• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体干预对癌症患者教育和交流的影响:系统评价方案

Effect of social media interventions on the education and communication among patients with cancer: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 30;12(11):e066550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066550.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066550
PMID:36450436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9716998/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. In addition, it accounted for approximately 10 million deaths in 2020 alone. Information and communication technologies have great potential for improving health education and communication. Social media is one of the technologies that can help patients with cancer and healthcare providers communicate and provide educational information. Social media are increasingly being used for health promotion and behaviour change. This is a protocol of systematic review to identify the effect of social media interventions on the education and communication among patients affected by cancer. This study aims to reveal the steps of conducting research that systematically reviews all studies for the specific objective. This study aims to examine the social media interventions to improve awareness and knowledge about the disease for patients with cancer and improve communication among them.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols checklist. We will include experimental design studies that report the effect of social media interventions on education and communication among patients with cancer or malignancy and any stage of the disease. Interventions will be inclusive, using all social network platforms for patients' communication and education. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library from inception until 23 May 2022. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles with conflicts resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer, as needed. All titles, abstracts and full-text papers will be reviewed independently by two reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies will resolve by discussion or SRNK if needed. The two reviewers will also independently complete risk of bias assessments for each included study. The descriptive analysis, including frequency and percentage parameters, will be calculated based on the study's variables. Furthermore, we will report the results of the quality assessment of studies in table format. In the result section, a narrative synthesis will be applied to describe and compare the paper's results.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval will not be needed because the data to be used in this systematic review and meta-analysis will be extracted from published studies. It will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022334691.

摘要

简介

癌症是全球主要的死亡原因。此外,仅 2020 年一年,癌症就导致了约 1000 万人死亡。信息和通信技术在改善健康教育和沟通方面具有巨大潜力。社交媒体是可以帮助癌症患者和医疗保健提供者进行沟通和提供教育信息的技术之一。社交媒体越来越多地被用于促进健康和改变行为。这是一项系统评价方案,旨在确定社交媒体干预措施对癌症患者教育和沟通的影响。本研究旨在揭示系统评价研究的步骤,以针对特定目标对所有研究进行研究。本研究旨在研究社交媒体干预措施,以提高癌症患者对疾病的认识和知识水平,并改善他们之间的沟通。

方法和分析

本方案按照系统评价和荟萃分析方案报告的首选项目清单进行报告。我们将包括实验设计研究,报告社交媒体干预措施对癌症或恶性肿瘤患者教育和沟通的影响,以及疾病的任何阶段。干预措施将是包容性的,使用所有社交网络平台进行患者沟通和教育。我们将从成立到 2022 年 5 月 23 日在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行搜索。两名独立评审员将根据纳入和排除标准筛选标题、摘要和全文文章,如有冲突则通过讨论或需要时由第三名评审员解决。两名评审员将根据纳入和排除标准独立审查所有标题、摘要和全文文章。如有分歧,将通过讨论或需要时由 SRNK 解决。两名评审员还将独立完成对每项纳入研究的偏倚风险评估。基于研究变量,将计算描述性分析,包括频率和百分比参数。此外,我们将以表格形式报告研究质量评估的结果。在结果部分,将应用叙述性综合描述和比较论文的结果。

伦理和传播

由于本系统评价和荟萃分析中使用的数据将从已发表的研究中提取,因此不需要伦理批准。它将通过在同行评审的期刊上发表来传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022334691。

相似文献

1
Effect of social media interventions on the education and communication among patients with cancer: a systematic review protocol.社交媒体干预对癌症患者教育和交流的影响:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 30;12(11):e066550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066550.
2
Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.社交媒体和移动医疗技术在癌症筛查中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e035411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The impact of social media interventions on eating behaviours and diet in adolescents and young adults: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.社交媒体干预对青少年和年轻成年人饮食行为和饮食的影响:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e083465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083465.
5
Protocol for a systematic review of reviews on training primary care providers in dermoscopy to detect skin cancers.系统评价综述培训初级保健提供者进行皮肤镜检查以发现皮肤癌的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 11;13(12):e079052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079052.
6
Prevalence of neck pain and its associated factors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非洲颈痛的患病率及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 18;13(9):e074219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074219.
7
Cardiac adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis: A protocol for systematic review.PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂在癌症治疗方案中的心脏不良事件:一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案:系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(5):e18701. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018701.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Scoping review protocol to map the use of text-based two-way communication between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation.范围综述方案,用于绘制患者和医疗保健专业人员在出院后的基于文本的双向沟通使用情况,并确定实施的促进因素和障碍。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e062087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062087.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Prevention and Treatment on Chinese Social Media: Machine Learning-Based Content Analysis Study.中文社交媒体中的癌症预防与治疗:基于机器学习的内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55937. doi: 10.2196/55937.

本文引用的文献

1
Interactions of multidomain pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins in cancer cell death.多结构域促凋亡蛋白与抗凋亡蛋白在癌细胞死亡中的相互作用。
Oncotarget. 2021 Aug 3;12(16):1615-1626. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28031.
2
Effect of Cancer on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of Patient Data.癌症对COVID-19患者临床结局的影响:患者数据的荟萃分析
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:799-808. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00225.
3
Digital interventions to facilitate patient-provider communication in cancer care: A systematic review.数字干预措施促进癌症护理中的医患沟通:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2020 Apr;29(4):591-603. doi: 10.1002/pon.5310. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
4
Impact of health education intervention on knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and screening for women in Ghana.加纳女性对宫颈癌相关知识和筛查的认知及影响因素:健康教育干预效果评估
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):1505. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7867-x.
5
Perceived Patient-Provider Communication Quality and Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Watching Health-Related Videos on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.与在YouTube上观看健康相关视频相关的患者-提供者沟通质量感知及社会人口学因素:一项横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 17;21(5):e13512. doi: 10.2196/13512.
6
Use of Social Media in Health Communication: Findings From the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013, 2014, and 2017.社交媒体在健康传播中的应用:来自2013年、2014年和2017年健康信息国家趋势调查的结果
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819841442. doi: 10.1177/1073274819841442.
7
Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.通过信件、电话或亲自沟通癌症筛查结果:对参与者焦虑、理解和偏好影响的混合方法系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 29;13:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.016. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Offspring Caregivers of Chinese Women with Breast Cancer: Their Social Support Requests and Provision on Social Media.中国乳腺癌女性的后代照顾者:她们在社交媒体上的社会支持请求与提供情况
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Aug;25(8):748-755. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0176. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Social Media as a Tool to Promote Health Awareness: Results from an Online Cervical Cancer Prevention Study.社交媒体作为提高健康意识的工具:一项在线宫颈癌预防研究的结果
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):819-822. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1379-8.
10
Educational Interventions for Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior of Women: A Systematic Review.针对女性宫颈癌筛查行为的教育干预措施:一项系统综述
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Apr 25;19(4):875-884. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.4.875.