Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston, Massachusetts.
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 24;21(4):964-973. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45932.
Social risks adversely affect health and are associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs. Emergency department (ED) patients have high rates of social risk; however, little is known about best practices for ED-based screening or linkage to community resources. We examined the perspectives of patients and community organizations regarding social risk screening and linkage from the ED.
Qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of ED patients and local community organization staff. Participants completed a brief demographic survey, health literacy assessment, and qualitative interview focused on barriers/facilitators to social risk screening in the ED, and ideas for screening and linkage interventions in the ED. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish, recorded, transcribed, and coded. Themes were identified by consensus.
We conducted 22 interviews with 16 patients and six community organization staff. Three categories of themes emerged. The first related to the importance of social risk screening in the ED. The second category encompassed challenges regarding screening and linkage, including fear, mistrust, transmission of accurate information, and time/resource constraints. The third category included suggestions for improvement and program development. Patients had varied preferences for verbal vs electronic strategies for screening. Community organization staff emphasized resource scarcity and multimodal communication strategies.
The development of flexible, multimodal, social risk screening tools, and the creation and maintenance of an accurate database of local resources, are strategies that may facilitate improved identification of social risk and successful linkage to available community resources.
社会风险会对健康产生不利影响,并与医疗保健利用率和成本的增加相关。急诊科(ED)患者的社会风险率很高;然而,关于 ED 基于筛查或与社区资源联系的最佳实践知之甚少。我们研究了患者和社区组织对 ED 中社会风险筛查和联系的看法。
采用目的抽样法对 ED 患者和当地社区组织工作人员进行了定性访谈。参与者完成了一份简短的人口统计调查、健康素养评估以及一项关于 ED 中社会风险筛查的障碍/促进因素的定性访谈,并提出了 ED 中筛查和联系干预的想法。访谈以英语或西班牙语进行,录音、转录和编码。通过共识确定主题。
我们对 16 名患者和 6 名社区组织工作人员进行了 22 次访谈。出现了三个类别的主题。第一个与 ED 中社会风险筛查的重要性有关。第二个类别包括筛查和联系方面的挑战,包括恐惧、不信任、准确信息的传递以及时间/资源限制。第三个类别包括改进和项目开发的建议。患者对口头与电子筛查策略有不同的偏好。社区组织工作人员强调资源稀缺和多模式沟通策略。
开发灵活、多模式的社会风险筛查工具,以及创建和维护准确的本地资源数据库,是可能有助于改善社会风险识别和成功联系可用社区资源的策略。