• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗机构对 HPV 初筛检测有效性的看法及推荐——3 个医疗体系的比较。

Provider beliefs in effectiveness and recommendations for primary HPV testing in 3 health-care systems.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Jan 3;7(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac086.

DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkac086
PMID:36469348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9825247/
Abstract

In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force endorsed primary human papillomavirus testing (pHPV) for cervical cancer screening. We aimed to describe providers' beliefs about pHPV testing effectiveness and which screening approach they regularly recommend. We invited providers who performed 10 or more cervical cancer screens in 2019 in 3 healthcare systems that had not adopted pHPV testing: Kaiser Permanente Washington, Mass General Brigham, and Parkland Health; 53.7% (501/933) completed the survey between October and December 2020. Response distributions varied across modalities (P < .001), with cytology alone or cotesting being more often viewed as somewhat or very effective for 30- to 65-year-olds compared with pHPV (cytology alone 94.1%, cotesting 96.1%, pHPV 66.0%). In 21- to 29-year-olds, the pattern was similar (cytology alone 92.2%, 64.7% cotesting, 50.8% pHPV). Most providers were either incorrect or unsure of the guideline-recommended screening interval for pHPV. Educational efforts are needed about the relative effectiveness and recommended use of pHPV to promote guideline-concordant care.

摘要

2018 年,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)认可了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测作为宫颈癌筛查的主要方法。我们旨在描述医疗服务提供者对 HPV 检测有效性的看法,以及他们通常推荐的哪种筛查方法。我们邀请了在三个医疗系统中进行了 10 次或更多宫颈癌筛查的医疗服务提供者参加这项研究,这三个系统尚未采用 HPV 检测:Kaiser Permanente Washington、Mass General Brigham 和 Parkland Health。在 2020 年 10 月至 12 月期间,有 53.7%(501/933)的参与者完成了调查。应答者的分布因检测方法而异(P<0.001),细胞学或联合检测被认为在 30 至 65 岁人群中对宫颈癌的筛查效果比 HPV 检测更为有效(细胞学单独检测 94.1%,联合检测 96.1%,HPV 检测 66.0%)。在 21 至 29 岁的人群中,情况类似(细胞学单独检测 92.2%,联合检测 64.7%,HPV 检测 50.8%)。大多数医疗服务提供者对 HPV 检测的推荐筛查间隔要么是不正确的,要么是不确定的。需要进行有关 HPV 检测的相对有效性和推荐使用的教育工作,以促进符合指南的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7442/9825247/ffe721cc5f2b/pkac086f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7442/9825247/d697255e1475/pkac086f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7442/9825247/ffe721cc5f2b/pkac086f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7442/9825247/d697255e1475/pkac086f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7442/9825247/ffe721cc5f2b/pkac086f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Provider beliefs in effectiveness and recommendations for primary HPV testing in 3 health-care systems.医疗机构对 HPV 初筛检测有效性的看法及推荐——3 个医疗体系的比较。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Jan 3;7(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac086.
2
Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.普通风险人群的宫颈癌筛查:美国癌症协会 2020 年指南更新。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Sep;70(5):321-346. doi: 10.3322/caac.21628. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Relative Performance of HPV and Cytology Components of Cotesting in Cervical Screening.HPV 和细胞学检测在宫颈癌筛查中的相对性能。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):501-508. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx225.
4
Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.以 CIN3+ 风险为基准,将 HPV 和巴氏涂片联合检测纳入宫颈癌筛查和管理指南。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Apr;17(5 Suppl 1):S28-35. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318285423c.
5
Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.初级保健中的宫颈癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):706-714. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19872.
6
Screening for Cervical Cancer With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.人乳头瘤病毒高危型检测用于宫颈癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):687-705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10400.
7
Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies.宫颈癌筛查:传统巴氏涂片检查、液基细胞学检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测作为单独或联合检测策略的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Mar;30(3):474-484. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1003. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.液基细胞学与人类乳头状瘤病毒检测:来自中国 13 项基于人群的宫颈癌筛查研究数据的汇总分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 May;133(2):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.液基细胞学检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测筛查宫颈癌:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):687-97, W214-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00376. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
10
Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗女性的最佳宫颈癌筛查
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 18;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw216. Print 2017 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Locally-tailored vs. centrally-administered strategies for implementation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an integrated healthcare system: a qualitative research study.在综合医疗保健系统中实施原发性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查的因地制宜策略与集中管理策略:一项定性研究
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 15;5:1595934. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1595934. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinician-perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at three US healthcare systems.美国三个医疗系统中临床医生所感知到的在2019年冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间宫颈癌筛查存在的障碍。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jun 1;43:102783. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102783. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Cancer Screening: Updated Guidelines from the American Cancer Society.宫颈癌筛查:美国癌症协会的最新指南
Am Fam Physician. 2021 Sep 1;104(3):314-315.
2
Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013-2019.美国大型医疗索赔数据库中 2013-2019 年宫颈癌筛查检测使用趋势。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;163(2):378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Modeling Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies With Varying Levels of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.
Implementation science for cancer control: One center's experience addressing context, adaptation, equity, and sustainment.
癌症控制实施科学:一个中心针对背景、调整、公平和持续开展工作的经验。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Mar 21;14(4):215-224. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad078.
建模 HPV 疫苗接种率不同的宫颈癌筛查策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2115321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15321.
4
Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems.四个医疗体系中初级保健提供者对结直肠癌筛查的信念和建议。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Nov;13(11):947-958. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin.威斯康星州接受调查的初级保健提供者的乳腺癌筛查建议差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2553-2559. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05922-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors.2019年美国阴道镜和子宫颈病理学会基于风险的子宫颈癌筛查异常检测及癌前病变管理共识指南。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525.
7
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort.PROSPR I 联盟中的宫颈癌筛查研究:美国队列的基本原理、方法和基线结果。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;144(6):1460-1473. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31940. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.医患沟通对癌症筛查依从性的影响:一项系统评价。
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Provider beliefs associated with cervical cancer screening interval recommendations: A pilot study in Federally Qualified Health Centers.与宫颈癌筛查间隔建议相关的医疗服务提供者信念:联邦合格健康中心的一项试点研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:444-447. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.05.008.
10
Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines.乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查指南变更后的医疗服务提供者态度及筛查实践
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):52-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3449-5.