• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

65 岁以上股骨转子间骨折患者的骨形态对骨折类型和治疗结果的影响。

The Effect of Bone Morphology on Fracture Type and Treatment Result in Patients with Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Aged over 65 year.

机构信息

Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty Of Medicine Department Of Orthopaedics And Traumatology.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Dec;28(12):1731-1738. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
PMID:36453791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patient with inter-trochanteric fracture (IFF) treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) aged over 65 years. Primary outcome of study was to investigate the relationship between fracture type (stable or unstable) and bone density.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at single trauma center which included patients aged >65 years, minimum 3 months' control postoperatively, patients with simple fall by evaluating the patient data from 2010 to 2021. All fractures were classified based on the AO classification system. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation was used between 2010 and 2016, while InterTAN was used after 2016 in our clinic practice. For the evaluation of the bone morphology, we measured the canal-to-calcar ratio (CCR) and cortical thickness index (CTI) and classified with Dorr morphology on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiograph of both the fracture side and contralateral sides. Complications were also evaluated on radiological view. Failures were defined as non-union or failure of fixation. Excessive collapse and screw/blade prominence also evaluated by hip radiograph on the 3rd month control visit.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty females and 59 males were included in this study. The average age was 81.6±8.8 years. One hundred and forty-four patients were treated with InterTAN and 65 patients with helical blade type IMN (PFN-A®). There were 78 patients with stable IFF type A1 fracture and 131 patients with unstable IFF (109 patients with A2 and 22 patients with A3 AO type fracture). The mean CTI was 0.469±0.09 and 0.510±0.09 in the fracture and unaffected side femurs, respectively (p<0.001), the CCR was 0.636±0.15 and 0.568±12 in the fracture and unaffected side femurs, respectively (p<0.001). There were 36 patients with Dorr type A, 115 patients with Dorr type B, and 48 patients with Dorr type C in fracture side and 65 patients with Dorr type A, 123 patients with Dorr type B, and 21 patients with Dorr type C in non-affected side (p<0.001). There were 29 (13.9%) patients with screw (n=14) and blade (n=15) prominence. Excessive collapse was seen 30 patients (14.4%) and 16 patients (7.7) evaluated as a failure.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant difference in the failure rate between unstable group than stable group which higher in unstable group according to the AO classification. In addition, the mean CTI, CCR, and Dorr index were significant difference in fractured side than unaffected side which indicated lower bone quality at fracture side.

摘要

背景

我们旨在研究骨形态对 65 岁以上股骨转子间骨折(IFF)患者接受髓内钉(IMN)治疗的骨折类型和治疗结果的影响。研究的主要结果是研究骨折类型(稳定型或不稳定型)与骨密度之间的关系。

方法

这是一项在单一创伤中心进行的回顾性队列研究,纳入了年龄>65 岁、术后至少 3 个月随访、通过评估患者数据(2010 年至 2021 年)单纯跌倒的患者。所有骨折均根据 AO 分类系统进行分类。2010 年至 2016 年期间使用近端股骨钉抗旋,2016 年后在我们的临床实践中使用 InterTAN。为了评估骨形态,我们测量了管腔至小粗隆比(CCR)和皮质厚度指数(CTI),并在骨折侧和对侧的前后位(AP)髋关节 X 线片上根据 Dorr 形态进行分类。还通过影像学视图评估并发症。失败被定义为非愈合或固定失败。在第 3 个月的随访中,还通过髋关节 X 线片评估过度塌陷和螺钉/刀片突出。

结果

本研究纳入了 150 名女性和 59 名男性。平均年龄为 81.6±8.8 岁。144 名患者接受 InterTAN 治疗,65 名患者接受螺旋刀片型 IMN(PFN-A®)治疗。78 例患者为稳定型 A1 型 IFF,131 例为不稳定型 IFF(109 例为 A2 型,22 例为 A3 AO 型骨折)。骨折侧 CTI 平均值为 0.469±0.09,未受影响侧股骨 CTI 平均值为 0.510±0.09(p<0.001),骨折侧 CCR 平均值为 0.636±0.15,未受影响侧股骨 CCR 平均值为 0.568±0.15(p<0.001)。骨折侧有 36 例 Dorr 型 A,115 例 Dorr 型 B,48 例 Dorr 型 C,未受影响侧有 65 例 Dorr 型 A,123 例 Dorr 型 B,21 例 Dorr 型 C(p<0.001)。有 29 例(13.9%)患者存在螺钉(n=14)和刀片(n=15)突出。30 例(14.4%)出现过度塌陷,16 例(7.7%)评估为失败。

