Ambrosio Luca, Vadalà Gianluca, Russo Fabrizio, Pascarella Giuseppe, De Salvatore Sergio, Papalia Giuseppe F, Ruggiero Alessandro, Di Folco Marta, Carassiti Massimiliano, Papalia Rocco, Denaro Vincenzo
Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Global Spine J. 2023 May;13(4):1163-1179. doi: 10.1177/21925682221142264. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
Systematic review.
To investigate the efficacy of nonsurgical interventional treatments for chronic low back pain (LBP) caused by facet joint syndrome (FJS).
A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify studies that compared interventional treatments for LBP due to FJS among them, with usual care or sham procedures. Studies were evaluated for pain, physical function, disability, quality of life and employment status. The RoB-2 and MINORS tools were utilized to assess the risk of bias in included studies.
Eighteen studies published between January 2000 and December 2021 were included (1496 patients, mean age: 54.31 years old). Intraarticular (IA) facet joint (FJ) injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) did not show significant difference compared to IA corticosteroids (CCS) in terms of pain and satisfaction. FJ denervation using radiofrequency (RF) displayed slightly superior or similar outcomes compared to IA CCS, physical therapy, or sham procedure. IA CCS showed better outcomes when combined with oral diclofenac compared to IA CCS or oral diclofenac alone but was not superior to IA local anesthetic and Sarapin. IA platelet-rich plasma (PRP) led to an improvement of pain, disability and satisfaction in the long term compared to IA CCS.
FJS is a common cause of LBP that can be managed with several different strategies, including nonsurgical minimally invasive approaches such as IA HA, CCS, PRP and FJ denervation. However, available evidence showed mixed results, with overall little short-term or no benefits on pain, disability, and other investigated outcomes.
系统评价。
探讨非手术介入治疗对小关节综合征(FJS)所致慢性下腰痛(LBP)的疗效。
对文献进行系统评价,以确定比较FJS所致LBP的介入治疗与常规治疗或假手术的研究。对研究的疼痛、身体功能、残疾、生活质量和就业状况进行评估。采用RoB-2和MINORS工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
纳入2000年1月至2021年12月发表的18项研究(1496例患者,平均年龄:54.31岁)。在疼痛和满意度方面,关节内(IA)小关节(FJ)注射透明质酸(HA)与IA皮质类固醇(CCS)相比无显著差异。与IA CCS、物理治疗或假手术相比,使用射频(RF)进行FJ去神经支配显示出略优或相似的结果。与单独使用IA CCS或口服双氯芬酸相比,IA CCS联合口服双氯芬酸显示出更好的效果,但并不优于IA局部麻醉药和Sarapin。与IA CCS相比,IA富血小板血浆(PRP)可长期改善疼痛、残疾和满意度。
FJS是LBP的常见原因,可采用多种不同策略进行管理,包括IA HA、CCS、PRP和FJ去神经支配等非手术微创方法。然而,现有证据显示结果不一,总体上对疼痛、残疾和其他研究结局几乎没有短期益处或无益处。