Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Associated Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Oct;132(4):829-837. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
Scan path length and the presence of edentulous alveolar ridge sections have a negative influence on scanning accuracy. How different artificial landmarks combined with an adapted scanning method affect accuracy is unclear.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of 2 different artificial landmarks combined with an adapted scanning method on the scanning accuracy of a partially edentulous maxillary model.
The model simulated a maxilla with 6 prepared teeth to accommodate a complete arch fixed partial denture. Five ceramic precision balls (ball center P-P), distributed buccally to the dental arch, were used to detect the dimensional and angular changes between the reference model and the intraoral scans. One intraoral scanner (Primescan) was used to make 30 scans each with either the scanning strategy recommended by the manufacturer (M) or with an adapted scanning strategy and the use of a bar (B) or 4 plates (P) as artificial landmarks in the dorsal palate. Data were statistically analyzed using a generalized least squares regression model (α=.05).
Scanning with artificial landmarks reduced the maximum absolute distance deviations (M: 249 μm, B: 190 μm, P: 238 μm) and the maximum angle deviations (M: 0.31 degrees, B: 0.28 degrees, P: 0.26 degrees). Vertical distance deviations were improved by 10 to 50% with the use of artificial landmarks. Absolute mean distance deviations were significantly lower for group M (P<.001). In contrast, with artificial landmarks, mean angle (P<.001) and mean vertical distance deviations (P<.014) improved significantly.
Scanning with artificial landmarks in the dorsal palate combined with an adapted scanning method improved the scanning accuracy and reliability of vertical distance deviations.
扫描路径长度和无牙牙槽嵴部分的存在对扫描精度有负面影响。不同的人工标志与适应的扫描方法相结合如何影响准确性尚不清楚。
本体外研究的目的是确定 2 种不同的人工标志与适应的扫描方法相结合对部分缺牙上颌模型的扫描精度的影响。
该模型模拟了一个上颌,有 6 个预备牙以容纳全弓固定局部义齿。5 个陶瓷精密球(球心 P-P)分布在牙弓颊侧,用于检测参考模型和口腔内扫描之间的尺寸和角度变化。使用 1 台口腔内扫描仪(Primescan),分别采用制造商推荐的扫描策略(M)或适应的扫描策略和使用杆(B)或 4 个板(P)作为硬腭中的人工标志进行 30 次扫描。使用广义最小二乘回归模型(α=.05)对数据进行统计分析。
使用人工标志进行扫描减少了最大绝对距离偏差(M:249μm,B:190μm,P:238μm)和最大角度偏差(M:0.31 度,B:0.28 度,P:0.26 度)。使用人工标志可将垂直距离偏差提高 10%至 50%。M 组的绝对平均距离偏差显著降低(P<.001)。相比之下,使用人工标志可显著改善平均角度(P<.001)和平均垂直距离偏差(P<.014)。
硬腭中的人工标志与适应的扫描方法相结合进行扫描可提高垂直距离偏差的扫描精度和可靠性。