结论

我们发现根据 AO 分类,不稳定型组的失败率明显高于稳定型组,不稳定型组的失败率更高。此外,骨折侧的平均 CTI、CCR 和 Dorr 指数与未受影响侧相比有显著差异,这表明骨折侧的骨质量较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/f2380ac9dff2/TJTES-28-1731-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/de5e49280a0d/TJTES-28-1731-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/9bf860289f26/TJTES-28-1731-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/d839368c2746/TJTES-28-1731-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/f2380ac9dff2/TJTES-28-1731-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/de5e49280a0d/TJTES-28-1731-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/9bf860289f26/TJTES-28-1731-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/d839368c2746/TJTES-28-1731-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/10198310/f2380ac9dff2/TJTES-28-1731-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Bone Morphology on Fracture Type and Treatment Result in Patients with Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Aged over 65 year.65 岁以上股骨转子间骨折患者的骨形态对骨折类型和治疗结果的影响。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Dec;28(12):1731-1738. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400.
2
[Reasons of the guide pin eccentricity of helical blade during proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures].[股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折时螺旋刀片导针偏心的原因]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 15;35(8):950-955. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101054.
3
[Effectiveness of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus Intertan intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with incomplete lateral wall].股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合微创经皮钢板接骨术与Intertan髓内钉固定治疗外侧壁不完整的股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 15;34(9):1085-1090. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202001071.
4
The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.使用髓内髋螺钉治疗反斜型股骨粗隆间骨折。
J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):852-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802b9559.
5
Functional and radiographic outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with calcar reduction, compression, and trochanteric entry nailing.采用股骨距重建、加压和大转子入钉技术治疗股骨转子间骨折的功能和影像学结果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Mar;26(3):148-54. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821e3f8c.
6
[Comparison of clinical effect betweem reconstructing femoral calcar and proximal femoral antirotation nail for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients].老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折重建股骨距与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗的临床效果比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):684-688. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.002.
7
[Comparison of 2-Screw Implant and Antirotational Blade Implant in Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures].2枚螺钉型与防旋刀片型植入物治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(4):268-272.
8
Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.髓内钉与滑动髋螺钉治疗稳定和不稳定转子间和转子下骨折:来自挪威髋部骨折登记处的 17341 名患者。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Feb;104-B(2):274-282. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1078.R1.
9
Radiological parameter associated with the survival of old patients with hip fracture.与老年髋部骨折患者生存相关的放射学参数。
Injury. 2021 Nov;52(11):3388-3396. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.027. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.与拉力螺钉相比,股骨转子间骨折中使用股骨近端髓内钉螺旋刀片更不易发生塌陷。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1421-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02875-8. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Postoperative Hidden Blood Loss in Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation Fixation: The Role of Greater Trochanter Fracture Comminution.评估股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定术后的隐性失血:大转子骨折粉碎的作用
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 7;31:e947226. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947226.
2
Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for factors affecting hip functional recovery after PFNA internal fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.老年股骨转子间骨折PFNA内固定术后影响髋关节功能恢复因素的列线图预测模型的构建与验证
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 27;103(52):e41043. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041043.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Radiological parameter associated with the survival of old patients with hip fracture.与老年髋部骨折患者生存相关的放射学参数。
Injury. 2021 Nov;52(11):3388-3396. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.027. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Integrated dual lag screws versus single lag screw cephalomedullary nail constructs: a meta-analysis and systematic review.综合双拉力螺钉与单拉力螺钉股骨近端髓内钉结构:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Hip Int. 2022 Jul;32(4):550-557. doi: 10.1177/1120700020985067. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis.
Design innovation and rationale of the intramedullary implants for treating Intertrochanteric fractures: A review.
治疗粗隆间骨折的髓内植入物的设计创新与原理:综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Aug 30;56:102525. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102525. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Dual-screw versus single-screw cephalomedullary nails for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双螺杆与单螺杆股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 20;18(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04103-x.
股骨近端防旋髓内钉与 InterTAN 钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 29;15(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02031-8.
4
Risk of reoperation within 12 months following osteosynthesis of a displaced femoral neck fracture is linked mainly to initial fracture displacement while risk of death may be linked to bone quality: a cohort study from Danish Fracture Database.内固定治疗移位股骨颈骨折后 12 个月内再次手术的风险主要与初始骨折移位有关,而死亡风险可能与骨质量有关:来自丹麦骨折数据库的队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):1-75. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1698503. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
A meta-analysis comparing intramedullary with extramedullary fixations for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.一项比较髓内固定与髓外固定治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(37):e17010. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017010.
6
Helical Blade Versus Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Hip Fractures With Cephalomedullary Devices: Incidence of Failure and Atypical "Medial Cutout".螺旋刀片与螺钉固定在股骨近端髓内钉治疗髋部骨折中的应用:失败发生率和非典型的“内侧切迹”。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Aug;32(8):397-402. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001193.
7
Cortical Thickness Index of the Proximal Femur: A Radiographic Parameter for Preliminary Assessment of Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporosis Status in the Age 50 Years and Over Population.股骨近端皮质厚度指数:一种用于50岁及以上人群骨密度和骨质疏松状态初步评估的影像学参数。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun;10(2):149-156. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.149. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018.《骨折与脱位分类汇编 - 2018》
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063.
9
The changing face of fractures of the hip in Northern Ireland: a 15-year review.北爱尔兰髋部骨折情况的变化:一项15年的回顾。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1223-1231. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1284.R1.
10
Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Are Two Proximal Screws Better Than One?股骨转子间骨折的髓内钉固定:两枚近端螺钉是否优于一枚?
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Nov;31(11):577-582. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000967.