骨脆性被认为是2型糖尿病(T2D)的一种并发症。然而,使用经典评估工具会低估T2D患者的骨折风险。一个专家小组提出了检测值得进行骨活性治疗的T2D患者的诊断方法。本研究的目的是将这些算法应用于一组T2D女性患者,以在临床实践中对其进行验证。
在107名绝经后T2D女性患者基线时评估是否存在T2D特异性骨折风险因素(T2D病程≥10年、≥1种T2D并发症、使用胰岛素或噻唑烷二酮类药物、血糖控制不佳)。在所有患者基线时以及34名患者中位随访60.2个月后,我们回顾性评估了骨密度以及临床和形态计量学椎体骨折情况。没有患者接受骨活性药物治疗。按照方案,分别有34名(31.8%)和73名(68.2%)患者将接受药物治疗和保守治疗。在49名既无临床骨折也无主要T2D相关风险因素的患者中,因此原本会在不进行椎体骨折评估的情况下进行保守随访,其中只有1名患者存在椎体骨折(敏感性90%,阴性预测值98%)。发生新发骨折的2名患者在基线时就会接受药物治疗。
临床共识建议在识别高骨折风险的绝经后T2D女性方面显示出非常好的敏感性。在有治疗指征的患者中,多达13%的患者发生了新发骨折,相反,在无治疗指征的患者中未观察到新发骨折。