Liu Huimeng, Wang Yutong, Zhang Binyan, Huo Yating, Cao Suixia, Liu Jingchun, Zeng Lingxia, Yan Hong, Dang Shaonong, Mi Baibing
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Int J Hypertens. 2022 Nov 22;2022:6055940. doi: 10.1155/2022/6055940. eCollection 2022.
Dietary modulation is a primary lifestyle approach for reducing the risk of hypertension. However, evidence of the potential role that a dietary taste preference plays in the risk of hypertension remains limited.
A cross-sectional analysis was conducted based on the Shaanxi baseline survey of the Regional Ethnic Cohort Study. We used self-reported salt consumption and intensity preferences for sourness and spiciness to calculate the taste preference score, which was categorized into bland, moderate, and strong. A generalized linear mixed model and quantile regression were performed to estimate associations between taste preferences and hypertension/blood pressure.
Among 27,233 adults, 72.2% preferred a moderate taste and 21.4% preferred a strong taste. Compared with a bland taste, a stronger taste preference might be associated with a higher risk of hypertension (adjusted OR for a moderate taste = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.49; adjusted OR for a strong taste = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.71; = 0.002), especially in females (adjusted OR for a moderate taste = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.66; adjusted OR for a strong taste = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.83; < 0.001). Quantile regression showed that the taste preference was positively associated with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ( - ) in females, with an average increase of 3.31 mmHg for a strong taste ( = 3.31, < 0.001) and 1.77 mmHg for a moderate taste ( = 1.77, = 0.008).
A preference for stronger multitastes of salty, sour, and spicy might be associated with a higher risk of hypertension, especially in females. This relationship possibly occurs through increasing DBP. Dietary modulation with the promotion of a bland taste is encouraged.
饮食调节是降低高血压风险的主要生活方式。然而,饮食口味偏好在高血压风险中潜在作用的证据仍然有限。
基于区域民族队列研究的陕西基线调查进行横断面分析。我们使用自我报告的盐摄入量以及对酸味和辣味的喜好程度来计算口味偏好得分,该得分分为清淡、适中、浓烈三类。采用广义线性混合模型和分位数回归来估计口味偏好与高血压/血压之间的关联。
在27233名成年人中,72.2%的人偏好适中口味,21.4%的人偏好浓烈口味。与清淡口味相比,更强的口味偏好可能与更高的高血压风险相关(适中口味的调整后比值比=1.25,95%置信区间:1.06,1.49;浓烈口味的调整后比值比=1.41,95%置信区间:1.15,1.71;P=0.002),尤其是在女性中(适中口味的调整后比值比=1.43,95%置信区间:1.24,1.66;浓烈口味的调整后比值比=1.55,95%置信区间:1.32,1.83;P<0.001)。分位数回归显示,口味偏好在女性中与舒张压(DBP)呈正相关(β),浓烈口味时平均升高3.31 mmHg(β=3.31,P<0.001),适中口味时升高1.77 mmHg(β=1.77,P=0.008)。
对更浓烈的咸、酸、辣复合口味的偏好可能与更高的高血压风险相关,尤其是在女性中。这种关系可能通过升高舒张压而发生。鼓励通过促进清淡口味进行饮食调节。