Akça Merve, Bishop Laura, Vuoskoski Jonna Katariina, Laeng Bruno
RITMO Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time and Motion, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Musicology, University of Oslo, Norway.
RITMO Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time and Motion, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Musicology, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Brain Cogn. 2023 Feb;165:105928. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105928. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Attentional selection of a second target in a rapid stream of stimuli embedding two targets tends to be briefly impaired when two targets are presented in close temporal proximity, an effect known as an attentional blink (AB). Two target sounds (T1 and T2) were embedded in a rapid serial auditory presentation of environmental sounds with a short (Lag 3) or long lag (Lag 9). Participants were to first identify T1 (bell or sine tone) and then to detect T2 (present or absent). Individual stimuli had durations of either 30 or 90 ms, and were presented in streams of 20 sounds. The T2 varied in category: human voice, cello, or dog sound. Previous research has introduced pupillometry as a useful marker of the intensity of cognitive processing and attentional allocation in the visual AB paradigm. Results suggest that the interplay of stimulus factors is critical for target detection accuracy and provides support for the hypothesis that the human voice is the least likely to show an auditory AB (in the 90 ms condition). For the other stimuli, accuracy for T2 was significantly worse at Lag 3 than at Lag 9 in the 90 ms condition, suggesting the presence of an auditory AB. When AB occurred (at Lag 3), we observed smaller pupil dilations, time-locked to the onset of T2, compared to Lag 9, reflecting lower attentional processing when 'blinking' during target detection. Taken together, these findings support the conclusion that human voices escape the AB and that the pupillary changes are consistent with the so-called T2 attentional deficit. In addition, we found some indication that salient stimuli like human voices could require a less intense allocation of attention, or noradrenergic potentiation, compared to other auditory stimuli.
在嵌入两个目标的快速刺激流中,当两个目标在时间上非常接近时,对第二个目标的注意力选择往往会短暂受损,这种效应被称为注意力瞬脱(AB)。两个目标声音(T1和T2)被嵌入到一系列快速呈现的环境声音中,间隔时间较短(滞后3)或较长(滞后9)。参与者首先要识别T1(铃声或正弦波音调),然后检测T2(是否存在)。单个刺激的持续时间为30毫秒或90毫秒,并以20个声音的流形式呈现。T2在类别上有所不同:人声、大提琴声或狗叫声。先前的研究已将瞳孔测量法作为视觉AB范式中认知加工强度和注意力分配的有用指标。结果表明,刺激因素的相互作用对目标检测准确性至关重要,并支持了人声最不可能出现听觉AB(在90毫秒条件下)这一假设。对于其他刺激,在90毫秒条件下,滞后3时T2的准确性明显低于滞后9时,表明存在听觉AB。当出现AB(在滞后3时)时,与滞后9相比,我们观察到与T2开始时间锁定的瞳孔扩张较小,这反映了在目标检测“眨眼”期间注意力加工较低。综上所述,这些发现支持了人声可避免AB且瞳孔变化与所谓的T2注意力缺陷一致这一结论。此外,我们发现一些迹象表明,与其他听觉刺激相比,像人声这样的显著刺激可能需要较少的注意力分配或去甲肾上腺素能增强。