Hume Anne L, Osundolire Seun, Mbrah Attah K, Nunes Anthony P, Lapane Kate L
College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
J Nurs Home Res Sci. 2022;8:10-19. Epub 2022 May 12.
About 29.2% of American adults ≥ 65 years of age have diabetes mellitus, but details regarding diabetes management especially among nursing home residents are dated.
Evaluate the prevalence of antihyperglycemic agents in residents with diabetes mellitus and describe resident characteristics using major drug classes.
cross-sectional study.
virtually all United States nursing homes.
141,636 residents with diabetes mellitus.
Minimum Data Set (2016) and Medicare Part D claims determined use of metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinide analogs, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, TZDs, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP1 agonists, as monotherapy and with basal insulin.
Seventy-two percent received antihyperglycemic drugs [most common: basal insulins (53.9% total; 46.9% with other non-insulin agents), metformin (35.5% total; 14.2% monotherapy), sulfonylureas (19.6% total; 6.3% monotherapy), and DPP4 inhibitors (12.2% total; 2.2% monotherapy)]. Sixty-three percent of meglitinide monotherapy versus 34.1% of metformin monotherapy users; and 38.3% meglitinide-basal insulin versus 22.2% metformin-basal insulin users were ≥85 years. Obesity was greater among users of GLP1 agonists compared to those receiving other agents (monotherapy: 60.5% versus 33-42%; with basal insulin: 76.2% versus 50-58%). End-stage renal disease was least prevalent among metformin users (monotherapy: 6.6%; with basal insulin: 8.8%) and most common among meglitinide monotherapy (19.6%) and GLP1 agonists with basal insulin (22%) users.
There is heterogeneity of diabetes treatment in nursing homes. Use of antihyperglycemic drugs with a higher risk of hypoglycemia, such as insulin with sulfonylureas or meglitinides, continue in nursing home residents.
约29.2%的65岁及以上美国成年人患有糖尿病,但关于糖尿病管理的详细情况,尤其是疗养院居民中的情况已过时。
评估糖尿病居民中降糖药物的使用情况,并按主要药物类别描述居民特征。
横断面研究。
几乎所有美国疗养院。
141,636名糖尿病居民。
最小数据集(2016年)和医疗保险D部分索赔确定了二甲双胍、磺脲类、格列奈类、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、噻唑烷二酮类、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂作为单一疗法以及与基础胰岛素联合使用的情况。
72%的患者接受了降糖药物治疗[最常见的是:基础胰岛素(占总数的53.9%;与其他非胰岛素药物联合使用时占46.9%)、二甲双胍(占总数的35.5%;单一疗法占14.2%)、磺脲类(占总数的19.6%;单一疗法占6.3%)和二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(占总数的12.2%;单一疗法占2.2%)]。格列奈类单一疗法使用者中有63%,而二甲双胍单一疗法使用者中有34.1%;格列奈类与基础胰岛素联合使用者中有38.3%,而二甲双胍与基础胰岛素联合使用者中有22.2%的患者年龄≥85岁。与接受其他药物治疗的患者相比,胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂使用者中的肥胖情况更为严重(单一疗法:60.5%对33%-42%;与基础胰岛素联合使用:76.2%对50%-58%)。终末期肾病在二甲双胍使用者中最为少见(单一疗法:6.6%;与基础胰岛素联合使用:8.8%),而在格列奈类单一疗法使用者(19.6%)和胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂与基础胰岛素联合使用者(22%)中最为常见。
疗养院中的糖尿病治疗存在异质性。低血糖风险较高的降糖药物,如胰岛素与磺脲类或格列奈类联合使用,在疗养院居民中仍在继续使用。