Centre for Research on Health and Social Care, Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Italy.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Contemporary commentators describe the current period as "an era of fake news" in which misinformation, generated intentionally or unintentionally, spreads rapidly. Although affecting all areas of life, it poses particular problems in the health arena, where it can delay or prevent effective care, in some cases threatening the lives of individuals. While examples of the rapid spread of misinformation date back to the earliest days of scientific medicine, the internet, by allowing instantaneous communication and powerful amplification has brought about a quantum change. In democracies where ideas compete in the marketplace for attention, accurate scientific information, which may be difficult to comprehend and even dull, is easily crowded out by sensationalized news. In order to uncover the current evidence and better understand the mechanism of misinformation spread, we report a systematic review of the nature and potential drivers of health-related misinformation. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus and Google databases to identify relevant methodological and empirical articles published between 2012 and 2018. A total of 57 articles were included for full-text analysis. Overall, we observe an increasing trend in published articles on health-related misinformation and the role of social media in its propagation. The most extensively studied topics involving misinformation relate to vaccination, Ebola and Zika Virus, although others, such as nutrition, cancer, fluoridation of water and smoking also featured. Studies adopted theoretical frameworks from psychology and network science, while co-citation analysis revealed potential for greater collaboration across fields. Most studies employed content analysis, social network analysis or experiments, drawing on disparate disciplinary paradigms. Future research should examine susceptibility of different sociodemographic groups to misinformation and understand the role of belief systems on the intention to spread misinformation. Further interdisciplinary research is also warranted to identify effective and tailored interventions to counter the spread of health-related misinformation online.
当代评论员将当前时期描述为“假新闻”时代,在这个时代,无论是有意还是无意制造的错误信息都迅速传播。尽管它影响了生活的各个领域,但在健康领域尤其成问题,因为它可能会延误或阻止有效的治疗,在某些情况下甚至会威胁到个人的生命。虽然错误信息迅速传播的例子可以追溯到科学医学的早期,但互联网通过允许即时通信和强大的放大,带来了巨大的变化。在民主国家,思想在竞争中争取关注,准确的科学信息,尽管可能难以理解甚至枯燥乏味,但很容易被耸人听闻的新闻所掩盖。为了揭示当前的证据并更好地理解错误信息传播的机制,我们报告了一项关于与健康相关的错误信息的性质和潜在驱动因素的系统综述。我们在 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google 数据库中搜索了 2012 年至 2018 年间发表的相关方法学和实证文章。共有 57 篇文章被纳入全文分析。总体而言,我们观察到关于与健康相关的错误信息和社交媒体在其传播中的作用的发表文章呈上升趋势。研究最多的涉及错误信息的主题与疫苗接种、埃博拉病毒和寨卡病毒有关,尽管也有其他主题,如营养、癌症、水氟化和吸烟。研究采用了来自心理学和网络科学的理论框架,而共引分析则显示了跨领域合作的潜力。大多数研究采用了内容分析、社会网络分析或实验,借鉴了不同的学科范式。未来的研究应该研究不同社会人口群体对错误信息的易感性,并理解信仰体系在传播错误信息意图方面的作用。还需要进一步的跨学科研究,以确定有效的、量身定制的干预措施,以对抗在线传播与健康相关的错误信息。