Hopper G P, Wilson W T, O'Donnell L, Hamilton C, Blyth M J G, MacKay G M
NHS Lanarkshire University Hospitals, 218 Eaglesham Road, East Kilbride, Glasgow, Scotland, G75 8RG, UK.
Rosshall Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Dec 2;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00549-w.
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of secondary surgery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation in comparison to conventional hamstring ACL reconstruction. We hypothesised that there would be no differences between the groups.
This was a retrospective comparison study of patients undergoing ACL surgery between September 2011 and April 2018. Two hundred and 73 patients underwent ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. During the same timeframe, 137 patients with an acute proximal ACL rupture underwent ACL repair with suture tape augmentation. One patient was lost to follow-up in the ACL reconstruction group leaving 272 patients (99.6%) for the final analysis. In the ACL repair group, three patients were lost to follow-up leaving 134 patents (97.8%) for the final analysis. Secondary surgery was identified by contacting the patients by email/telephone and reviewing patient notes at the time of this analysis.
Re-rupture occurred in 32 patients (11.8%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to 22 patients (16.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.194). Contralateral ACL rupture occurred in four patients (1.5%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to three patients (2.2%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.224). In the ACL reconstruction group, nine patients (3.3%) required secondary meniscal surgery whilst five patients (3.7%) required meniscal surgery in the ACL repair group (p = 0.830). Seven other operations were performed in the ACL reconstruction group (2.6%) compared to three other operations in the ACL repair group (2.2%) (p = 0.374). The overall number of patients undergoing secondary surgery in the ACL reconstruction group was 52 (19.1%) in comparison to 30 (22.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.114).
ACL repair with suture tape augmentation for acute proximal ruptures demonstrated comparable rates of secondary surgery with hamstring ACL reconstruction.
本研究旨在确定与传统腘绳肌前交叉韧带(ACL)重建相比,使用缝线带增强技术进行ACL修复术后二次手术的频率。我们假设两组之间无差异。
这是一项对2011年9月至2018年4月期间接受ACL手术患者的回顾性对比研究。273例患者采用自体腘绳肌进行ACL重建。在同一时间段内,137例急性近端ACL断裂患者接受了缝线带增强技术的ACL修复。ACL重建组有1例患者失访,最终分析纳入272例患者(99.6%)。ACL修复组有3例患者失访,最终分析纳入134例患者(97.8%)。通过在本次分析时通过电子邮件/电话联系患者并查阅患者病历确定二次手术情况。
ACL重建组有32例患者(11.8%)发生再断裂,而ACL修复组有22例患者(16.4%)发生再断裂(p = 0.194)。ACL重建组有4例患者(1.5%)发生对侧ACL断裂,而ACL修复组有3例患者(2.2%)发生对侧ACL断裂(p = 0.224)。ACL重建组有9例患者(3.3%)需要进行二次半月板手术,而ACL修复组有5例患者(3.7%)需要进行半月板手术(p = 0.830)。ACL重建组还进行了7例其他手术(2.6%),而ACL修复组进行了3例其他手术(2.2%)(p = 0.374)。ACL重建组接受二次手术的患者总数为52例(19.1%),而ACL修复组为30例(22.4%)(p = 0.114)。
对于急性近端断裂,使用缝线带增强技术进行ACL修复显示出与腘绳肌ACL重建相当的二次手术发生率。