Suppr超能文献

审查和惩罚言论自由是不道德的:对杰克逊(2022 年)和史密斯(2022 年)的回应。

Censoring and punishing free speech is unethical: Reply to Jackson (2022) and Smith (2022).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2022 Nov;77(8):892-893. doi: 10.1037/amp0001040.

Abstract

The ethically proper response to problematic speech is more speech and not censorship. To the extent that Jackson (2022) and Smith (2022) advocate for all to be able to criticize all, for example, for unempowered undergraduates to criticize privileged White male professors or for anyone to criticize racist or hate speech, we are in agreement. The speech involved in criticism can be risky and hence ought to be protected by the (American Psychological Association, 2017). However, except in very circumscribed circumstances, to the extent that Jackson or Smith advocate for acts such as the suppression, censorship, or punishment of speech, we are in disagreement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

对于有问题的言论,合乎道德的恰当回应是更多的言论,而不是审查。例如,在杰克逊(2022)和史密斯(2022)都主张所有人都能够批评所有人的范围内,允许没有权力的本科生批评享有特权的白人男性教授,或者任何人都能够批评种族主义或仇恨言论,我们是一致的。批评所涉及的言论可能有风险,因此应该受到(美国心理协会,2017)的保护。然而,除非在非常有限的情况下,杰克逊或史密斯主张压制、审查或惩罚言论等行为,我们是不同意的。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验