• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全面康复结局测量量表(CROMS):一种用于康复结局的跨学科测量方法的开发和初步验证。

Comprehensive rehabilitation outcome measurement scale (CROMS): development and preliminary validation of an interdisciplinary measure for rehabilitation outcomes.

机构信息

JSS College of Physiotherapy, Mysuru, 570004, India.

University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 1;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02048-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-022-02048-z
PMID:36456958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714173/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Comprehensive and interdisciplinary measurement of rehabilitation outcome is an essential part of the assessment and prognosis of a patient. Thus, this requires substantial contributions from the patient, their family and the rehabilitation professional working with them. Moreover, the measurement tool should be comprehensive and must consider the cultural compatibility, cost efficiency and contextual factors of the region.

METHODS

The Comprehensive Rehabilitation Outcome Measurement Scale (CROMS) was developed through consensus and followed the Delphi process incorporating inputs from various rehabilitation professionals. The domains and items were finalized using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The tool was validated in two native languages and back-translated considering the semantic equivalence of the scale. Intra-class correlation coefficient was performed to determine the agreement between the therapist and patient-reported scales.

RESULTS

The final CROMS carries 32 comprehensive items that can be completed by the person with disability and the professional team. CROMS compares well to similar items on FIM (l ICC of 0.93) and has good internal consistency with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.92 for both patient and therapist reported measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 32 item CROMS is a tool that can potentially be used to evaluate the functional independence of various patient populations, predominantly patients with neurological disabilities.

摘要

简介

全面的跨学科康复结果测量是患者评估和预后的重要组成部分。因此,这需要患者、他们的家人以及与之合作的康复专业人员的大量贡献。此外,测量工具应该全面,并且必须考虑到该地区的文化兼容性、成本效益和背景因素。

方法

全面康复结果测量量表(CROMS)是通过共识制定的,并遵循德尔菲法,纳入了来自不同康复专业人员的意见。使用主成分分析(PCA)确定了各个领域和项目。该工具使用两种母语进行了验证,并考虑了量表的语义等效性进行了回译。采用组内相关系数来确定治疗师和患者报告量表之间的一致性。

结果

最终的 CROMS 有 32 个综合项目,可由残疾人和专业团队完成。CROMS 与 FIM 上的类似项目相比(l ICC 为 0.93),具有良好的内部一致性,患者和治疗师报告的测量值的 Cronbach's Alpha 分别为 0.92。

结论

32 项 CROMS 是一种工具,可用于评估各种患者群体的功能独立性,主要是神经残疾患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/9714173/86199c496872/12955_2022_2048_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/9714173/0c21bd1412fe/12955_2022_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/9714173/86199c496872/12955_2022_2048_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/9714173/0c21bd1412fe/12955_2022_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/9714173/86199c496872/12955_2022_2048_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive rehabilitation outcome measurement scale (CROMS): development and preliminary validation of an interdisciplinary measure for rehabilitation outcomes.全面康复结局测量量表(CROMS):一种用于康复结局的跨学科测量方法的开发和初步验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 1;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02048-z.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive assessment of oral health and occlusion in individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta.用于评估成骨不全症患者口腔健康和咬合的标准综合评估指标集。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Aug 13;19(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03308-5.
4
Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke.针对中风患者的波斯语版功能独立性测量量表的跨文化验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(3):289-98. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1036173. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Pancreatic Carcinoma: An International Delphi Survey.基于价值的胰腺癌患者为中心的结局标准集:一项国际德尔菲调查。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):1069-1078. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08679-0. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
Associations between Patient-Reported and Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients after Traumatic Injuries of the Lower Limb.下肢创伤患者的患者报告结局和临床医生报告结局测量之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;19(5):3140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053140.
7
Mapping the Functional Independence Measure to a multi-attribute utility instrument for economic evaluations in rehabilitation: a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data.将功能独立性测量映射到用于康复经济评估的多属性效用工具:随机对照试验数据的二次分析
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Oct;42(21):3024-3032. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1582720. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
8
Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the stroke-specific quality of life (SSQOL) scale 2.0 into Amharic language.将中风专用生活质量量表(SSQOL)2.0 翻译成阿姆哈拉语,并进行跨文化翻译、改编和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jan 23;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02092-3.
9
Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients.开发用于评估老年康复患者身体功能的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)简短形式。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2563-2572. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02506-5. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set.针对患有复杂神经功能障碍的工作年龄成年人的专科住院康复的成本效益:一项基于国家临床数据集的多中心队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 24;6(2):e010238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010238.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-based rehabilitation medicine: definition, foundation, practice and development.循证康复医学:定义、基础、实践与发展
Med Rev (2021). 2023 Sep 25;4(1):42-54. doi: 10.1515/mr-2023-0027. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Efficacy in Older Patients After Traumatic Brain Injury: Assessed by the Functional Independence Measure.创伤性脑损伤后老年患者的长期多学科康复疗效:通过功能独立性测量进行评估
Acta Med Okayama. 2021 Aug;75(4):479-486. doi: 10.18926/AMO/62400.
2
Barriers and facilitators to interdisciplinary communication during consultations: a qualitative study.障碍和促进因素在咨询过程中的跨学科沟通:定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e046111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046111.
3
Interdisciplinary Care Networks in Rehabilitation Care for Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review.
慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者康复护理中的跨学科护理网络:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2021 May 10;10(9):2041. doi: 10.3390/jcm10092041.
4
The Impact of Interdisciplinary Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation on Improving Neurological Outcomes.跨学科脊髓损伤康复对改善神经学结果的影响。
Global Spine J. 2021 Jun;11(5):817-818. doi: 10.1177/2192568220984145.
5
'Food for thought': The importance of nutrition to patient care and the role of the junior doctor.“值得思考的问题”:营养对患者护理的重要性以及初级医生的作用。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 May;21(3):e272-e274. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0707.
6
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.健康科学中的德尔菲技术:一幅图谱。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.
7
Overload of Medical Documentation: A Disincentive for Healthcare Professionals.医疗文件过载:医疗专业人员的抑制因素。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1324:1-10. doi: 10.1007/5584_2020_587.
8
A Cultural Perspective on Functional Limitations and Well-Being.关于功能限制与幸福的文化视角
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Sep;46(9):1378-1391. doi: 10.1177/0146167220905712. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. 6th Edition Update 2019.《加拿大卒中最佳实践建议:卒中后的康复、恢复及社区参与》。2019年第6版更新
Int J Stroke. 2020 Oct;15(7):763-788. doi: 10.1177/1747493019897843. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10
Maintaining skin integrity in the aged: A systematic review.维护老年人的皮肤完整性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Mar;103:103509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103509. Epub 2019 Dec 23.