Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278480. eCollection 2022.
BACKGROUND: Exercise has been suggested to counteract specific complications of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, its role as a therapeutic option remains poorly understood. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of exercise in IBD. METHODS: Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus) and three registers (Clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and ISRCTN) were searched from inception to September 2022, for studies assessing the effects of structured exercise of at least 4 weeks duration on physiological and/or psychological outcomes in adults with IBD. Two independent reviewers screened records, assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) and ROBINS-I tools, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE method. Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: From 4,123 citations, 15 studies (9 RCTs) were included, comprising of 637 participants (36% male). Pooled evidence from six RCTs indicated that exercise improved disease activity (SMD = -0.44; 95% CI [-0.82 to -0.07]; p = 0.02), but not disease-specific quality of life (QOL) (IBDQ total score; MD = 3.52; -2.00 to 9.04; p = 0.21) when compared to controls. Although meta-analysis could not be performed for other outcomes, benefits were identified in fatigue, muscular function, body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, bone mineral density and psychological well-being. Fourteen exercise-related non-serious adverse events occurred. The overall certainty of evidence was low for disease activity and very low for HRQOL as a result of downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: Structured exercise programmes improve disease activity, but not disease-specific QOL. Defining an optimal exercise prescription and synthesis of evidence in other outcomes, was limited by insufficient well-designed studies to ascertain the true effect of exercise training. This warrants further large-scale randomised trials employing standard exercise prescription to verify this effect to enable the implementation into clinical practice. REGISTRATION: This systematic review was prospectively registered in an international database of systematic reviews in health-related research (CRD42017077992; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
背景:运动被认为可以对抗炎症性肠病 (IBD) 的特定并发症。然而,作为一种治疗选择,其作用仍未被充分理解。因此,我们对运动治疗 IBD 的效果进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
方法:从创建至 2022 年 9 月,我们在五个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、CENTRAL 和 SPORTDiscus)和三个登记处(Clinicaltrials.gov、WHO ICTRP 和 ISRCTN)中搜索了评估至少 4 周结构化运动对 IBD 成人的生理和/或心理结果影响的研究。两名独立的审查员筛选记录,使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 (RoB 2.0) 和 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。使用随机效应模型对数据进行荟萃分析。
结果:从 4123 条引用中,纳入了 15 项研究(9 项 RCT),共纳入 637 名参与者(36%为男性)。六项 RCT 的汇总证据表明,与对照组相比,运动可改善疾病活动度(SMD=-0.44;95%CI[-0.82 至 -0.07];p=0.02),但不能改善疾病特异性生活质量(IBDQ 总分;MD=3.52;-2.00 至 9.04;p=0.21)。尽管无法对其他结局进行荟萃分析,但在疲劳、肌肉功能、身体成分、心肺功能、骨密度和心理健康方面均观察到获益。14 项与运动相关的非严重不良事件发生。由于偏倚和不精确性的降级,疾病活动度的总体证据确定性为低,而疾病特异性 HRQOL 的证据确定性非常低。
结论:结构化运动方案可改善疾病活动度,但不能改善疾病特异性 QOL。由于缺乏足够的精心设计的研究来确定运动训练的真实效果,因此,确定最佳运动处方并综合其他结局的证据受到限制。这需要进一步进行大规模随机试验,采用标准运动处方来验证这种效果,以便将其纳入临床实践。
注册:本系统评价已在国际健康相关研究系统评价数据库(CRD42017077992;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/)中进行了前瞻性注册。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-4-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-1-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-4-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-3-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-6-17
EClinicalMedicine. 2025-4-24
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025-1-31
Front Neurosci. 2024-9-10
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020-7-30
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-10-3
World J Gastroenterol. 2019-7-28