• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient and Community Organization Perspectives on Accessing Social Resources from the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.患者和社区组织对从急诊科获取社会资源的看法:一项定性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 24;21(4):964-973. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45932.
2
The influence of personal communities in understanding avoidable emergency department attendance: qualitative study.理解可避免急诊就诊的个人社区影响:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05705-5.
3
A preliminary report of knowledge translation: lessons from taking screening and brief intervention techniques from the research setting into regional systems of care.知识转化的初步报告:从研究环境到区域护理系统采用筛查和简短干预技术的经验教训。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00516.x.
4
Social determinants and emergency department utilization: Findings from the Veterans Health Administration.社会决定因素与急诊科利用:退伍军人健康管理局的研究结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1904-1909. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.078. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Part II: A Qualitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers.第二部分:患者和照护者对社会风险筛查可接受性的定性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S38-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.016.
6
A qualitative analysis of interprofessional healthcare team members' perceptions of patient barriers to healthcare engagement.对跨专业医疗团队成员对患者参与医疗保健的障碍认知的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1751-5.
7
Integrating social determinants of health screening and referral during routine emergency department care: evaluation of reach and implementation challenges.在常规急诊科护理中整合健康筛查和转诊的社会决定因素:对覆盖范围和实施挑战的评估
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Oct 7;2(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00212-y.
8
Predictors of emergency department and GP use among patients with mental health conditions: a public health survey.精神健康状况患者在急诊科和全科医生处就诊的预测因素:一项公众健康调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Dec 26;70(690):e1-e8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707093. Print 2020 Jan.
9
Improving Understanding of Screening Questions for Social Risk and Social Need Among Emergency Department Patients.提高对急诊科患者社会风险和社会需求筛查问题的理解。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 20;21(5):1170-1174. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.5.46536.
10
Reasons for Frequent Emergency Department Use by Medicaid Enrollees: A Qualitative Study.医疗补助计划参保者频繁使用急诊科的原因:一项定性研究
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):476-81. doi: 10.1111/acem.12952. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Nurses' Perspectives on Adopting Geriatric Screenings for Cognitive Impairment: A Qualitative Study.急诊护士对采用认知障碍老年筛查的看法:一项定性研究
J Emerg Nurs. 2025 May;51(3):398-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.010. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
2
Conceptualising social prescribing in urgent and emergency care.在紧急和急诊护理中对社会处方进行概念化。
Future Healthc J. 2024 Oct 21;11(4):100199. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100199. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
A family-centered approach to social needs awareness in the pediatric emergency department.一种以家庭为中心的方法来提高儿科急诊科对社会需求的认知。
PEC Innov. 2024 Apr 21;4:100283. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100283. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Missed Screening for Adverse Social Determinants of Health and Emergency Department Utilization.健康不良社会决定因素筛查缺失与急诊科利用情况
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;83(4):416-418. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Rural Veterans' Experiences with Social Risk Factors: Impacts, Challenges, and Care System Recommendations.农村退伍军人的社会风险因素体验:影响、挑战和护理系统建议。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Apr;39(5):782-789. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08530-8. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
2021 SAEM Consensus Conference Proceedings: Research Priorities for Implementing Emergency Department Screening for Social Risks and Needs.2021 年 SAEM 共识会议记录:实施急诊科社会风险和需求筛查的研究重点。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 24;24(2):302-311. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.10.57368.
7
Emergency provider perspectives on facilitators and barriers to home and community services for older adults with serious life limiting illness: A qualitative study.紧急医疗服务提供者对严重生命受限的老年患者的居家和社区服务的促进因素和障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0270961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270961. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient Preferences for Discussing and Acting on Health-Related Needs in Primary Care.患者对在初级保健中讨论和实施与健康相关需求的偏好。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221115946. doi: 10.1177/21501319221115946.
9
Patient views on emergency department screening and interventions related to housing.患者对急诊科与住房相关的筛查和干预措施的看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):589-597. doi: 10.1111/acem.14442. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The Baltimore Community-Based Organizations Neighborhood Network: Enhancing Capacity Together (CONNECT) Cluster RCT.巴尔的摩社区组织邻里网络:共同增强能力(CONNECT)集群 RCT。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):e31-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
2
Impact of Social Needs Navigation on Utilization Among High Utilizers in a Large Integrated Health System: a Quasi-experimental Study.社会需求导航对大型综合健康系统中高利用率人群利用情况的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2382-2389. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05123-2.
3
Addressing Health-Related Social Needs: Value-Based Care or Values-Based Care?解决与健康相关的社会需求:基于价值的医疗保健还是基于价值观的医疗保健?
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1916-1918. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05087-3. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems.意义与误解:医疗保健系统的健康决定因素词汇
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):407-419. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12390. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Infants Exposed To Homelessness: Health, Health Care Use, And Health Spending From Birth To Age Six.暴露于无家可归环境下的婴儿:从出生到 6 岁的健康状况、卫生保健服务使用情况和卫生支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 May;38(5):721-728. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00090.
6
Adoption of Social Determinants of Health EHR Tools by Community Health Centers.社区卫生中心采用健康电子病历中的社会决定因素工具。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Sep;16(5):399-407. doi: 10.1370/afm.2275.
7
Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research: interventions targeting social needs in pediatric clinical care.儿科研究学会观点:儿科临床护理中针对社会需求的干预措施。
Pediatr Res. 2018 Jul;84(1):10-21. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0012-1. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Material Needs of Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review.急诊科患者的物资需求:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):330-359. doi: 10.1111/acem.13370. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Community Health Worker Support for Disadvantaged Patients With Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者对患有多种慢性病的弱势患者的支持:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1660-1667. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303985. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
The Highland Health Advocates: a preliminary evaluation of a novel programme addressing the social needs of emergency department patients.高地健康倡导者:一项新型方案解决急诊患者社会需求的初步评估。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Sep;34(9):599-605. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205662. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

