Health Intelligence, Western Cape Government: Health, Cape Town, South Africa; Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Health Intelligence, Western Cape Government: Health, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Feb;127:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.024. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
We aimed to compare the clinical severity of Omicron BA.4/BA.5 infection with BA.1 and earlier variant infections among laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases in the Western Cape, South Africa, using timing of infection to infer the lineage/variant causing infection.
We included public sector patients aged ≥20 years with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between May 01-May 21, 2022 (BA.4/BA.5 wave) and equivalent previous wave periods. We compared the risk between waves of (i) death and (ii) severe hospitalization/death (all within 21 days of diagnosis) using Cox regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, admission pressure, vaccination, and previous infection.
Among 3793 patients from the BA.4/BA.5 wave and 190,836 patients from previous waves, the risk of severe hospitalization/death was similar in the BA.4/BA.5 and BA.1 waves (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93; 1.34). Both Omicron waves had a lower risk of severe outcomes than previous waves. Previous infection (aHR 0.29, 95% CI 0.24; 0.36) and vaccination (aHR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07; 0.40 for at least three doses vs no vaccine) were protective.
Disease severity was similar among diagnosed COVID-19 cases in the BA.4/BA.5 and BA.1 periods in the context of growing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 due to previous infection and vaccination, both of which were strongly protective.
我们旨在通过感染时间推断导致感染的谱系/变异体,比较南非西开普省实验室确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 病例中,Omicron BA.4/BA.5 感染与 BA.1 和早期变异感染的临床严重程度。
我们纳入了 2022 年 5 月 1 日至 5 月 21 日(BA.4/BA.5 波)和同期之前波期间在公共部门就诊的年龄≥20 岁、实验室确诊的 COVID-19 患者。我们使用 Cox 回归比较了波之间(i)死亡和(ii)严重住院/死亡(均在诊断后 21 天内)的风险,调整了人口统计学、合并症、入院压力、疫苗接种和既往感染。
在 3793 名 BA.4/BA.5 波患者和 190836 名之前波患者中,BA.4/BA.5 波和 BA.1 波的严重住院/死亡风险相似(调整后的危险比 [aHR] 1.12;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.93;1.34)。Omicron 两个波的严重后果风险均低于之前的波。既往感染(aHR 0.29,95%CI 0.24;0.36)和疫苗接种(至少接种三剂疫苗的 aHR 0.17;95%CI 0.07;0.40 与无疫苗接种相比)具有保护作用。
在既往感染和疫苗接种导致 SARS-CoV-2 免疫力增强的背景下,BA.4/BA.5 和 BA.1 期诊断的 COVID-19 病例的疾病严重程度相似,两者均具有很强的保护作用。