• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在欧洲学术记忆诊所中进行标准认知评估的可行性。

Feasibility of a standard cognitive assessment in European academic memory clinics.

机构信息

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Rostock-Greifswald Standort, Rostock, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock Universitätsmedizin, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Jun;19(6):2276-2286. doi: 10.1002/alz.12830. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1002/alz.12830
PMID:36453876
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Standardized cognitive assessment would enhance diagnostic reliability across memory clinics. An expert consensus adapted the Uniform Dataset (UDS)-3 for European centers, the clinician's UDS (cUDS). This study assessed its implementation acceptability and feasibility.

METHODS

We developed a survey investigating barriers, facilitators, and willingness to implement the cUDS. With a mixed-methods design, we analyzed data from academic memory clinics.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight percent of responding clinicians were experienced neuropsychologists/psychologists and 22% were medical specialists coming from 18 European countries. Sixty-five percent clinicians were willing to implement cUDS. General barriers related to implementation (43%) and clinical-methodological domains (21%). Favorable clinicians reported finances (15%) and digitalization (9%) as facilitating, but unavailability of local norms (23%) as hindering. Unfavorable clinicians reported logistical (23%) and time issues (18%).

DISCUSSION

Despite challenges, data showed moderate clinicians' acceptability and requirements to improve feasibility. Nonetheless, these results come from academic clinicians. The next steps will require feasibility evaluation in non-academic contexts.

摘要

简介

标准化认知评估将提高记忆诊所的诊断可靠性。专家共识对统一数据集(UDS)-3 进行了调整,以适应欧洲中心,即临床医生的 UDS(cUDS)。本研究评估了其实施的可接受性和可行性。

方法

我们开发了一项调查,调查了实施 cUDS 的障碍、促进因素和意愿。采用混合方法设计,我们分析了来自 18 个欧洲国家的学术记忆诊所的数据。65%的临床医生愿意实施 cUDS。实施方面的一般障碍(43%)和临床方法学领域(21%)。有利的临床医生报告财务(15%)和数字化(9%)是促进因素,但当地规范的不可用(23%)是阻碍因素。不利的临床医生报告了后勤(23%)和时间问题(18%)。

讨论

尽管存在挑战,但数据显示出了中等程度的临床医生的可接受性和改善可行性的要求。然而,这些结果来自于学术临床医生。下一步将需要在非学术环境中进行可行性评估。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of a standard cognitive assessment in European academic memory clinics.在欧洲学术记忆诊所中进行标准认知评估的可行性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Jun;19(6):2276-2286. doi: 10.1002/alz.12830. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
The need for a consensus in the use of assessment tools for Alzheimer's disease: the Feasibility Study (assessment tools for dementia in Alzheimer Centres across Europe), a European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium's (EADC) survey.阿尔茨海默病评估工具使用达成共识的必要性:可行性研究(欧洲各地阿尔茨海默病中心的痴呆评估工具),欧洲阿尔茨海默病协会(EADC)的一项调查。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;20(8):744-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.1355.
3
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.以目标为导向的认知康复治疗早期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆: GREAT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
4
Assessing the Views of Professionals, Patients, and Care Partners Concerning the Use of Computer Tools in Memory Clinics: International Survey Study.评估专业人员、患者及护理伙伴对记忆门诊中计算机工具使用的看法:国际调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 3;5(12):e31053. doi: 10.2196/31053.
5
Sexual risk reduction interventions for patients attending sexual health clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study.针对就诊于性健康诊所的患者的性风险降低干预措施:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(12):1-122. doi: 10.3310/hta23120.
6
[A survey study towards the opinions of clinicians, patients and care partners regarding computer tools in the memory clinic: sense or nonsense?].[关于记忆门诊中临床医生、患者及护理伙伴对计算机工具看法的一项调查研究:有意义还是无意义?]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jan 25;54(1). doi: 10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.03.
7
eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.癌症患者中用于个性化治疗和护理的患者报告结局测量收集与利用电子健康系统(PROMPT-Care):评估可行性和可接受性的混合方法
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 2;19(10):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8360.
8
Clinicians' Perspectives of Wearable Technology to Detect and Monitor Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed-Method Survey.临床医生对可穿戴技术检测和监测慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的看法:混合方法调查。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Jul 11;18:1401-1412. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S405386. eCollection 2023.
9
GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation.GLA:D® 重返澳大利亚:一项用于实施的混合方法可行性研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 Apr 7;30(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3.
10
Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study.不同皮质类固醇诱导方案在儿童和青少年幼年特发性关节炎中的应用:SIRJIA 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jul;24(36):1-152. doi: 10.3310/hta24360.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding barriers and optimizing socio-cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders.理解神经认知障碍诊断中的障碍并优化社会认知评估。
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Sep;19(3):603-618. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12431. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Computerized cognitive testing to capture cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: Longitudinal findings from the ARMADA study.通过计算机化认知测试捕捉阿尔茨海默病的认知衰退:来自ARMADA研究的纵向研究结果。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Jan 14;17(1):e70046. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70046. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
3
Sex Differences in Elderly People's Sleep: A Cross-Sectional Study.
老年人睡眠的性别差异:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 9;60(10):1654. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101654.
4
The Digitized Memory Clinic.数字化记忆诊所。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Dec;20(12):738-746. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-01033-y. Epub 2024 Oct 25.