Li Bing, Yang Zhaofu
College of Plant Protection Northwest A&F University Yangling China.
Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Mangagement Northwest A&F University Yangling China.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e9504. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9504. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Tianshan Mountains provide a model for studying biological evolution and speciation. Here we assess the evolutionary history of (ACB) and (ECB), which are sympatric in the Yili River Valley in Xinjiang, China.Our study is based on the historical gene flow analyses of two species by using three mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA, , , ) and four nuclear DNA (nuDNA, , , , ) markers obtained from representatives of HC (Huocheng), YN (Yining), XY (Xinyuan), and MNS (Manasi).Our results reveal that there is an asymmetrical gene flow pattern between the four populations. The population migratory pathways between these different populations show inflow into HC and YN, outflow from XY, and that MNS maintained a flow balance. Bayesian divergence time dating based on the gene suggests that the genetic divergence between the two species in this area may have occurred in Holocene at 0.008 Mya. Neutrality tests (Tajima's , Fu's ), and mismatch distribution test results suggest that population expansion events may not have occurred in the recent past. The demographic history and gene flow pattern between ACB and ECB may follow the "mountain isolation" hypothesis. The ML and BI trees of the mtDNA haplotype dataset show that ECB haplotypes are grouped together in a distinct clade and are clearly separate from ACB haplotypes. However, the geographical pattern of haplotype distribution is less clear for both ACB and ECB, supporting that there has been frequent gene flow among the geographic populations in the Tianshan Mountains.These findings indicate that the Tianshan Mountains are less likely a barrier to gene flow of the two species.
天山山脉为研究生物进化和物种形成提供了一个模型。在此,我们评估了在中国新疆伊犁河谷同域分布的[某种生物A(ACB)]和[某种生物B(ECB)]的进化历史。我们的研究基于对这两个物种的历史基因流分析,使用了从霍城(HC)、伊宁(YN)、新源(XY)和玛纳斯(MNS)的代表样本中获得的三个线粒体DNA(mtDNA,[具体基因1]、[具体基因2]、[具体基因3])和四个核DNA(nuDNA,[具体基因4]、[具体基因5]、[具体基因6]、[具体基因7])标记。我们的结果显示,这四个种群之间存在不对称的基因流模式。这些不同种群之间的种群迁移路径显示,基因流入HC和YN,从XY流出,而MNS保持了流动平衡。基于[某个基因]的贝叶斯分歧时间测定表明,该地区这两个物种之间的遗传分歧可能发生在全新世,时间为距今0.008百万年。中性检验( Tajima's [检验方法1]、Fu's [检验方法2])以及失配分布检验结果表明,近期可能未发生种群扩张事件。ACB和ECB之间的种群历史和基因流模式可能遵循“山脉隔离”假说。mtDNA单倍型数据集的最大似然法(ML)和贝叶斯推断(BI)树显示,ECB单倍型聚集在一个独特的分支中,与ACB单倍型明显分开。然而,ACB和ECB的单倍型地理分布模式都不太清晰,这支持了天山山脉不同地理种群之间存在频繁基因流的观点。这些发现表明,天山山脉不太可能成为这两个物种基因流的障碍。