没错，但是……我们需要可靠性来推进婴幼儿研究工作，但还有更多需要考虑的因素：可靠性的重要细微差别以及纳入有效性的必要性。
Yes, but … We need reliability to advance infant work, but there's more to consider too: Important nuances of reliability and the need to include validity.
作者信息
Kucker Sarah C, Chmielewski Michael
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA.
出版信息
Infant Child Dev. 2022 Sep-Oct;31(5). doi: 10.1002/icd.2325. Epub 2022 May 3.
Abstract
The field of development needs more reliable infant work - improving our measures and methods is at the heart of accurately understanding why children do what they do! However, as scientists, we cannot stop with reliability but must also include measures of validity in our studies. In this commentary, we clarify and expand upon discussions of reliability and measurement error. We also argue for the importance of assessing the validity of our measures and tasks. Indeed, careful considerations of both reliability and validity are necessary for improving infant research.
摘要
发展领域需要更可靠的婴幼儿研究——改进我们的测量方法和手段是准确理解儿童行为原因的核心！然而，作为科学家，我们不能仅停留在可靠性上，还必须在研究中纳入效度测量。在这篇评论中，我们澄清并扩展了关于可靠性和测量误差的讨论。我们还强调了评估我们的测量方法和任务效度的重要性。事实上，仔细考虑可靠性和效度对于改进婴幼儿研究都是必要的。
相似文献
1
Yes, but … We need reliability to advance infant work, but there's more to consider too: Important nuances of reliability and the need to include validity.没错，但是……我们需要可靠性来推进婴幼儿研究工作，但还有更多需要考虑的因素：可靠性的重要细微差别以及纳入有效性的必要性。
Infant Child Dev. 2022 Sep-Oct;31(5). doi: 10.1002/icd.2325. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
We need to talk about validity - A commentary on "Six solutions for more reliable infant research" from the viewpoint of an early executive functions researcher.我们需要谈谈效度——从早期执行功能研究者的视角对《让婴儿研究更可靠的六种解决方案》的评论。
Infant Child Dev. 2022 Sep-Oct;31(5):e2352. doi: 10.1002/icd.2352. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?提高健康领域离散选择实验的质量：我们如何评估有效性和可靠性？
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
4
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
5
Is the Health Behavior in School-Aged Survey Questionnaire Reliable and Valid in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Young Populations? A Systematic Review.《学龄期儿童健康行为调查问卷调查表评估青少年身体活动和久坐行为的可靠性和有效性如何？系统评价》
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;10:729641. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.729641. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychometric viability of measures of functional performance commonly used for people with dementia: a systematic review of measurement properties.常用于痴呆症患者的功能表现测量方法的心理测量可行性：测量属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):115-71. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003064.
7
A novel tablet-based application for assessment of manual dexterity and its components: a reliability and validity study in healthy subjects.一种用于评估手部灵巧性及其组成部分的新型平板应用程序：在健康受试者中的信度和效度研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Mar 24;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01011-9.
8
The validity and reliability of ultra-short-term heart rate variability parameters and the influence of physiological covariates.超短期心率变异性参数的有效性和可靠性及生理协变量的影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Jun 1;130(6):1848-1867. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00955.2020. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research.信度和效度：医学研究中的重要性。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2401-2406. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.06-861.
10
Assessing reliability and validity measures in managed care studies.评估管理式医疗研究中的可靠性和有效性测量方法。
Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Summer;16(3):153-62; quiz 163-5.
本文引用的文献
1
The timescales of word learning in children with language delays: In-the-moment mapping, retention, and generalization.儿童语言迟缓的词汇学习时间尺度：即时映射、保持和泛化。
J Child Lang. 2023 Mar;50(2):245-273. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000817. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants.24个月大婴儿的快速映射但记忆不佳。
Infancy. 2008 Mar 4;13(2):128-157. doi: 10.1080/15250000701795598. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
3
The role of developmental change and linguistic experience in the mutual exclusivity effect.发展变化和语言经验在互斥效应中的作用。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104191. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度：客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Examining the construct validity of affective judgments of physical activity measures.检验身体活动量度情感判断的结构效度。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Sep;28(9):1128-41. doi: 10.1037/pas0000322.
6
Slowing Down Fast Mapping: Redefining the Dynamics of Word Learning.减缓快速映射：重新定义词汇学习的动态过程。
Child Dev Perspect. 2015 Jun;9(2):74-78. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12110. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.词汇学习源于在线目标选择和缓慢联想学习的相互作用。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):831-77. doi: 10.1037/a0029872.
8
Fast mapping, slow learning: disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30months.快速映射，缓慢学习：18、24 和 30 个月时与词汇学习相关的新单词-对象映射的歧义消除。
Cognition. 2013 Jan;126(1):39-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity.内部一致性、重测信度及其对人格量表效度的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;15(1):28-50. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366253. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
10
What is being assessed and why it matters: the impact of transient error on trait research.正在评估的内容及其重要性：瞬时误差对特质研究的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):186-202. doi: 10.1037/a0015618.
Zotero 插件