Suppr超能文献

同性恋的未来?算了吧!痴呆、同性恋理论和规范性的限制。

Queer futures? Forget it! Dementia, queer theory and the limits of normativity.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK.

出版信息

J Aging Stud. 2022 Dec;63:100993. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100993. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Abstract

This article, which takes inspiration from Sandberg and Marshall's (2017) critique of successful ageing futures, considers how dementia is framed, arguing that it needs to be queered beyond a simple challenge of the biomedical model. The article draws on ideas from Queer Theory to demonstrate how dementia is framed within normative tropes around loss, decline and forgetting. Using Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA) the article undertakes a detailed reading of an advertisement produced by Alzheimer's Society, UK, an important cultural intermediary in framing how dementia is understood culturally. The analysis highlights three key features of categorisation work used in the advertisement: framing the multigenerational family; being isolated and alone with dementia; and recapturing hope/de-queering dementia. The articles show how cultural texts intended to educate the public about dementia, draw on and propagate normative tropes about the condition that frames it in heteronormative, reproductive, futurological terms. The ramifications of this are discussed in the analytic discussion and conclusions section.

摘要

这篇文章借鉴了 Sandberg 和 Marshall(2017)对成功老龄化未来的批判,考虑了痴呆症是如何被构建的,认为有必要超越对生物医学模式的简单挑战,将其同性恋化。本文借鉴了酷儿理论的观点,展示了痴呆症是如何在与丧失、衰退和遗忘有关的规范比喻中被构建的。本文使用成员分类分析(MCA)对英国阿尔茨海默病协会制作的一则广告进行了详细的阅读,该协会是在文化上理解痴呆症的重要文化中介,在广告中突出了分类工作的三个关键特征:构建多代家庭;孤立和孤独地患有痴呆症;重新获得希望/去同性恋化痴呆症。文章表明,旨在向公众宣传痴呆症的文化文本借鉴并传播了关于该疾病的规范比喻,这些比喻将其框定为异性恋、生殖、未来主义的术语。在分析讨论和结论部分讨论了这一现象的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验