患者和社区组织对从急诊科获取社会资源的看法:一项定性研究。

Patient and Community Organization Perspectives on Accessing Social Resources from the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 24;21(4):964-973. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45932.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45932
PMID:32726271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7390556/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Social risks adversely affect health and are associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs. Emergency department (ED) patients have high rates of social risk; however, little is known about best practices for ED-based screening or linkage to community resources. We examined the perspectives of patients and community organizations regarding social risk screening and linkage from the ED.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of ED patients and local community organization staff. Participants completed a brief demographic survey, health literacy assessment, and qualitative interview focused on barriers/facilitators to social risk screening in the ED, and ideas for screening and linkage interventions in the ED. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish, recorded, transcribed, and coded. Themes were identified by consensus.

RESULTS

We conducted 22 interviews with 16 patients and six community organization staff. Three categories of themes emerged. The first related to the importance of social risk screening in the ED. The second category encompassed challenges regarding screening and linkage, including fear, mistrust, transmission of accurate information, and time/resource constraints. The third category included suggestions for improvement and program development. Patients had varied preferences for verbal vs electronic strategies for screening. Community organization staff emphasized resource scarcity and multimodal communication strategies.

CONCLUSION

The development of flexible, multimodal, social risk screening tools, and the creation and maintenance of an accurate database of local resources, are strategies that may facilitate improved identification of social risk and successful linkage to available community resources.

摘要

简介

社会风险会对健康产生不利影响,并与医疗保健利用率和成本的增加相关。急诊科(ED)患者的社会风险率很高;然而,关于 ED 基于筛查或与社区资源联系的最佳实践知之甚少。我们研究了患者和社区组织对 ED 中社会风险筛查和联系的看法。

方法

采用目的抽样法对 ED 患者和当地社区组织工作人员进行了定性访谈。参与者完成了一份简短的人口统计调查、健康素养评估以及一项关于 ED 中社会风险筛查的障碍/促进因素的定性访谈,并提出了 ED 中筛查和联系干预的想法。访谈以英语或西班牙语进行,录音、转录和编码。通过共识确定主题。

结果

我们对 16 名患者和 6 名社区组织工作人员进行了 22 次访谈。出现了三个类别的主题。第一个与 ED 中社会风险筛查的重要性有关。第二个类别包括筛查和联系方面的挑战,包括恐惧、不信任、准确信息的传递以及时间/资源限制。第三个类别包括改进和项目开发的建议。患者对口头与电子筛查策略有不同的偏好。社区组织工作人员强调资源稀缺和多模式沟通策略。

结论

开发灵活、多模式的社会风险筛查工具,以及创建和维护准确的本地资源数据库,是可能有助于改善社会风险识别和成功联系可用社区资源的策略。