Quinlivan Alannah, Lester Susan, Barrett Claire, Whittle Samuel, Rowett Debra, Black Rachel, Chand Vibhasha, Marine Franca, March Lyn, Sinnathurai Premarani, Buchbinder Rachelle, Hill Catherine
Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2022 Nov 10;6(3):rkac099. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkac099. eCollection 2022.
To investigate the knowledge and beliefs of Australian patients with inflammatory arthritis regarding biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) and biosimilars and their sources of information.
Participants enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD) with RA, PsA and axial SpA were sent an online survey. They were asked about information sources for b/tsDMARDs and how positive or negative this information was. The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) was used to measure beliefs about b/tsDMARDs with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Participants were asked about their knowledge of biosimilars and willingness to switch to biosimilar.
There was a response rate of 66% (994/1498; 67% female, median age 62 years). Participants currently taking b/tsDMARDs ( = 794) had a high b/tsDMARD-specific BMQ 'necessity' score {median 4.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 3.6-4.8]}, with a lower specific 'concerns' score [median 2.4 (IQR 2.0- 3.0)]. Participants consulted multiple information sources [median 3 (IQR 2-5)]. Positive sources were rheumatologists and educational websites and negative were chat rooms and social media. Only 18% were familiar with biosimilars, with half knowing of availability in Australia. Following a short paragraph describing biosimilars, 75% (744) of participants indicated they would consider switching if recommended by their rheumatologist, with nearly half identifying safety and efficacy of biosimilars as an important concern.
Australian patients have positive attitudes towards b/tsDMARDs overall, although little knowledge of biosimilars specifically. They have a high degree of trust in their rheumatologist regarding treatment decisions, even if they are unfamiliar with the medication recommended.
调查澳大利亚炎性关节炎患者对生物制剂/靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药(b/tsDMARDs)和生物类似药的了解及看法,以及他们的信息来源。
向澳大利亚风湿病协会数据库(ARAD)中登记的类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和中轴型脊柱关节炎(axial SpA)患者发送在线调查问卷。询问他们关于b/tsDMARDs的信息来源以及这些信息的积极或消极程度。使用医学信念问卷(BMQ)来衡量对b/tsDMARDs的看法,分数范围为1(强烈不同意)至5(强烈同意)。询问参与者对生物类似药的了解以及改用生物类似药的意愿。
回复率为66%(994/1498;女性占67%,中位年龄62岁)。目前正在服用b/tsDMARDs的参与者(n = 794)的b/tsDMARDs特异性BMQ“必要性”得分较高{中位数为4.2[四分位间距(IQR)3.6 - 4.8]},而特异性“担忧”得分较低[中位数为2.4(IQR 2.0 - 3.0)]。参与者咨询了多个信息来源[中位数为3(IQR 2 - 5)]。积极的信息来源是风湿病专家和教育网站,消极的是聊天室和社交媒体。只有18%的人熟悉生物类似药,其中一半知道在澳大利亚有此类药物。在阅读了一段关于生物类似药的描述后,75%(744)的参与者表示,如果风湿病专家推荐,他们会考虑改用生物类似药,近一半的人认为生物类似药的安全性和有效性是一个重要问题。
澳大利亚患者总体上对b/tsDMARDs持积极态度,尽管对生物类似药的了解较少。他们在治疗决策方面高度信任自己的风湿病专家,即使他们对推荐的药物不熟悉。