• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和公众对减肥手术的看法:系统评价。

Patient and the Public's Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.

Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:385-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.061. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.061
PMID:36434835
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery is an effective therapeutic modality for obesity and related comorbidities, yet it remains significantly underutilized. Patient perceptions and expectations may influence the decisions of eligible patients in pursuing surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, SCOPUS, and OVID databases were searched in July 2022 to identify published studies discussing patient and the public's perceptions of bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

The literature shows participants often reported bariatric surgery to be a life-changing intervention known to induce weight loss, improve obesity-related comorbidities, and improve quality of life. However, a significant proportion of survey respondents perceived bariatric surgery as unsafe or risky. Patients belonging to racial minority groups cited higher concern with mortality risk, lower weight loss expectations, and different motivations to pursue bariatric surgery. Female patients were significantly more likely to have more positive perceptions of, and higher expectations of weight loss from, bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature highlighted discordance between patient perceptions and the demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy profile of bariatric surgery. Overestimations of the risks, unrealistic expectations, and unfamiliarity with bariatric surgery outcomes were common findings. These perceptions of bariatric surgery may contribute to its underutilization among eligible patients. Perceptions and motivations often varied by race, region, sex, and age, which demonstrates the necessity of patient-centered education in the prereferral stage. The literature also demonstrated misconceptions of bariatric surgery among the public. Further research should explore the impact of education on the perceptions of patients and the public.

摘要

简介

减重手术是治疗肥胖症及相关合并症的有效治疗方法,但它的应用仍然明显不足。患者的看法和期望可能会影响有资格接受手术的患者的决策。

方法

2022 年 7 月,我们在 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 OVID 数据库中进行了检索,以确定讨论患者和公众对减重手术看法的已发表研究。

结果

文献表明,参与者通常报告减重手术是一种改变生活的干预措施,已知可诱导体重减轻、改善肥胖相关合并症并提高生活质量。然而,相当一部分调查受访者认为减重手术不安全或有风险。属于少数族裔的患者更担心死亡率风险、较低的减肥预期以及不同的减肥动机。女性患者对减重手术的看法明显更为积极,对减重手术的期望也更高。

结论

文献强调了患者对减重手术的看法与临床安全性和疗效之间的不一致。对风险的高估、不切实际的期望以及对减重手术结果的不熟悉是常见的发现。这些对减重手术的看法可能导致其在有资格的患者中应用不足。看法和动机往往因种族、地区、性别和年龄而异,这表明在预转诊阶段需要以患者为中心的教育。文献还表明公众对减重手术存在误解。进一步的研究应该探索教育对患者和公众看法的影响。

相似文献

1
Patient and the Public's Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.患者和公众对减肥手术的看法:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:385-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.061. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
4
Sex difference in the safety and efficacy of bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减重手术安全性和疗效的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Jul;18(7):983-996. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.022. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Gap: Addressing Barriers in Bariatric Surgery Training in Pakistan.弥合差距:解决巴基斯坦减重手术培训中的障碍
Cureus. 2025 Jul 9;17(7):e87613. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87613. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Weight Stigma in the Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Context: Current State of the Literature, Conceptual Model, and Looking Forward.代谢减重手术背景下的体重歧视:文献现状、概念模型及展望
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Jul 16;14(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00651-x.
3
Exploring the Role of Internalized Weight Bias as a Metric of Cumulative Social Disadvantage Among People With Obesity or Overweight: Insights From the OBSERVE Study.
探索内化体重偏见作为肥胖或超重人群累积社会劣势指标的作用:来自OBSERVE研究的见解。
Obes Sci Pract. 2025 Jun 30;11(4):e70082. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70082. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Characterizing obesity: A qualitative study.肥胖的特征描述:一项定性研究。
Obes Pillars. 2025 Apr 2;14:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Bridging the gap between bariatric surgery and continuous multidisciplinary care.弥合减肥手术与持续多学科护理之间的差距。
Malays Fam Physician. 2024 Feb 7;19:8. doi: 10.51866/lte.514. eCollection 2024.
6
Large language models and bariatric surgery patient education: a comparative readability analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and online institutional resources.大型语言模型和减重手术患者教育:GPT-3.5、GPT-4、Bard 与在线机构资源的可读性比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2522-2532. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10720-2. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Bariatric Evaluation Through AI: a Survey of Expert Opinions Versus ChatGPT-4 (BETA-SEOV).通过人工智能进行肥胖评估:专家意见与 ChatGPT-4 (BETA-SEOV) 的对比调查。
Obes Surg. 2023 Dec;33(12):3971-3980. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06903-w. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
8
Providers' Knowledge and Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review.医务人员对减重手术的认知和看法:一项系统性综述。
Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3571-3601. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06827-5. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
9
Long-term effectiveness, outcomes and complications of bariatric surgery.减肥手术的长期疗效、结果及并发症
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jul 6;11(19):4504-4512. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4504.
10
A Paradigm Shift: Online Artificial Intelligence Platforms as an Informational Resource in Bariatric Surgery.一种范式转变:在线人工智能平台作为减肥手术中的信息资源
Obes Surg. 2023 Aug;33(8):2611-2614. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06675-3. Epub 2023 Jun 16.