Suppr超能文献

为谁而骑行?城市共享单车网络对新冠疫情的应对、共享单车使用机会的差异,以及前进的道路。

Who is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Center for Emergency Care and Policy Research, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):159-164. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Black, Latinx, and Indigenous people have contracted the SARS-CoV-2 virus and died of COVID-19 at higher rates than White people. Individuals rated public transit, taxis, and ride-hailing as the modes of transportation putting them at greatest risk of COVID-19 infection. Cycling may thus be an attractive alternative for commuting. Amid the increase in bikeshare usage during the early months of the pandemic, bikeshare companies made changes to membership requirements to increase accessibility, targeting especially essential workers. Essential workers in the United States are disproportionately Black and Latinx, underpaid, and reliant on public transit to commute to work. We document changes made by bikeshare companies, including benefits to various groups of essential workers, and we discuss such changes in the context of longstanding racial disparities in bikeshare access. While well intended, the arbitrary delineation in eligibility for such benefits by class of essential workers unwittingly curtailed access for many who may have benefited most. Given that equity in bikeshare is an important tool to improve access to safe transportation, critical changes in the distribution, accessibility, and usability of bikeshare networks is essential. Bikeshare companies, city planners, and policy makers should collaborate with community-based bike advocates to implement changes, as vocalized by those most in need of alternative forms of transportation.

摘要

黑人、拉丁裔和原住民感染 SARS-CoV-2 病毒并死于 COVID-19 的比例高于白人。人们认为公共交通、出租车和网约车是感染 COVID-19 的最大风险的交通方式。因此,骑自行车可能是通勤的一种有吸引力的替代方式。在大流行早期,共享单车的使用量增加之际,共享单车公司改变了会员要求,以提高可及性,特别是针对必要工人。美国的必要工人不成比例地是黑人和拉丁裔,工资低,依赖公共交通通勤。我们记录了共享单车公司所做的改变,包括为各类必要工人提供的福利,并在共享单车准入方面长期存在种族差异的背景下讨论了这些改变。虽然这些改变的初衷是好的,但按必要工人的类别来划分资格的任意划分无意中限制了许多最有可能受益的人的准入。鉴于共享单车的公平性是改善安全交通获取的重要工具,因此共享单车网络的分配、可及性和可用性必须进行重大改变。共享单车公司、城市规划者和政策制定者应与基于社区的自行车倡导者合作,实施变革,正如最需要替代交通方式的人所表达的那样。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
COVID-19, the Built Environment, and Health.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)、建筑环境与健康
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jul;129(7):75001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8888. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验