• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情对小型农村社区自行车共享系统的影响:以弗吉尼亚州蒙哥马利县自行车共享使用者为例。

The COVID-19 impacts on bikeshare systems in small rural communities: Case study of bikeshare riders in Montgomery County, VA.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278207. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278207
PMID:36454776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714740/
Abstract

The shared and micro-mobility industry (ride sharing and hailing, carpooling, bike and e-scooter shares) saw direct and almost immediate impacts from COVID-19 restrictions, orders and recommendations from local governments and authorities. However, the severity of that impact differed greatly depending on variables such as different government guidelines, operating policies, system resiliency, geography and user profiles. This study investigated the impacts of the pandemic regarding bike-share travel behavior in Montgomery County, VA. We used bike-usage dataset covering two small towns in Montgomery county, namely: Blacksburg and Christiansburg, including Virginia Tech campus. The dataset used covers the period of Jan 2019-Dec 2021 with more than 14,555 trips and 5,154 active users. Findings indicated that a bikeshare user's average trip distance and duration increased in 2020 (compared to 2019) from 2+ miles to 4+ and from half an hour to about an hour. While there was a slight drop in 2021, bikeshare users continued to travel farther distances and spend more time on the bikes than pre-COVID trips. When those averages were unpacked to compare weekday trips to weekend trips, a few interesting trip patterns were observed. Unsurprisingly, more trips still took place on the weekends (increasing from 2x as many trips to 4x as many trips than the weekday). These findings could help to better understand traveler's choices and behavior when encountering future pandemics.

摘要

共享和微移动出行行业(出行共享和叫车、拼车、自行车和电动滑板车共享)受到地方政府和当局的 COVID-19 限制、命令和建议的直接和几乎立即的影响。然而,这种影响的严重程度因政府指导方针、运营政策、系统弹性、地理位置和用户特征等变量而异。本研究调查了大流行对弗吉尼亚州蒙哥马利县自行车共享出行行为的影响。我们使用了涵盖该县两个小镇(布莱克斯堡和克里斯琴斯堡)的自行车使用数据集,包括弗吉尼亚理工大学校园。该数据集涵盖了 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月的期间,有超过 14555 次行程和 5154 名活跃用户。研究结果表明,与 2019 年相比,2020 年(与 2019 年相比)自行车共享用户的平均行程距离和时长从 2 英里以上增加到 4 英里以上,从半小时增加到约 1 小时。虽然 2021 年略有下降,但自行车共享用户的行程距离仍然更远,在自行车上花费的时间也比 COVID 前的行程更长。当将这些平均值分解为比较工作日行程和周末行程时,观察到了一些有趣的行程模式。毫不奇怪,周末的行程仍然更多(从周末的行程是工作日的两倍增加到四倍)。这些发现有助于更好地理解旅行者在遇到未来的大流行时的选择和行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/d158eafbfce0/pone.0278207.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/5c36efd47793/pone.0278207.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/014e1649d9d9/pone.0278207.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/9b3c9ebca13e/pone.0278207.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/852f70afcec3/pone.0278207.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/e0ae51987ea4/pone.0278207.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/d5a4c7dfdce0/pone.0278207.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/4eff89cf2e71/pone.0278207.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/a467ea437b60/pone.0278207.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/8fae9ac42c69/pone.0278207.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/290a2bb24538/pone.0278207.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/c5a4b18f8963/pone.0278207.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/d158eafbfce0/pone.0278207.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/5c36efd47793/pone.0278207.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/014e1649d9d9/pone.0278207.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/9b3c9ebca13e/pone.0278207.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/852f70afcec3/pone.0278207.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/e0ae51987ea4/pone.0278207.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/d5a4c7dfdce0/pone.0278207.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/4eff89cf2e71/pone.0278207.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/a467ea437b60/pone.0278207.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/8fae9ac42c69/pone.0278207.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/290a2bb24538/pone.0278207.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/c5a4b18f8963/pone.0278207.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a026/9714740/d158eafbfce0/pone.0278207.g012.jpg

相似文献

1
The COVID-19 impacts on bikeshare systems in small rural communities: Case study of bikeshare riders in Montgomery County, VA.新冠疫情对小型农村社区自行车共享系统的影响:以弗吉尼亚州蒙哥马利县自行车共享使用者为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278207. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring the potential role of bikeshare to complement public transit: The case of San Francisco amid the coronavirus crisis.探索共享单车对公共交通的补充作用:以新冠疫情危机下的旧金山为例。
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104290. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104290. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
3
COVID-19 effects on shared-biking in New York, Boston, and Chicago.新冠疫情对纽约、波士顿和芝加哥共享单车的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Mar;9:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Public transit use in the United States in the era of COVID-19: Transit riders' travel behavior in the COVID-19 impact and recovery period.新冠疫情时代美国的公共交通使用情况:新冠疫情影响及恢复期的公交乘客出行行为
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Sep;111:53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
When crisis hits: Bike-Sharing platforms amid the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的共享单车:危机来袭
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0283603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283603. eCollection 2023.
6
Understanding individual-level travel behavior changes due to COVID-19: Trip frequency, trip regularity, and trip distance.了解因新冠疫情导致的个人层面出行行为变化:出行频率、出行规律性和出行距离。
Cities. 2023 Apr;135:104223. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104223. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Bike-Sharing Demand Prediction at Community Level under COVID-19 Using Deep Learning.基于深度学习的 COVID-19 下社区层面共享单车需求预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;22(3):1060. doi: 10.3390/s22031060.
8
Who is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward.为谁而骑行?城市共享单车网络对新冠疫情的应对、共享单车使用机会的差异,以及前进的道路。
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):159-164. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
The Impact of COVID-19 on Travel Mode Choice Behavior in Terms of Shared Mobility: A Case Study in Beijing, China.新冠疫情对共享出行模式选择行为的影响:以中国北京为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127130.
10
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bikeshare Usage by Rider Membership Status Across Selected U.S. Cities.新冠疫情对美国部分城市不同骑行会员身份的共享单车使用情况的影响。
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):547-561. doi: 10.1177/03611981221131542. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-dimensional impact of COVID-19 on active mobility in urban China: a scoping review of empirical knowledge.新冠疫情对中国城市活跃出行的多维影响:实证知识的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1398340. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398340. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bike-sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London.新冠疫情对共享单车需求和使用时间的影响:来自伦敦桑坦德自行车共享系统的数据。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260969. eCollection 2021.
2
Transformation of urban mobility during COVID-19 pandemic - Lessons for transportation planning.新冠疫情期间城市交通出行的转变——交通规划的经验教训
J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101257. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101257. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
3
How COVID-19 reshaped quality of life in cities: A synthesis and implications for urban planning.
新冠疫情如何重塑城市生活质量:综述及其对城市规划的启示
Land use policy. 2021 Dec;111:105772. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105772. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
COVID-19 effects on shared-biking in New York, Boston, and Chicago.新冠疫情对纽约、波士顿和芝加哥共享单车的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Mar;9:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282. Epub 2020 Dec 15.