Chidiac Claude, Walshe Catherine, Lowers Jane, Preston Nancy
International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 13;25(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06006-4.
LGBT + people are disproportionately at an increased risk for developing dementia. Dementia can compound the impact of stigma and social marginalisation experienced by LGBT + people, and is likely to create barriers to accessing healthcare services. Understanding the needs, preferences, and experiences of LGBT + people with dementia will help support high quality individualised care. The aim of this review is to explore and synthesise the evidence on the needs, preferences, and experiences of LGBT + people with dementia.
Systematic review with thematic synthesis. The search strategy combined concepts of gender and sexual minorities, and dementia. MEDLINE Complete, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Academic Search Ultimate were searched until March 2024. Relevant published papers in the English language were included, regardless of design or type. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings were discussed from a queer lens.
Out of 1537 initial titles, 16 papers were included. Majority were published in the UK (n = 8), followed by USA (n = 4), Canada (n = 2), and Australia (n = 2). Of 16 papers, two were empirical qualitative studies, one used a subset of qualitative data from a previous study alongside other sources (literature review, reflection, policy) for data analysis, and 13 papers were non-empirical. The experiences primarily focused on actual or anticipated discrimination, and how the lifetime experiences of oppression, trauma, and other stressors can impact on the experience of dementia. Many of the needs captured focused on safety and control in identity disclosure and expression, and access to love, intimacy, and social networks. In addition, maintaining personhood through institutional safety, psychological safety, and attachment through relationships and couplehood were highlighted. Data on preferences were not explicit.
The robustness of the science is weak regarding the needs, preferences, and experiences of LGBT + people with dementia. Designing and implementing dementia-related policies through a queer intersectional lens, along with embedded cultural safety education programmes, are needed. Further research that includes the voice of LGBT + people with dementia coupled with healthcare professionals' perspective is needed.
LGBT+人群患痴呆症的风险不成比例地增加。痴呆症会加剧LGBT+人群所经历的耻辱感和社会边缘化的影响,并可能给获得医疗服务造成障碍。了解患有痴呆症的LGBT+人群的需求、偏好和经历将有助于支持高质量的个性化护理。本综述的目的是探索和综合关于患有痴呆症的LGBT+人群的需求、偏好和经历的证据。
采用主题综合法进行系统综述。检索策略结合了性别和性少数群体以及痴呆症的概念。检索了MEDLINE Complete、PsycInfo、CINAHL和Academic Search Ultimate数据库,直至2024年3月。纳入了英文发表的相关论文,无论其设计或类型如何。使用主题分析法对数据进行分析。从酷儿视角讨论研究结果。
在1537个初始标题中,纳入了16篇论文。大多数论文发表在英国(n = 8),其次是美国(n = 4)、加拿大(n = 2)和澳大利亚(n = 2)。在这16篇论文中,两篇是实证定性研究,一篇使用了先前研究的定性数据子集以及其他来源(文献综述、反思、政策)进行数据分析,13篇论文是非实证性的。这些经历主要集中在实际或预期的歧视,以及一生的压迫、创伤和其他压力源经历如何影响痴呆症体验。所捕捉到的许多需求集中在身份披露和表达方面的安全与控制,以及获得爱、亲密关系和社交网络。此外,强调了通过机构安全、心理安全以及通过人际关系和伴侣关系保持人格。关于偏好的数据并不明确。
关于患有痴呆症的LGBT+人群的需求、偏好和经历,现有科学依据的稳健性较弱。需要通过酷儿交叉视角设计和实施与痴呆症相关的政策,以及嵌入式文化安全教育项目。需要开展进一步研究,纳入患有痴呆症的LGBT+人群的声音以及医疗保健专业人员的观点。