Cecchin D, Farina A P, Vidal Cmp, Bedran-Russo A K
Oper Dent. 2018 Jan/Feb;43(1):101-110. doi: 10.2341/16-136-L.
To determine the use of α-hydroxy glycolic acid (GA) as a surface pretreatment for dental restorative applications. The etching pattern of GA pretreatment of dental hard tissues was assessed by surface microhardness and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The effectiveness of GA surface etching on the enamel and dentin resin bond strengths was assessed using two etchant application modes (rubbing and no rubbing) and three adhesive systems (Single Bond [SB], One Step Plus [OSP], and Scotchbond Universal [SBU]).
Knoop microhardness measurements were carried out on polished enamel and dentin surfaces before and after treatment with 35% GA, 35% phosphoric acid (PA), or distilled water (control group) for 30 seconds. The microtensile bond strength test was carried out on enamel and dentin. Ultrastructural analysis of the surface and interfacial interaction was qualitatively accomplished using SEM.
Etching with either PA or GA significantly decreased the enamel microhardness, with GA being significantly less aggressive than PA ( p<0.001), while both acids showed similar decreases in dentin microhardness ( p=0.810). SEM revealed similar etching patterns of GA and PA, while apparently a thinner hybrid layer was observed for GA groups. In dentin, the bond strengths were statistically similar between PA and GA groups, regardless of the etchant application mode ( p>0.05). However, rubbing of GA enhanced the bond strength to enamel. PA and GA significantly increased the SBU bond strength to enamel when compared to SB and OSP ( p<0.05).
GA effectively etched enamel and dentin surfaces, resulting in bond strength values similar to those associated with traditional PA. GA is a suitable enamel and dentin surface etchant for adhesive restorative procedures.
确定α-羟基乙醇酸(GA)作为牙科修复应用表面预处理剂的用途。通过表面显微硬度和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估GA对牙硬组织预处理的蚀刻模式。使用两种蚀刻剂应用模式(擦拭和不擦拭)和三种粘结系统(单键粘结剂[SB]、一步加粘结剂[OSP]和3M通用粘结剂[SBU])评估GA表面蚀刻对釉质和牙本质树脂粘结强度的有效性。
在经35%GA、35%磷酸(PA)或蒸馏水(对照组)处理30秒的抛光釉质和牙本质表面上进行努氏显微硬度测量。在釉质和牙本质上进行微拉伸粘结强度测试。使用SEM对表面和界面相互作用进行超微结构定性分析。
用PA或GA蚀刻均显著降低了釉质显微硬度,其中GA的侵蚀性明显低于PA(p<0.001),而两种酸对牙本质显微硬度的降低程度相似(p=0.810)。SEM显示GA和PA的蚀刻模式相似,而GA组的混合层明显更薄。在牙本质中,PA组和GA组之间的粘结强度在统计学上相似,与蚀刻剂应用模式无关(p>0.05)。然而,GA擦拭可增强与釉质的粘结强度。与SB和OSP相比,PA和GA显著提高了SBU与釉质的粘结强度(p<0.05)。
GA可有效蚀刻釉质和牙本质表面,产生与传统PA相似的粘结强度值。GA是用于粘结修复程序的合适釉质和牙本质表面蚀刻剂。