• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人技术与老年人的真实性价值:颠覆性技术还是重振固有原则?

Robot Technology for the Elderly and the Value of Veracity: Disruptive Technology or Reinvigorating Entrenched Principles?

机构信息

Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI & GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Bioethics Institute Ghent and METAMEDICA, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;28(6):64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00420-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-022-00420-2
PMID:36469167
Abstract

The implementation of care robotics in care settings is identified by some authors as a disruptive innovation, in the sense that it will upend the praxis of care. It is an open ethical question whether this alleged disruption will also have a transformative impact on established ethical concepts and principles. One prevalent worry is that the implementation of care robots will turn deception into a routine component of elderly care, at least to the extent that these robots will function as simulacra for something that they are not (i.e. human caregivers). At face value, this may indeed seem to indicate a concern for how this technology may upend existing practices and relationships within a care setting. Yet, on closer inspection, this reaction may rather point to a rediscovery and a revaluation of a particularly well-entrenched value or virtue, i.e. veracity. The virtue of veracity is one of the values that is mobilized to argue against a substitution of human caregivers (while a combination of care robots and human caregivers is much more accepted). The subject of this paper is to explore how the moral panic surrounding care robots should not so much be interpreted as an anticipated and probable disruptor in a care setting, but rather as a sensitizing - in a way conservationist - argument that identifies veracity as an established value that is supposed to be protected and advanced in present day and future care settings.

摘要

一些作者认为,护理机器人在护理环境中的应用是一种颠覆性创新,因为它将颠覆护理实践。一个悬而未决的伦理问题是,这种所谓的颠覆是否也会对既定的伦理概念和原则产生变革性影响。一个普遍的担忧是,护理机器人的实施将把欺骗变成老年护理的常规组成部分,至少在这些机器人作为它们不是的东西(即人类护理者)的模拟物的程度上。从表面上看,这似乎确实表明了人们对这项技术可能颠覆护理环境中现有实践和关系的担忧。然而,仔细观察,这种反应可能更多地指向对一种特别根深蒂固的价值观或美德的重新发现和重新评价,即真实性。真实性的美德是为反对替代人类护理者而调动的价值观之一(而护理机器人和人类护理者的结合则更容易被接受)。本文的主题是探讨围绕护理机器人的道德恐慌不应被解读为护理环境中预期和可能的颠覆者,而应被视为一种敏感化——以一种保守主义的方式——的论点,即把真实性视为一种既定的价值,应该在当今和未来的护理环境中得到保护和推进。

相似文献

1
Robot Technology for the Elderly and the Value of Veracity: Disruptive Technology or Reinvigorating Entrenched Principles?机器人技术与老年人的真实性价值:颠覆性技术还是重振固有原则?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;28(6):64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00420-2.
2
Dental Robotics: A Disruptive Technology.口腔机器人:一种颠覆性技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 11;21(10):3308. doi: 10.3390/s21103308.
3
Acceptability of Social Robots and Adaptation of Hybrid-Face Robot for Dementia Care in India: A Qualitative Study.社交机器人的可接受性和混合脸机器人在印度的痴呆症护理中的适应性:定性研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop.关于在专业护理中使用社交机器人的观点:场景方法研讨会的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 10;23(11):e20046. doi: 10.2196/20046.
5
Significant challenges when introducing care robots in Swedish elder care.在瑞典老年护理中引入护理机器人面临重大挑战。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Feb;17(2):166-176. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1773549. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
6
Ethica ex machina: issues in roboethics.机器中的伦理:机器人伦理问题
J Int Bioethique. 2013 Dec;24(4):17-26, 176-7. doi: 10.3917/jib.243.0015.
7
[Emotional robots in a nursing context : Empirical analysis of the present use and the effects of Paro and Pleo].[护理环境中的情感机器人:对帕罗和普莱奥当前使用情况及其效果的实证分析]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jan;51(1):16-24. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1346-8. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Social Values of Care Robots.关怀机器人的社会价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 11;19(24):16657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416657.
9
Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.识别特征,提高老年人对机器人的接受度:混合方法研究。
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
The Use of Robotics in Dementia Care: An Ethical Perspective.机器人在痴呆症护理中的应用:伦理视角。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:362-366. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210934.