• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情对纽约、波士顿和芝加哥共享单车的影响。

COVID-19 effects on shared-biking in New York, Boston, and Chicago.

作者信息

Padmanabhan Vyas, Penmetsa Praveena, Li Xiaobing, Dhondia Fatema, Dhondia Sakina, Parrish Allen

机构信息

The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States.

Alabama Transportation Institute, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States.

出版信息

Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Mar;9:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282
PMID:33748743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7964246/
Abstract

Coronavirus has had a large-scale impact on transportation. This study attempts to assess the effects of COVID-19 on biking. Bikeshare data was used to understand the impacts of COVID-19 during the initial wave of the disease on biking in New York City, Boston, and Chicago. As the cases increased, these cities experienced a reduction in bikeshare trips, and the reductions were different in the three cities. Correlations were developed between COVID-19 cases and various bikeshare related variables. The study period was split into three phases-no COVID-19 phase, cases increasing phase, and cases decreasing phase-to examine how the residents of the three cities reacted during the different phases of the coronavirus spread. While bike trips decreased, the average duration of the trips increased during the pandemic. NYC's average trip duration was consistently less than that of Boston and Chicago, which could be due to its sprawl (NYC is considered as more compact and connected compared to the other two cities).

摘要

冠状病毒对交通运输产生了大规模影响。本研究试图评估新冠疫情对骑行的影响。共享单车数据被用于了解新冠疫情第一波期间在纽约市、波士顿和芝加哥对骑行的影响。随着病例增加,这些城市的共享单车出行量减少,且三个城市的减少情况有所不同。研究建立了新冠病例与各种共享单车相关变量之间的关联。研究期分为三个阶段——无新冠阶段、病例增加阶段和病例减少阶段——以考察这三个城市的居民在新冠病毒传播的不同阶段的反应。虽然骑行次数减少,但在疫情期间骑行的平均时长增加了。纽约市的平均骑行时长一直低于波士顿和芝加哥,这可能是由于其城市扩张(与其他两个城市相比,纽约市被认为更紧凑且连接性更好)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/e13a979e1075/gr3ac.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/36558eca6d40/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/7df056158b1f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/e13a979e1075/gr3ac.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/36558eca6d40/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/7df056158b1f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48bc/7964246/e13a979e1075/gr3ac.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 effects on shared-biking in New York, Boston, and Chicago.新冠疫情对纽约、波士顿和芝加哥共享单车的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Mar;9:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
The COVID-19 impacts on bikeshare systems in small rural communities: Case study of bikeshare riders in Montgomery County, VA.新冠疫情对小型农村社区自行车共享系统的影响:以弗吉尼亚州蒙哥马利县自行车共享使用者为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278207. eCollection 2022.
3
Bikeshare and subway ridership changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.纽约市在新冠疫情期间共享单车和地铁客流量的变化。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Jun;106:262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
Exploring the potential role of bikeshare to complement public transit: The case of San Francisco amid the coronavirus crisis.探索共享单车对公共交通的补充作用:以新冠疫情危机下的旧金山为例。
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104290. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104290. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
5
Evaluating the impact of environmental interventions across 2 countries: the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS) Study protocol.评估两个国家环境干预措施的影响:国际共享单车对骑行与碰撞影响研究(IBICCS)研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 25;14:1103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1103.
6
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bikeshare Usage by Rider Membership Status Across Selected U.S. Cities.新冠疫情对美国部分城市不同骑行会员身份的共享单车使用情况的影响。
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):547-561. doi: 10.1177/03611981221131542. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Understanding Spatiotemporal Patterns of Biking Behavior by Analyzing Massive Bike Sharing Data in Chicago.通过分析芝加哥大量共享单车数据来理解骑行行为的时空模式。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0137922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137922. eCollection 2015.
8
COVID-19 and Inequity: a Comparative Spatial Analysis of New York City and Chicago Hot Spots.COVID-19 与不平等:对纽约市和芝加哥热点地区的比较空间分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00468-0.
9
Association of city-level walkability, accessibility to biking and public transportation and socio-economic features with COVID-19 infection in Massachusetts, USA: An ecological study.美国马萨诸塞州城市步行便利性、自行车和公共交通可达性以及社会经济特征与 COVID-19 感染的关联:一项生态学研究。
Geospat Health. 2022 Jan 14;17(s1). doi: 10.4081/gh.2022.1017.
10
Who is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward.为谁而骑行?城市共享单车网络对新冠疫情的应对、共享单车使用机会的差异,以及前进的道路。
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):159-164. eCollection 2021 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing alcohol involvement among injured pedalcycle and motorcycle riders across three national public-use datasets.比较三个国家级公共使用数据集中心因伤骑行自行车和骑摩托车者的酒精摄入情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(8):1023-1030. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2364358. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bikeshare Usage by Rider Membership Status Across Selected U.S. Cities.新冠疫情对美国部分城市不同骑行会员身份的共享单车使用情况的影响。
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):547-561. doi: 10.1177/03611981221131542. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Exploring the spatiotemporal factors affecting bicycle-sharing demand during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
探索新冠疫情期间影响共享单车需求的时空因素。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Mar 14:1-36. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10378-0.
4
Impacts of COVID-19 on Bike-Share Usage: The case of Daejeon, Korea.新冠疫情对共享单车使用情况的影响:以韩国大田市为例。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jun 9:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100856.
5
Changes in public bike usage after the COVID-19 outbreak: A survey of Seoul public bike sharing users.新冠疫情爆发后公共自行车使用情况的变化:一项对首尔公共自行车共享用户的调查。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104716. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间一个中型共享单车系统的使用演变模式。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104669. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Uncovering the spatio-temporal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shared e-scooter usage: A spatial panel model.揭示新冠疫情对共享电动滑板车使用情况的时空影响:一个空间面板模型
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jul;20:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100843. Epub 2023 May 17.
8
Investigation on changes in the usage patterns of Seoul Bike usage patterns owing to COVID-19 according to pass type.根据通行证类型对因新冠疫情导致的首尔共享单车使用模式变化的调查。
Heliyon. 2023 May;9(5):e16077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16077. Epub 2023 May 10.
9
Shared E-Scooter Trajectory Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austin, Texas.德克萨斯州奥斯汀市新冠疫情期间共享电动滑板车轨迹分析
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):432-447. doi: 10.1177/03611981221083306. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Who changed and who maintained their urban bike-sharing mobility after the COVID-19 outbreak? A within-subjects study.在新冠疫情爆发后,哪些人改变了,哪些人保持了他们的城市共享单车出行方式?一项受试者内研究。
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104343. Epub 2023 Apr 24.