Annis Water Resources Institute, Grand Valley State University, 740 West Shoreline Drive, Muskegon, MI 49441, USA.
Biology Department, Grand Valley State University, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI 49401, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2023 Feb 10;116(1):168-180. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac175.
Hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA), Adelges tsugae Annand, threatens hemlock forests throughout eastern North America. Management efforts focus on early detection of HWA to ensure rapid management responses to control and stop the spread of this pest. This study's goal was to identify an affordable, efficient trap to aid with airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling approaches as an early monitoring tool for HWA. We initially compared HWA detection success between a standard sticky trap, commonly used for HWA monitoring, and trap designs potentially compatible with eDNA protocols (i.e., passive trap, funnel trap, and motorized trap). Passive, funnel, and motorized traps' estimated capture success probabilities compared to sticky traps were 0.87, 0.8, and 0.4, respectively. A secondary evaluation of a modified version of the motorized trap further assessed trap performance and determined the number of traps needed in a set area to efficiently detect HWA. By modifying the original motorized trap design, its estimated capture success probability increased to 0.67 compared to a sticky trap. Overall, the cumulative capture success over the 16-week sampling period for the motorized trap was 94% and 99% for the sticky trap. The number of traps did impact capture success, and trap elevation and distance to infested hemlocks influenced the number of adelgids captured per trap. As eDNA-based monitoring approaches continue to become incorporated into invasive species surveying, further refinement with these types of traps can be useful as an additional tool in the manager's toolbox.
铁杉卷叶象鼻虫(HWA),Adelges tsugae Annand,威胁着整个北美东部的铁杉林。管理工作侧重于早期发现 HWA,以确保快速管理响应,控制和阻止这种害虫的传播。本研究的目的是确定一种经济实惠、高效的诱捕器,以辅助空中环境 DNA(eDNA)采样方法,作为 HWA 的早期监测工具。我们最初比较了标准粘性诱捕器(通常用于 HWA 监测)和可能与 eDNA 协议兼容的诱捕器设计(即被动诱捕器、漏斗诱捕器和机动诱捕器)之间的 HWA 检测成功率。与粘性诱捕器相比,被动、漏斗和机动诱捕器的估计捕获成功率分别为 0.87、0.8 和 0.4。对机动诱捕器的改良版本进行了二次评估,进一步评估了诱捕器的性能,并确定了在设定区域内需要设置多少个诱捕器以有效地检测 HWA。通过修改原始机动诱捕器设计,其与粘性诱捕器相比,估计捕获成功率增加到 0.67。总体而言,在 16 周的采样期内,机动诱捕器的累积捕获成功率为 94%,粘性诱捕器为 99%。诱捕器的数量确实会影响捕获成功率,并且诱捕器的高度和与受感染铁杉的距离会影响每个诱捕器捕获的象鼻虫数量。随着基于 eDNA 的监测方法继续被纳入入侵物种调查,进一步改进这些类型的诱捕器可以作为管理人员工具包中的附加工具。