• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设身处地:换位思考是否能抵御替代伴侣的吸引力?

Put Me in Your Shoes: Does Perspective-Taking Inoculate Against the Appeal of Alternative Partners?

机构信息

Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University (IDC, Herzliya).

Department of Psychology, University of Rochester.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):936-945. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2150998. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1080/00224499.2022.2150998
PMID:36459596
Abstract

People commit to monogamous relationships with the intent of maintaining sexual exclusivity but often fail to do so. Existing research has focused on individual and relationship characteristics that render relationships more vulnerable to infidelity, paying less attention to strategies that decrease the likelihood of straying. Three experiments investigated the impact of one strategy that might encourage people to enact relationship-protective responses toward alternative partners, perspective-taking. In all studies, participants either adopted the perspective of their partner or not and then evaluated, encountered, or thought about attractive strangers, in Studies 1-3, respectively. Participants' pro-relationship orientation and reactions during these experiences (interest in alternative and current partners, commitment to current relationships, and fantasmatic themes) were recorded. Results showed that perspective-taking decreased sexual and romantic interest in alternatives, while increasing commitment and desire for current partners. These findings suggest that partner perspective-taking discourages engagement in behaviors that may hurt partners and damage the relationship with them.

摘要

人们致力于一夫一妻制关系,意图保持性行为的排他性,但往往未能做到。现有研究主要关注使关系更容易出轨的个人和关系特征,而较少关注减少出轨可能性的策略。三项实验研究了一种可能鼓励人们对替代伴侣采取关系保护反应的策略,即换位思考。在所有研究中,参与者要么采用伴侣的视角,要么不采用,然后分别在研究 1-3 中评估、遇到或思考有吸引力的陌生人。记录了参与者在这些体验中的亲关系取向和反应(对替代和当前伴侣的兴趣、对当前关系的承诺以及幻想主题)。结果表明,换位思考会降低对替代者的性和浪漫兴趣,同时增加对当前伴侣的承诺和渴望。这些发现表明,伴侣换位思考会阻止可能伤害伴侣并破坏与他们关系的行为的发生。

相似文献

1
Put Me in Your Shoes: Does Perspective-Taking Inoculate Against the Appeal of Alternative Partners?设身处地:换位思考是否能抵御替代伴侣的吸引力?
J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):936-945. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2150998. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
2
Is Infidelity Contagious? Online Exposure to Norms of Adultery and Its Effect on Expressions of Desire for Current and Alternative Partners.出轨是否具有传染性?网络环境中对通奸规范的接触及其对当前和替代伴侣欲望表达的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):3919-3930. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02392-7. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Our Fragile Relationships: Relationship Threat and Its Effect on the Allure of Alternative Mates.我们易碎的关系:关系威胁及其对替代伴侣吸引力的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Apr;48(3):703-713. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1321-5. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Stepping into their shoes: Reducing the actor-observer discrepancy in judgments of infidelity through the experimental manipulation of perspective-taking.设身处地:通过实验操控换位思考来减少判断不忠实时的演员-观察者差异。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):692-708. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1556575. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity.远离伴侣,却又接近浪漫的替代品:回避依恋、对替代品的兴趣和不忠。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1302-16. doi: 10.1037/a0025497. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
6
Monogamy, the Protective Fallacy: Sexual versus Emotional Exclusivity and the Implication for Sexual Health Risk.一夫一妻制,保护性谬论:性排他与情感排他及其对性健康风险的影响
J Sex Res. 2016;53(1):64-73. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.1003771. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
The Power to Flirt: Power within Romantic Relationships and Its Contribution to Expressions of Extradyadic Desire.调情的力量:浪漫关系中的权力及其对关系外欲望表达的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jan;54(1):139-156. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02997-0. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
8
A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners.一夫一妻制和双方自愿非一夫一妻制性伴侣的性健康史及行为比较。
J Sex Med. 2015 Oct;12(10):2022-8. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12987. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
9
Passion, Relational Mobility, and Proof of Commitment: A Comparative Socio-Ecological Analysis of an Adaptive Emotion in a Sexual Market.激情、关系流动性与承诺证明:性市场中一种适应性情绪的比较社会生态分析
Evol Psychol. 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):1474704917746056. doi: 10.1177/1474704917746056.
10
Walk the Line: How Successful Are Efforts to Maintain Monogamy in Intimate Relationships?《保持一致:维持亲密关系中一夫一妻制的努力有多成功?》
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Aug;48(6):1735-1748. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1376-3. Epub 2019 Jun 18.