Khurana Kanishk V, Ranjan Aditya
Medicine and Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 30;14(10):e30868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30868. eCollection 2022 Oct.
The most widespread presenting ailments among patients visiting the emergency department are chest pain and shortness of breath. These symptoms lead any doctor to a probable diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Detailed patient history, testing of blood samples for cardiac biomarkers that are indicative of cardiovascular necrosis, ultrasound methods, electrocardiography, and coronary computed tomography (CT) could all be beneficial to support the diagnosis. Out of these, electrocardiography is the most important and commonly done investigation in the emergency departments for patients presenting with chest pain and shortness of breath. However, interpreting these patients' electrocardiograms (ECGs) may be a matter of concern and worry. T wave and ST-segment changes are often of interest in the early signs of myocardial ischemia. Despite its incredible sensitivity, ST-segment deviation (elevated or depressed) has a low specificity because it can be seen in a variety of other cardiac and non-cardiac diseases. When ST-segment anomalies are identified, clinicians must consider many additional characteristics (such as risk factors, symptoms, and anamnesis), as well as all other possible diagnoses. All of these scenarios of patients presenting in the emergency department with chest discomfort and shortness of breath showing ST-segment abnormalities can leave a healthcare professional wondering whether to start treatment for acute myocardial infarction, through either the administration of a fibrinolytic agent, exposing patients to both the benefits and risks of fibrinolysis, or invasive coronary angiography. An astute physician may be able to recognize fabricated differential diagnosis mimicking ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in some situations. Failure to recognize these imposters can result in inefficient resource utilization, which can expose patients to unjustified risk and increased rather than decreased death and morbidity. Since the danger of cerebral hemorrhage from blood thinners is significant, in patient-care scenarios, in order to rule out percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a thorough assessment of the ECG is essential to consider diseases other than acute myocardial infarction, especially the ones that are non-cardiac in origin. The goal of this narrative review is to give an overview of the significant disorders that are non-cardiac in origin that can mimic an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
前往急诊科就诊的患者中最常见的病症是胸痛和呼吸急促。这些症状会使任何医生怀疑可能是心肌梗死(MI)。详细的患者病史、检测血液样本中指示心血管坏死的心脏生物标志物、超声检查、心电图以及冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CT)都有助于支持诊断。其中,心电图是急诊科对出现胸痛和呼吸急促症状的患者进行的最重要且最常用的检查。然而,解读这些患者的心电图可能会令人担忧。T波和ST段改变通常是心肌缺血早期迹象中令人关注的方面。尽管ST段偏移(抬高或压低)具有惊人的敏感性,但其特异性较低,因为它可见于多种其他心脏和非心脏疾病。当发现ST段异常时,临床医生必须考虑许多其他特征(如危险因素、症状和既往史)以及所有其他可能的诊断。所有这些在急诊科出现胸痛和呼吸急促且伴有ST段异常的患者情况,都会让医护人员思考是否要通过使用纤溶药物开始急性心肌梗死的治疗,使患者面临纤溶治疗的益处和风险,或者进行侵入性冠状动脉造影。在某些情况下,敏锐的医生可能能够识别出伪装成ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的伪造鉴别诊断。未能识别这些冒名顶替者可能导致资源利用效率低下,使患者面临不合理的风险,增加而非降低死亡率和发病率。由于血液稀释剂导致脑出血的风险很大,在患者护理场景中,为了排除经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),对心电图进行全面评估对于考虑急性心肌梗死以外的疾病,尤其是非心脏源性疾病至关重要。本叙述性综述的目的是概述可能模仿ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的非心脏源性重大疾病。