Aalami Amir Hossein, Aalami Farnoosh, Sahebkar Amirhossein
Department of Biology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Curr Med Chem. 2023;30(33):3798-3814. doi: 10.2174/0929867330666221121155905.
Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are now used as noninvasive diagnostic indicators in various malignancies.
Our objective is to use a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs in gastric cancer.
We reviewed databases and methodically obtained papers for analysis until October 15th, 2021. The random-effect meta-analysis was performed to construct pooled diagnostic parameters. To detect the causes of heterogeneity, spearman threshold effect analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. The I and Chi-square tests were also used to examine the heterogeneity. The subgroup analyses were conducted based on sample types (serum/plasma/blood), normalized genes (U6, miR-16, and miR-39), qPCR mastermix (SYBR and Taqman), and country. Finally, the publication bias was estimated using Egger's funnel plot asymmetry test.
A total of 40 articles covering 73 studies (59 microRNAs) were included, containing 11,022 participants (6,324 cases and 4,698 controls). The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.74-0.77), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.80), 4.081 (95% CI: 3.43-4.85), 0.28 (95% CI: 0.25-0.32), 16.08 (95% CI: 12.34-20.95), and 0.877 (CI: 0.84-0.90), respectively. We conducted a subgroup analysis of diagnostic values, which revealed that serum type, U6 reference gene, SYBR mastermix, and East Asian Countries (China and Japan) had better diagnostic value.
Circulating miRs can serve as diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer. However, specific miRNAs still need to be discovered in diagnosing gastric cancer, especially early screening.
循环微RNA(miRNA,miR)目前被用作各种恶性肿瘤的非侵入性诊断指标。
我们的目的是通过荟萃分析评估循环miRNA在胃癌中的诊断性能。
我们检索了数据库,并系统地获取论文进行分析,截至2021年10月15日。采用随机效应荟萃分析构建合并诊断参数。为检测异质性原因,进行了斯皮尔曼阈值效应分析和亚组分析。还使用I²和卡方检验来检验异质性。亚组分析基于样本类型(血清/血浆/血液)、标准化基因(U6、miR-16和miR-39)、qPCR预混液(SYBR和Taqman)以及国家进行。最后,使用Egger漏斗图不对称性检验估计发表偏倚。
共纳入40篇文章,涵盖73项研究(59种微RNA),包含11,022名参与者(6,324例病例和4,698例对照)。总体合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断比值比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.75(95%CI:0.74 - 0.77)、0.79(95%CI:0.78 - 0.80)、4.081(95%CI:3.43 - 4.85)、0.28(95%CI:0.25 - 0.32)、16.08(95%CI:12.34 - 20.95)和0.877(CI:0.84 - 0.90)。我们对诊断价值进行了亚组分析,结果显示血清类型、U6参考基因、SYBR预混液以及东亚国家(中国和日本)具有更好的诊断价值。
循环miR可作为胃癌的诊断生物标志物。然而,在胃癌诊断尤其是早期筛查中仍需发现特定的miRNA。