Figueiredo Patricia, Ramião Eduarda, Barroso Ricardo, Barbosa Fernando
Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto.
Department of Education and Psychology, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro.
Neuropsychology. 2023 Feb;37(2):133-156. doi: 10.1037/neu0000881. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
Precursors of antisocial behavior in children may be associated with neuropsychological deficits, namely in executive functions (EF). The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence of the relation between EF performance and early manifestations of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents.
The procedures of this systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the PRISMA recommendations. The review was based on a systematic search in the EBSCOhost and Pubmed databases. Fifty studies were included in this review, 37 of which contributed with data for meta-analysis. All studies examined the possible relation between the EF measures and behavior problems in childhood and adolescence. Meta-analytical procedures were performed, and the overall effect size was calculated from random-effect models, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
A substantial part of the studies report EF deficits in children and adolescents who present behavior problems, revealing that these deficits are already present in youth, long before being associated with antisocial behavior in adults, especially when in comorbidity with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Specifically, typical controls (TC) performed significantly better than disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) groups on measures of = -.35, 95% CI [-0.48, -0.22], < .001. Similar results were found for = -.26, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.07], < .001, = -.30, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.04], = .03, = -.45, 95% CI [-0.71, -0.19], = .001, and = -.31, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.02], = .04. Comparing DBD + ADHD participants with TC, no significant differences were found, either for or for each dimension. Finally, DBD participants performed better than DBD + ADHD participants on measures of = .20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33], = .002.
These findings are in line with neuropsychological theories arguing that executive dysfunctions may interfere with the children's and/or adolescents' ability to control their own conduct, in order to inhibit inappropriate behaviors in favor of the prosocial ones. This review and meta-analysis also identify the main characteristics and potential limitations of the existing studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
儿童反社会行为的先兆可能与神经心理缺陷有关,尤其是执行功能(EF)方面的缺陷。本系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是综合有关EF表现与儿童和青少年反社会行为早期表现之间关系的证据。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的程序基于PRISMA建议。该评价基于对EBSCOhost和Pubmed数据库的系统检索。本评价纳入了50项研究,其中37项为荟萃分析提供了数据。所有研究均考察了EF测量与儿童和青少年行为问题之间的可能关系。进行了荟萃分析程序,并使用综合荟萃分析软件从随机效应模型计算总体效应大小。
相当一部分研究报告了存在行为问题的儿童和青少年存在EF缺陷,表明这些缺陷在青少年时期就已存在,远早于与成人反社会行为相关联的时候,尤其是当与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)共病时。具体而言,在测量指标上,典型对照组(TC)的表现显著优于破坏性行为障碍(DBD)组,效应量g = -0.35,95%置信区间[-0.48, -0.22],p <.001。在其他测量指标上也发现了类似结果,如g = -0.26,95%置信区间[-0.45, -0.07],p <.001;g = -0.30,95%置信区间[-0.57, -0.04],p =.03;g = -0.45,95%置信区间[-0.71, -0.19],p =.001;g = -0.31,95%置信区间[-0.60, -0.02],p =.04。将DBD + ADHD参与者与TC进行比较,无论是在总体效应量还是在各个维度上均未发现显著差异。最后,在测量指标上,DBD参与者的表现优于DBD + ADHD参与者,效应量g = 0.20,95%置信区间[0.08, 0.33],p =.002。
这些发现与神经心理学理论一致,该理论认为执行功能障碍可能会干扰儿童和/或青少年控制自己行为的能力,从而抑制不适当行为以支持亲社会行为。本综述和荟萃分析还确定了现有研究的主要特征和潜在局限性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)