Marwaha Raman Kumar, Verma Manish, Walekar Ajit, Sonawane Rakesh, Trivedi Chirag
Consultant Endocrinologist and President, Society of Endocrine Health Care for Elderly, Adolescents and Children (SEHEAC), 92E/I, Ground Floor, Munirka Market, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Medical Affairs, CHC, Sanofi India Limited, Sanofi House, CTS No.117-B, L&T Business Park, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Mumbai, 400072, India.
J Orthop. 2022 Nov 4;35:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.10.017. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Nanoemulsion preparations of cholecalciferol available in the market claim to have better bioavailability than the conventional fat-soluble cholecalciferol. However, limited data are available in humans for such preparations. We, therefore, compared the relative bioavailability of two formulations of 60,000 IU cholecalciferol (nanoemulsion oral solution, water-miscible vitamin D3 [test] vs soft gelatin capsules [reference]) in healthy adult participants.
In this randomized, open-label, two sequence, single-dose, two-way crossover study (CTRI/2018/05/013839), Indian participants aged 18-45 years received single dose of nanoemulsion and capsule formulations, under fasting conditions. Blood samples collected over 120 h were assessed to determine cholecalciferol concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the concentration-time curve up to 120 h [AUC], maximum observed drug concentration [C], time to reach maximum drug concentration [T], terminal half-life [T], and terminal elimination rate constant [K]) were estimated using baseline corrected data and analyzed using analysis of variance.
Among the 24 eligible participants, the relative bioavailability of nanoemulsion was significantly higher than the capsules by 36% (p = 0.0001) based on AUC. Similarly, C of the nanoemulsion was significantly higher by 43% (p = 0.0001) than that of the capsules. The intra-participant variability for AUC and C were 23.22% and 26.51%, respectively. The T, T, and K were comparable for both the formulations. No adverse effects were noted with either of the two formulations.
Nanoemulsion oral solution of cholecalciferol showed a greater bioavailability compared with soft gelatin capsules, under fasting conditions, in healthy human participants.
市场上的胆钙化醇纳米乳剂制剂声称比传统的脂溶性胆钙化醇具有更好的生物利用度。然而,关于此类制剂在人体中的数据有限。因此,我们比较了两种60,000 IU胆钙化醇制剂(纳米乳剂口服溶液,水溶性维生素D3[试验组]与软胶囊[参照组])在健康成年受试者中的相对生物利用度。
在这项随机、开放标签、双序列、单剂量、双向交叉研究(CTRI/2018/05/013839)中,18至45岁的印度受试者在禁食条件下接受单剂量的纳米乳剂和胶囊制剂。收集120小时内的血样以测定胆钙化醇浓度。使用基线校正数据估计药代动力学参数(至120小时的浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC]、最大观察到的药物浓度[C]、达到最大药物浓度的时间[T]、末端半衰期[T]和末端消除速率常数[K]),并使用方差分析进行分析。
在24名符合条件的受试者中,基于AUC,纳米乳剂的相对生物利用度比胶囊显著高36%(p = 0.0001)。同样,纳米乳剂的C比胶囊显著高43%(p = 0.0001)。AUC和C的受试者内变异性分别为23.22%和26.51%。两种制剂的T、T和K相当。两种制剂均未观察到不良反应。
在禁食条件下,健康人体受试者中,胆钙化醇纳米乳剂口服溶液比软胶囊显示出更高的生物利用度。