Institute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173, Hannover, Germany.
Dpt. Food Science and Technology, University of Cordoba, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence ceiA3, Campus Rabanales s/n. Crta. Madrid-Cádiz km 396A, 14014, Córdoba, Spain.
Food Microbiol. 2023 Apr;110:104152. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104152. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
The importance of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. as a food-borne pathogen continues to increase and there is a great need for rapid quantitative results in routine diagnostics. However, currently, only the culture-based ISO method is authorized for use in the context of official food control. The present study therefore aimed to assess the suitability of a qPCR method for a rapid quantitative determination of Campylobacter spp. at different stages in the poultry production chain and its equivalence with the culture-based method. Samples from two processors were collected and evaluated both separately and together. Censored regression (Tobit) models have been used to establish a relationship between Campylobacter qPCR counts on the carcasses and explanatory variables of processor and meat counts. Further, correlations of qPCR Campylobacter spp. counts at the different stages of production were calculated. In addition, the comparative data between microbiological enumeration and qPCR results were statistically analyzed. In the correlation calculation of the qPCR results, a highly significant relationship between the Campylobacter spp. counts of the neck skin samples to breast fillet and leg samples could be calculated, indicating a good prediction of Campylobacter spp. loads in these samples. The intercalating dye ethidium monoazide (EMA) was used to see whether the correlations between microbiological counts and qPCR results were improved by pretreating fecal and cecal samples before qPCR analysis. It was shown that the observed values of scatter plots between the qPCR-based and the culture-based methods were strongly correlated. However, on average, the qPCR results were two log CFU/mL levels higher than the microbiological counts. However, the classical culture-based method for food hygiene risk assessment cannot be replaced one-to-one by the qPCR or EMA-qPCR. The qPCR method can rather be used for the rapid identification of particularly highly contaminated flocks.
耐热弯曲菌属作为食源性致病菌的重要性不断增加,因此在常规诊断中急需快速定量结果。然而,目前仅有基于培养的 ISO 方法被授权用于官方食品控制。因此,本研究旨在评估 qPCR 方法在禽肉生产链的不同阶段快速定量检测弯曲菌属的适用性,并评估其与基于培养的方法的等效性。从两家加工厂采集样本并分别和合并进行评估。使用删失回归(Tobit)模型建立了在胴体上 qPCR 计数与加工厂和肉计数的解释变量之间的关系。此外,还计算了生产过程中不同阶段 qPCR 弯曲菌属计数之间的相关性。此外,还对微生物计数和 qPCR 结果之间的比较数据进行了统计分析。在 qPCR 结果的相关性计算中,可以计算出颈部皮肤样本与鸡胸肉和鸡腿样本之间弯曲菌属计数之间的高度显著关系,表明可以很好地预测这些样本中的弯曲菌属负荷。使用嵌入染料吖啶橙(EMA)来观察在进行 qPCR 分析之前对粪便和盲肠样本进行预处理是否可以改善微生物计数和 qPCR 结果之间的相关性。结果表明,基于 qPCR 和基于培养的方法之间散点图的观察值具有很强的相关性。然而,平均而言,qPCR 结果比微生物计数高两个对数 CFU/mL 水平。然而,经典的基于培养的食品卫生风险评估方法不能被 qPCR 或 EMA-qPCR 一一取代。qPCR 方法可用于快速鉴定特别严重污染的禽群。