Suppr超能文献

数字跨学科咨询对全科医生二级保健转诊的影响:一项基于阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的方案。

Impact of digital interdisciplinary consultation on secondary care referrals by general practitioners: a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University medical center groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Department General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University medical center groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e060222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060222.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Optimal collaboration between general practice and hospital care is crucial to maintain affordable and sustainable access to healthcare for the entire population. General practitioners (GPs) are the gatekeepers to specialist care and patients will visit hospitals mostly only after referral. However, a substantial part of these referrals may be inappropriate, as communication between GPs and medical specialists can be challenging and referring patients may be the most obvious action for a GP to perform.A new digital platform (Prisma) connects GPs and specialists in interdisciplinary groups and facilitates asynchronous, accessible and fast teleconsultation within the group. No previous research has been done to evaluate the impact of this new platform on the referral rates to the hospital.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be performed in Zwolle region in the Netherlands to analyse the effect of introduction of the platform on rate of inappropriate referrals to orthopaedic surgery. In four steps, GPs in the region will be given access to the platform. GPs will be part of the control condition until randomisation to the intervention. According to our sample size calculation, we need to include 18 practices with 1008 patients presenting with hip and knee symptoms. Routine care data of hospital registrations will be analysed to calculate the rate of inappropriate referrals (primary outcome). Secondary outcome are costs, primary and secondary care workload, posted cases and user satisfaction. Alongside this quantitative analysis, we will evaluate patient experience, facilitators and barriers for use of the platform.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The medical ethics review board of University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), the Netherlands (METc-number: 2021/288) has confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to the process evaluation because the study does not involve randomisation of patients or different medical treatments (letter number: M21.275351).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL9704.

摘要

简介

普通科医生和医院护理之间的最佳协作对于维持整个人口负担得起和可持续的医疗保健服务至关重要。全科医生(GP)是专科护理的守门人,患者只有在转诊后才会去医院就诊。然而,大量转诊可能并不合适,因为全科医生和医学专家之间的沟通可能具有挑战性,转诊可能是全科医生最明显的行动。一个新的数字平台(Prisma)将全科医生和专科医生连接在跨学科小组中,并在小组内实现异步、可访问和快速的远程咨询。以前没有研究评估这个新平台对医院转诊率的影响。

方法和分析

荷兰兹沃勒地区将进行一项阶梯式随机对照试验(RCT),以分析该平台引入对矫形外科不适当转诊率的影响。在四个步骤中,该地区的全科医生将获得该平台的访问权限。在随机分组到干预组之前,全科医生将处于对照条件下。根据我们的样本量计算,我们需要纳入 18 家实践,每家实践有 1008 名患有髋部和膝关节症状的患者。将分析常规护理数据中医院登记的转诊率,以计算不适当转诊率(主要结局)。次要结局包括成本、初级和二级保健工作量、发布病例和用户满意度。除了进行定量分析外,我们还将评估患者体验、使用平台的促进因素和障碍。

伦理和传播

荷兰格罗宁根大学医学中心(UMCG)的医学伦理审查委员会(METc 编号:2021/288)已经确认,人类受试者医学研究法(WMO)不适用于该过程评估,因为该研究不涉及患者随机分组或不同的医疗治疗(信件编号:M21.275351)。

试验注册编号

NL9704。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4567/9716832/34e4d1ebeaea/bmjopen-2021-060222f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验