• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关怀机器人的社会价值。

Social Values of Care Robots.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan-si 15588, Republic of Korea.

Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Wonju-si 25457, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 11;19(24):16657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416657.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192416657
PMID:36554541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9779215/
Abstract

Care robots have the potential to address the challenge of aging societies, such as labor shortages or the aging workforce. While previous studies have focused mainly on the productivity or workability of care robots, there has been an increasing need to understand the social value of care robots. This study attempted to identify the social values of care robots by conducting focus group interviews (FGIs) with twenty-four care recipients and caregivers and by using analytic hierarchy processes (AHPs) with thirteen individuals with expertise in the care service and care robot industries. Our results show that the labor- and health-related benefits, the technology innovation, and the provision of essential care work have the highest importance among the criteria of care robots' social values. The criteria that receive lowest priority are cost, the autonomy and needs of the care recipients, and the organizational innovation. Our study suggests that along with the private benefits and costs of care robots, their social values also need to be considered to improve the quality of care and to unlock the potential of the care robot industries.

摘要

护理机器人有可能解决老龄化社会面临的挑战,例如劳动力短缺或劳动力老龄化。虽然之前的研究主要集中在护理机器人的生产力或可操作性上,但越来越需要了解护理机器人的社会价值。本研究通过对 24 名护理接受者和护理者进行焦点小组访谈(FGI),并对 13 名具有护理服务和护理机器人行业专业知识的人使用层次分析法(AHP),试图确定护理机器人的社会价值。我们的研究结果表明,在护理机器人的社会价值标准中,与劳动力和健康相关的益处、技术创新和提供基本护理工作具有最高的重要性。优先级最低的标准是成本、护理接受者的自主性和需求以及组织创新。本研究表明,除了护理机器人的私人利益和成本之外,还需要考虑其社会价值,以提高护理质量并释放护理机器人行业的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/9779215/08ef640da652/ijerph-19-16657-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/9779215/08ef640da652/ijerph-19-16657-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/9779215/08ef640da652/ijerph-19-16657-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Values of Care Robots.关怀机器人的社会价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 11;19(24):16657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416657.
2
Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop.关于在专业护理中使用社交机器人的观点:场景方法研讨会的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 10;23(11):e20046. doi: 10.2196/20046.
3
Acceptability of Social Robots and Adaptation of Hybrid-Face Robot for Dementia Care in India: A Qualitative Study.社交机器人的可接受性和混合脸机器人在印度的痴呆症护理中的适应性:定性研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
User Experience in Social Robots.社交机器人的用户体验。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 26;21(15):5052. doi: 10.3390/s21155052.
5
Providing Aging Adults Social Robots' Companionship in Home-Based Elder Care.为居家养老的老年人提供社交机器人陪伴。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Jun 4;2019:2726837. doi: 10.1155/2019/2726837. eCollection 2019.
6
Effect of Industrial Robots on Employment in China: An Industry Level Analysis.工业机器人对中国就业的影响:行业层面分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;2022:2267237. doi: 10.1155/2022/2267237. eCollection 2022.
7
Service innovation through social robot engagement to improve dementia care quality.通过社交机器人参与实现服务创新以提高痴呆症护理质量。
Assist Technol. 2017 Spring;29(1):8-18. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1171807. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
8
Significant challenges when introducing care robots in Swedish elder care.在瑞典老年护理中引入护理机器人面临重大挑战。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Feb;17(2):166-176. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1773549. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
9
Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍社交辅助人形机器人在医疗和社会保健领域应用的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e033096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033096.
10
A qualitative exploration of care homes workers' views and training needs in relation to the use of socially assistive humanoid robots in their workplace.对养老院工作人员关于在其工作场所使用社交辅助类人机器人的看法和培训需求的定性探索。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 May;17(3):e12432. doi: 10.1111/opn.12432. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A Networked Intelligent Elderly Care Model Based on Nursing Robots to Achieve Healthy Aging.一种基于护理机器人实现健康老龄化的网络化智能养老模式。
Research (Wash D C). 2025 Jan 22;8:0592. doi: 10.34133/research.0592. eCollection 2025.
2
The effectiveness of care robots in alleviating physical burden and pain for caregivers: Non-randomized prospective interventional study - Preliminary study.护理机器人在减轻护理人员身体负担和疼痛方面的有效性:非随机前瞻性干预研究——初步研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40877. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040877.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of a Humanoid Companion Robot on Dementia Symptoms and Caregiver Distress for Residents in Long-Term Care.人形陪伴机器人对长期护理居民的痴呆症状和照护者压力的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Nov;21(11):1724-1728.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
Effectiveness of robotics fall prevention program among elderly in senior housings, Bangkok, Thailand: a quasi-experimental study.泰国曼谷老年公寓中老年人机器人防跌倒项目的效果:一项准实验研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Feb 18;14:335-346. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S182336. eCollection 2019.
3
Nurses' needs for care robots in integrated nursing care services.
综合护理服务中护士对护理机器人的需求。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 May 13. doi: 10.1111/jan.13711.
4
Caregivers' experiences with the selection and use of assistive technology.护理人员在选择和使用辅助技术方面的经历。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Aug;13(6):562-567. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1353652. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
5
A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders.对一款老年服务机器人的多视角评估:不同利益相关者的声音。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Aug;13(6):592-599. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1358300. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
6
I wonder if robots will take care of me when I am old: Positive aging representations of professionals working in health promotion services.我想知道当我年老时机器人是否会照顾我:健康促进服务领域专业人员对积极老龄化的呈现。
J Health Psychol. 2016 Dec;21(12):2872-2881. doi: 10.1177/1359105315587141. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
7
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.老年人对辅助机器人的接受度:在生活实验室环境中进行为期 1 个月的人机交互混合方法研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435. eCollection 2014.
8
Identifying the Potential for Robotics to Assist Older Adults in Different Living Environments.识别机器人技术在不同生活环境中协助老年人的潜力。
Int J Soc Robot. 2014 Apr 1;6(2):213-227. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0218-7.
9
Evaluation of an intelligent wheelchair system for older adults with cognitive impairments.评估一款针对认知障碍老年人的智能轮椅系统。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 7;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-90.
10
Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation--a systematic review.机器人辅助治疗对踝关节康复的疗效——系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Mar 21;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-30.