Musculoskeletal Health and Implementation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 25;12(11):e060169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060169.
The main objective was to investigate 5-year outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomised to one of two non-surgical treatments.
Two outpatient clinics.
At baseline, 100 patients with radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis not found eligible for knee replacement (KR) were included. Main exclusion criteria were average score above 75 of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales pain, symptoms, function of daily living and quality of life; KOOS and average knee pain the previous week greater than 60 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale.
Patients were randomised to supervised non-surgical treatment consisting of patient education, supervised exercise, weight loss, insoles, and pain medication (the MEDIC treatment) or written advice. The 12-week MEDIC treatment included patient education, neuromuscular exercise, insoles and a dietary weight loss programme and/or pain medication if needed and written advice consisted of two leaflets.
Primary outcome was 5-year mean change for KOOS. Secondary outcomes included KOOS subscales, self-reported health, usage of pain medication and self-reported physical activity.
Thirty-nine (78%) and 36 (72%) from the MEDIC and written advice groups responded at 5 years. There were no between-group differences in KOOS (difference 5.3 (95% CI -1.5 to 12.1) or any secondary outcomes. However, the 95% CI included the minimal clinically important difference for the main outcome.Seventy-six percent of the MEDIC group and 66% of the written advice group experienced clinically important improvements in KOOS.Fifteen patients (30%) from the MEDIC group and 17 (34%) from the written advice group received KR in the index knee. Undergoing KR did not result in a statistically significant greater improvement in KOOS (difference 6.1 (95% CI -1.1 to 13.4).
No statistically significant differences between supervised non-surgical treatment and written advice were demonstrated at 5 years. Most patients experienced clinically important improvements, irrespective of initial treatment strategy or KR.
NCT01535001; ClinicalTrials.gov.
本研究主要目的是评估膝关节骨关节炎患者在接受两种非手术治疗后 5 年的结局。
两家门诊诊所。
本研究纳入了 100 名影像学和症状符合膝关节骨关节炎且不符合膝关节置换(KR)标准的患者。主要排除标准为膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)子量表疼痛、症状、日常生活功能和生活质量平均评分>75 分;KOOS 和前一周平均膝关节疼痛评分>60mm(100mm 视觉模拟评分)。
患者被随机分配接受监督下的非手术治疗,包括患者教育、监督运动、减肥、鞋垫和止痛药物(MEDIC 治疗)或书面建议。12 周 MEDIC 治疗包括患者教育、神经肌肉运动、鞋垫和饮食减肥计划和/或必要时的止痛药物,以及两份传单。
主要结局为 KOOS 的 5 年平均变化。次要结局包括 KOOS 子量表、自我报告的健康状况、止痛药物的使用情况和自我报告的身体活动情况。
MEDIC 组和书面建议组分别有 39 名(78%)和 36 名(72%)患者在 5 年时做出回应。两组在 KOOS 方面没有差异(差异 5.3[95%CI-1.5 至 12.1]或任何次要结局)。然而,主要结局的 95%CI 包括最小临床重要差异。MEDIC 组 76%和书面建议组 66%的患者在 KOOS 方面有临床意义的改善。MEDIC 组中有 15 名患者(30%)和书面建议组中有 17 名患者(34%)在索引膝关节接受了 KR。接受 KR 并没有导致 KOOS 的统计学显著改善(差异 6.1[95%CI-1.1 至 13.4])。
在 5 年时,监督下的非手术治疗与书面建议之间没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。大多数患者都有临床意义上的改善,无论初始治疗策略或 KR 如何。
NCT01535001;ClinicalTrials.gov。